Skip to main content

Analyzing the Impact of Strategic Performance Management Systems and Role Ambiguity on Performance: A Qualitative Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Developments and Advances in Intelligent Systems and Applications

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 718))

  • 903 Accesses

Abstract

This research questions the assumption that strategic performance measurement systems (SPMS) that define strategic goals at the individual job level reduce role ambiguity and ensure desired employee outcomes. Through qualitative research of both white-collar and blue-collar jobs, we seek to determine the types of jobs most amenable to SPMS guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Asare, E., Conger, S.: Strategic performance measurement systems and employee performance. In: Rocha, A., Reis Paulo, L., Cota Perez, M., Suarez, S.O., Goncalves, R. (eds.) 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 88–92. AISTI, Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bisbe, J., Malagueño, R.: Using strategic performance measurement systems for strategy formulation: does it work in dynamic environments? Manag. Account. Res. 23(4), 296–311 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.mar.2012.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burney, L., Henle, C., Widener, S.: A path model examining the relations among strategic performance measurement system characteristics, organizational justice, and extra- and in-role performance. Acc. Organ. Soc. 34(3–4), 305–321 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burney, L., Widener, S.K.: Strategic performance measurement systems, job-relevant information, and managerial behavioral responses—role stress and performance. Behav. Res. Account. 19, 43–69. http://search.proquest.com/docview/203298201?accountid=7106 (2007)

  5. Burney, L., Widener, S.K.: Behavioral work outcomes of a strategic performance measurement system-based incentive plan. Behav. Res. Account. 25, 115–143. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1449191526?accountid=7106 (2013)

  6. Choi, J., Hecht, G.W., Tayler, W.B.: Lost in translation: the effects of incentive compensation on strategy surrogation. Account. Rev. 87, 1135–1163. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1464803 (2012)

  7. Creswell, W.J.: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks, California (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eatough, E.M., Chu-Hsiang, C., Miloslavic, S.A., Johnson, R.E.: Relationships of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 96(3), 619–632 (2011). doi:10.1037/a0021887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall, M.: The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance. Acc. Organ. Soc. 33(2–3), 141–163 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Balance Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balance Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leach-Lopez, M.A., Stammerjohan, W.W., McNair, F.M.: Differences in the role of job-relevant information in the budget participation-performance relationship among U.S and Mexican managers: A question of culture or communication. J. Manag. Account. Res. 19, 105–136 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., Lampel, J.: Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management. Free Press, NY, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Onyemah, V.: Role Ambiguity, Role Conflict, and Performance: Empirical Evidence of an Inverted-U Relationship. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 28(3), 299–314 (2008). doi:10.2753/PSS0885-3134280306

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M., Parasuraman, A.: Crowd-funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. J. Serv. Manag. 22, 443–470 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parisi, C.: The impact of organisational alignment on the effectiveness of firms’ sustainability strategic performance measurement systems: an empirical analysis. J. Manag. Gov. 17(1), 71–97 (2013). doi:10.1007/s10997-012-9219-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rapiah, M., Hui, W.S., Ibrahim, R., Aziz, A.: The relationship between strategic performance measurement systems and organisational competitive advantage. Asian-Pac. Manag. Account. J. 5(1), 1–20. http://9icsts2014.um.edu.my/filebank/published_article/6431/AJBA_5.pdf (2014)

  18. Saldaňa, J.: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks, California (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument, 15th edn. Cambridge University Press, London (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Yin, R.K.: Case study research: design and methods. In: Bickman, L., Rog, D.J. (eds.) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, vol. 5. Sage Publications. doi:10.1097/FCH.0b013e31822dda9e (2009)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sue Conger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

The Interview Protocol

  1. 1.

    Tell me about how you spend your day at work. What are the major elements of your job?

  2. 2.

    Are there any parts of your job you are not clear about how to perform or not clear about what is expected of you? [review job as described above]

  3. 3.

    What information do you need from outside your job to do your work? Where does it come from? Do you always have it? Do you ever think you need more or other information to do your job? What type? Where might is come from? Why don’t you have it?

  4. 4.

    In your opinion, what makes you a successful employee of this organization? Are there some elements of your job performance that might be improved? What and how?

  5. 5.

    Do you pay attention to the firm’s SPMS and its feedback? How do you use it? What impact does it have on your job?

  6. 6.

    In a few words, can you describe the vision, mission, and strategy of your organization?

  7. 7.

    How does your organization’s business model work relative to your job?

  8. 8.

    From the vision, mission and strategy you describe, describe your role in their implementation?

  9. 9.

    In your opinion, how does your role help your organization achieve its strategy?

  10. 10.

    A strategic performance management system, also known as SPMS, is used in your organization. Does it apply to your job? And how? What are benefits of SPMS to you? To your job?

  11. 11.

    To what extent and how does the SPMS help you do your job? To what extent and how does the SPMS help you understand your job duties?

  12. 12.

    What kind of information does your SPMS provide you? How is this information relevant to your job?

  13. 13.

    What do you do when you have questions about your job?

  14. 14.

    On what criteria are your performance evaluations based?

  15. 15.

    From your experience, how does the SPMS affect your performance evaluation?

  16. 16.

    Do you think your performance evaluation might be different if you had a better understanding of your job duties? Could the SPMS provide that understanding?

  17. 17.

    Does your performance evaluation process refer to the SPMS or your SPMS performance?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Asare, E., Conger, S. (2018). Analyzing the Impact of Strategic Performance Management Systems and Role Ambiguity on Performance: A Qualitative Approach. In: Rocha, Á., Reis, L. (eds) Developments and Advances in Intelligent Systems and Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 718. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58965-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58965-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58963-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58965-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics