Skip to main content

Governing Is in the Details—The Longitudinal Impact of IT-related Policy Management for Public Boards

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Technology Governance in Public Organizations

Part of the book series: Integrated Series in Information Systems ((ISIS,volume 38))

  • 1275 Accesses

Abstract

Decision makers increasingly enforce policies of digitalization of everyday activities. The aim of this study is to examine, at the micro level, the practices and their impact of people transforming the way they conduct their public board work due to an IT-related policy decision. We argue for analysis of the seemingly small, slow, yet fundamental interactions with which humans shape and reinvent organizational life. Our approach provides insights into the impact of implementation of policy decisions and how change of seemingly mundane activities creates the evolution of new structures and practices of importance. Our study highlights a reconstitution of routines and change of anchoring practices of a public board that (a) anchors new material to a board member’s responsibilities without utilizing its inherent advantages, (b) anchors new conflicting routines while abandoning well established ones, and (c) results in new routines that weaken fundamental goals of the board member’s role and work counterproductive to human cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, H. G. (1854). The works of the right honourable Edmund Burke (Vol. I, pp. 446–448). London. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_democracy#cite_note-3. Accessed 20 April 2015.

  • Bond, G., Drake, R., McHugo, G., Rapp, C., & Whitley, R. (2009). Strategies for improving fidelity in the national evidence-based practices project. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1999). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson Lundström, J., & Edenius, M. (2014). Anchoring tablets in organizational practices—a practice based approach to the digitalization of board work. In The Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Auckland, New Zealand, December 14–17, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edenius, M., & Eriksson Lundström, J. (2016). Technology-triggered change management as means for unintended reconstitution of board work (submitted manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Macmillan, UK: Basingstoke.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structure. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action (Vol. 1). Boston: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. (1958). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the foundation of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P. (2013). Theoretical foundation for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23, 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P., & Barley, S. R. (2008). Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, 18(3), 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, C., Mair F. S., Finch, T., MacFarlane, A., Dowrick, C., Treweek, S., Rapley, T., Ballini, L., Ong, B. N., Rogers, A., Murray, E., Elwyn, G., Legare, F., Gunn, J., & Montor V. M. (2009). Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization process theory. Implementation Science 4(29).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(3), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D. (2007). Stretching out and expanding medical practices: the case of telemedicine. Human Relations, 60(6), 889–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13, 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T. (2008). Technology and institutions: Living in a material world. Theory of Sociology, 37, 461–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, Hal G. (2003). Understanding and managing public organizations (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Wiley/Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruigrok, W., Peck, S., & Board, H. (2006). Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making: Evidence from Swiss companies. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 1201–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, U., & Boland, R. J. (2000). Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation. American Journal of Sociology (98), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaast, E., & Walsham, G. (2005). Representation and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use. Information and Organization, 15, 65–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenny Eriksson Lundström .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lundström, J.E., Edenius, M. (2017). Governing Is in the Details—The Longitudinal Impact of IT-related Policy Management for Public Boards. In: Rusu, L., Viscusi, G. (eds) Information Technology Governance in Public Organizations. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58978-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics