Abstract
This chapter presents a history of land use, ownership, and development in downtown Phoenix since World War II, training specific attention on public and private strategies of development, often in conflict, that have produced Phoenix’s particular urban environment. This chapter continues on to present novel data regarding the prevalence of vacant land and the localization of property ownership. Land and development policies born from both neoliberal and sustainable development approaches, all intended to rectify serious issues of vacancy and abandonment, have impacted the character of downtown and led to both tensions and compromises between different stakeholders. While many attempts at revitalization have relied on an auto-dependent vision of urbanism promoting large institutional projects, this approach has been increasingly challenged by local arts community members emphasizing a local, bohemian, self-generating economy based on cultural production. Site-specific attempts to encourage development by public-private entities utilizing municipal tax incentives are often targeted at both of these development visions, producing conflict and exerting unintended consequences on the private market. The historical success of development is quantitatively measured by studying the extent of local underdeveloped land over 30 years, showing notable but spatially uneven decreases in urban vacancy overall. Non-local property ownership is assessed and mapped over 20 years to show that local ownership of developable property has significantly declined, and when paired with interview data indicating the importance of local commitment for bohemian sustainability outcomes, the study indicates that non-local ownership has decreased the transparency of local land use and development processes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Accordino, J., and G.T. Johnson. 2000. Addressing the vacant and abandoned property problem. Journal of Urban Affairs 22 (3): 301–315.
Arizona State University (ASU) and Matthias Moeller. 2000. Land cover classification using Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM) data. Tempe, AZ: Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research project, Arizona State University. http://caplter.asu.edu/data/data-catalog/?id=372. Accessed September 4, 2013.
Arizona Tax Research Association (ATRA). 2009. Failure of GPLET reform creates uncertainty. ATRA Newsletter, vol. 69, no. 5. http://www.arizonatax.org/sites/default/files/publications/newsletters/file/ATRA_Newsletter_2009_08.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2012.
———. 2010. ATRA’s GPLET reforms finally become law. ATRA Newsletter, vol. 70, no. 3. http://www.arizonatax.org/sites/default/files/publications/newsletters/file/ATRA_Newsletter_2010_05.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2012.
Arthesia. 2008. Metro Phoenix DNA: A strategy book. Phoenix: Metro Phoenix Partnership for Arts and Culture (MPAC).
Atkinson-Palombo, Carol, and Michael J. Kuby. 2011. The geography of advance transit-oriented development in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, 2000–2007. Journal of Transport Geography 19 (2): 189–199.
Bowman, A.O’.M., and M.A. Pagano. 2004. Terra incognita: Vacant land and urban strategies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
City of Phoenix. 1969a. Central Phoenix Plan. Phoenix: City of Phoenix Planning Department.
———. 1969b. Comprehensive Plan 1990. Phoenix: City of Phoenix Planning Department.
———. 1970. Report and recommendations on the Central Phoenix Plan. Phoenix: City of Phoenix Planning Commission.
———. 1971. Central Phoenix Plan (Resolution No. 13739, Phoenix City Council, September 28). Phoenix: City of Phoenix Planning Commission.
———. 1979a. Downtown area redevelopment and improvement plan. Phoenix City Council, March 13.
———. 1979b. Phoenix Concept Plan 2000. Phoenix: City of Phoenix Planning Department.
———. 1983a. Phoenix urban villages: Citizen planning in action. Phoenix: City of Phoenix Planning Department.
———. 1983b. High rise in Phoenix: Overview/issues. Phoenix: City of Phoenix Planning Department.
———. 1985. Central City village: A plan for our future. City of Phoenix.
———. 1991. Downtown Specific Plan: A 25-year vision. Phoenix: City of Phoenix Planning Department, Central Phoenix Committee.
———. 1995. Urban infill strategies, phase 1: Opportunities, barriers, process. Phoenix: City of Phoenix Planning Department.
———. 2002. General Plan Update. Phoenix: City of Phoenix Planning Department.
———. 2005. Government Property Lease Excise Tax agreement between City of Phoenix and Alta Phoenix LP, Contract No 115934-UDL-001. http://www.azdor.gov/PropertyTax/GPLET.aspx?CountyID=7&CityID=203. Accessed October 16, 2012.
———. 2008. Downtown Phoenix Plan. City of Phoenix City Council. July 2. http://phoenix.gov/urbanformproject/dtplan.html. Accessed July 6, 2012.
———. 2010. Downtown Phoenix Code. April 3. http://phoenix.gov/urbanformproject/dtcode.html. Accessed July 6, 2012.
———. 2012. Proposal to update the downtown special event traffic management plan (Sunburst Plan). Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee meeting minutes, November 13, Phoenix City Council. http://phoenix.gov/webcms/groups/internet/@inter/@citygov/@publicnotice/documents/meeting_notices/091217.pdf. Accessed April 26, 2013.
———. n.d. Major reinvestment focus areas. City of Phoenix Community and Economic Development Department. http://phoenix.gov/econdev/reinvest/focus/index.html. Accessed April 18, 2013.
City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Office and Ryden Architects, Inc. (City of Phoenix HPO and RA). 2010. Midcentury marvels: Commercial architecture of Phoenix 1945–1975. Phoenix: City of Phoenix.
City of Phoenix and Maricopa County, Advance Planning Task Force. 1959. Land use of the Phoenix urban area: A study basic to long range planning. Phoenix: City of Phoenix and Maricopa County.
Clarke, Susan E., and Gary L. Gaile. 1997. Local politics in a global era: Thinking locally, acting globally. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 551 (1): 28–43.
DeFilippis, J. 1999. Alternatives to the ‘new urban politics’: Finding locality and autonomy in local economic development. Political Geography 18 (8): 973–990.
Downtown Voices Coalition (DVC). 2004. Downtown voices: Creating a sustainable downtown. Phoenix. http://www.downtownvoices.org. Accessed July 5, 2012.
———. 2011. Downtown voices: Creating a sustainable downtown 2010 and beyond: A six-year progress report. http://www.downtownvoices.org. Accessed July 5, 2012.
Flatten, Mark. 2010. Shifting the burden: Cities waive property taxes for favored businesses. Phoenix: Goldwater Institute. http://goldwaterinstitute.org/sites/default/files/Shifting%20the%20Burden.Final__0.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2012.
Florida, Richard. 2002. The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Perseus Book Group.
Frug, Gerald E. 1999. City making: Building communities without building walls. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gammage Jr., Grady. 2003. Phoenix in perspective: Reflections on developing the desert. Tempe, AZ: Herberger Center for Design Excellence, College of Architecture and Environmental Design, Arizona State University.
———. 2008. Arizona’s Proposition 207. Paper presented at the 11th annual CLE conference on litigating regulatory takings and other legal challenges to land use and environmental regulation, Stanford, CA.
Gibbs, David, and Rob Krueger. 2007. Containing the contradictions of rapid development? New economy spaces and sustainable urban development. In The sustainable development paradox: Urban political economy in the United States and Europe, ed. Rob Krueger and David Gibbs, 95–122. New York: Guilford.
Gober, Patricia. 2006. Metropolitan Phoenix: Place making and community building in the desert. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Kittrell, Katherine. 2012. Impacts of vacant land values: Comparison of metro light rail station areas in Phoenix, Arizona. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 3 (2276): 138–145.
Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
Leigh, Nancey Green. 2003. The state role in urban land redevelopment. Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. http://www.brookings.edu/es/urban/publications/leighvacant.pdf. Accessed July 9, 2012.
Logan, John R., and Harvey L. Molotch. 2007. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Luckingham, Bradford. 1989. Phoenix: The history of a southwest metropolis. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG). 2003a. Growing Smarter implementation project best practices paper no 5: Infill development. http://www.azmag.gov/Documents/pdf/cms.resource/Infill-development49065.pdf. Accessed April 26, 2013.
———. 2003b. Growing Smarter implementation project best practices paper no 6: Transit oriented development. http://www.azmag.gov/Documents/pdf/cms.resource/Best-Practices-Paper6-TOD84783.pdf. Accessed April 26, 2013.
Maricopa Regional Arts and Culture Task Force (MRAC), Metro Phoenix Partnership for Arts and Culture. 2004. Vibrant culture-thriving economy: Arts, culture, and prosperity in Arizona’s Valley of the Sun.
Markusen, Ann, and Gregory Schrock. 2006. The artistic dividend: Urban artistic specialization and economic development implications. Urban Studies 43 (10): 1661–1686.
Pendras, Mark. 2002. From local consciousness to global change: Asserting power at the local scale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 26 (4): 823–833.
Peterson, Paul E. 1981. City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ross, Andrew. 2011. Bird on fire: Lessons from the world’s least sustainable city. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
State of Arizona. 1996. Arizona Revised Statutes, title 42, chap. 6, article 5, no. 42–62: Government Property Lease Excise Tax. http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ArizonaRevisedStatutes.asp?Title=42. Accessed October 16, 2012.
———. n.d.-a. Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS), no. 36–1471. http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/36/01471.htm&Title=36&DocType=ARS. Accessed April 18, 2013.
———. n.d.-b. Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS), no. 42–6200, title 36, chapter 12, article 3. http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/36/01471.htm&Title=36&DocType=ARS. Accessed April 18, 2013.
Strom, Elizabeth. 2008. Rethinking the politics of downtown development. Journal of Urban Affairs 30 (1): 37–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stanley, B.W. (2017). A History of Property Development and Ownership in Downtown Phoenix. In: Transparent Urban Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58910-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58910-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58909-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58910-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)