• Bo Dahlin
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)


This chapter begins by describing how the first Waldorf school came about in Stuttgart in 1919, and the intentions behind it. The development of this alternative educational impulse into a worldwide movement is described shortly. In mainstream media today, Rudolf Steiner’s ideas in general, as well as in education, are often presented as controversial, because being perceived as un- or anti-scientific, mythological, or even racist. The misunderstandings behind these allegations are pointed out. The similarities and differences between Waldorf education and progressivism, or Reformpädagogik, are shortly discussed. Some reasons for the relative lack of academic research on Waldorf education are pointed out, and some examples of the reception of Steiner’s educational and philosophical ideas are given. Finally, there is an overview of the following chapters of the book.


Waldorf education Progressivism Reformpädagogik 


  1. Ashley, M. (2009). Education for freedom: The goal of Steiner/Waldorf schools. In P. A. Wood & G. J. Woods (Eds.), Alternative education for the 21st century: Philosophies, approaches, visions (pp. 209–225). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christakis, D. A. (2009). The effects of infant media usage: What do we know and what should we learn? Acta Paediatrica, 98, 8–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dahlin, B. (2009). On the path towards thinking: Learning from Martin Heidegger and Rudolf Steiner. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28(6), 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dahlin, B. (2013a). Poetizing our unknown childhood: Meeting the challenge of social constructivism. The Romantic philosophy of childhood and Steiner’s spiritual anthropology. RoSE: Research on Steiner Education, 4(1), 16–47.Google Scholar
  5. Dahlin, B. (2013b). A critical view of Heiner Ullrich’s critique of Rudolf Steiner’s philosophy of knowledge. RoSE: Research on Steiner Education, 4(1), 202–207.Google Scholar
  6. Dahlin, B. (2014). Review of Robert Rose: Transforming criticisms of anthroposophy and Waldorf education—Evolution, race and the quest for a global ethics. RoSE: Research on Steiner Education, 5(1), 156–159.Google Scholar
  7. Eftestøl, T. (2013). Steiner og Deleuze [Steiner and Deleuze], In T. Sparby (Ed.), Rudolf Steiner som filosof (pp. 317–380). Oslo: Pax Forlag.Google Scholar
  8. Ensign, J. (1996). A conversation between John Dewey and Rudolf Steiner: A comparison of Waldorf and progressive education. Educational Theory, 46(2), 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gidley, J. M. (2009). Educating for evolving consciousness: Voicing the emergency for love, life and wisdom. In M.D. Souza, L.J. Francis, J. O’Higgins-Norman, & D. Scott (Eds.), International handbook of education for spirituality, care and wellbeing (pp. 533–561). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Gidley, J. M. (2010). Turning tides. Creating dialogue between Rudolf Steiner and 21st century academic discourses. RoSE: Research on Steiner Education, 1(1), 101–107.Google Scholar
  11. Helsper, W., Ullrich, H., Stelmaszyk, B., Höblich, D., Graßhoff, G., & Jung, D. (2007). Autorität und Schule. Die empirische Rekonstruktion der Klassenlehrer-Schüler-Beziehung an Waldorfschulen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften [Authority and school. The empirical reconstruction of the classteacher-student relation in Waldorf schools].Google Scholar
  12. Kiersch, J. (2010). “Painted from a palette entirely different”. A new hermeneutic approach to Steiner’s esoteric courses for teachers. RoSE: Research on Steiner Education, 1(2), 64–72.Google Scholar
  13. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lejon, H. (1997). Historien om den antroposofiska humanismen: den antroposofiska bildningsidén i idéhistoriskt perpsektiv 1880–1980. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International [The history of anthroposophical humanism: The anthroposophical idea of Bildung in the history of ideas 1880–1980].Google Scholar
  15. Levinas, E. (1999). Alterity and transcendence. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
  16. Majorek, M. B. (2002). Objektivität: ein Erkenntnisideal auf dem Prüfstand. Rudolf Steiners Geisteswissenschaft als ein Ausweg aus der Sackgasse [Objectivity: A knowledge ideal on trial. Rudolf Steiner’s spiritual science as a way out of the return alley]. Tübingen: A. Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Majorek, M. B. (2010). Wissenschaftliche Objektivität und Rudolf Steiners Geisteswissenschaft [Scientific objectivity and Rudolf Steiner’s spiritual science]. In H. Paschen (Ed.), Erziehungswissenschaftliche Zugänge zur Waldorfpädagogik (pp. 35–58). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Majorek, M. B. (2015). Rudolf Steiners Geisteswissenschaft. Mythisches Denken oder Wissenschaft? [Rudolf Steiner’s spiritual science. Mythical thinking or science?]. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH + Co.Google Scholar
  19. Mansikka, J.-E. (2007). Om naturens förvandlingar. Vetenskap, kunskap och frihet i Rudolf Steiners tidiga tänkande. Om Waldorfpedagogikens idéhistoriska rötter [The transformations of nature. Science, knowledge, and freedom in Rudolf Steiner’s early thought. About the roots of Waldorf education]. Helsingfors: Pedagogiska institutionen, Helsingfors universitet.Google Scholar
  20. Nielsen, T. W. (2006). Towards a pedagogy of imagination: A phenomenological case study of holistic education. Ethnography and Education, 1(2), 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nobel, A. (1996). Educating through art: The Steiner school approach. Edinburgh: Floris Books.Google Scholar
  22. Oberski, I. (2006). Learning to think in Steiner-Waldorf schools. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 5(3), 336–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oberski, I. (2011). Rudolf Steiner’s philosophy of freedom as a basis for spiritual education? International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 16(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pattison, G. (2005). Preface. In J. Schickler (Ed.), Metaphysics as christology. An Odyssey of the self from Kant and Hegel to Steiner (pp. xi–xvi). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  25. Prange, K. (2000). Erziehung zur Anthroposofie. Darstellung und Kritik der Waldorfpädagogik [Education to anthroposophy. Presentation and critique of Waldorf education]. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
  26. Prokofieff, S. (2006). Anthroposophie und “Die Philosophie der Freiheit” [Anthroposophy and “The philosophy of freedom”]. Dornach: Verlag am Goetheanum.Google Scholar
  27. Randoll, D. (2010). Empirische Forschung und Waldorfpädagogik [Empirical research and Waldorf education]. In H. Paschen (Ed.), Erziehungswissenschaftliche Zugänge zur Waldorfpädagogik (pp. 127–156). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rose, R. (2013). Transforming criticisms of Anthroposophy and Waldorf education—Evolution, race and the quest for a global ethics. Centre for Philosophy and Anthroposophy, UK (E-book, available from the author at Scholar
  29. Scheibe, W. (1971). Die Reformpädagogische Bewegung [The Reformpädagogik movement]. Weinheim: Verlag Julius Beltz.Google Scholar
  30. Schickler, J. (2005). Metaphysics as christology. An Odyssey of the self from Kant and Hegel to Steiner. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  31. Schmelzer, A. (2016). Bemerkenswerte Praxis – dubiose Theorie? Zu Heiner Ullrichs Buch “Waldorfpädagogik. Eine kritische Einführung” [Remarkable praxis—Dubious theory? To Heiner Ullrich’s book “Waldorf education. A critical introduction]. RoSE: Research on Steiner Education, 7(2), 141–149.Google Scholar
  32. Sigman, A. (2007). Visual voodoo: The biological impact of watching TV. Biologist, 54(1), 12–17.Google Scholar
  33. Sijmons, J. (2008). Phänomenologie und Idealismus: Struktur und Methode der Philosophie Rudolf Steiners [Phenomenology and idealism: Structure and method of Rudolf Steiner’s philosophy]. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
  34. Skagen, K. (2015). Morgen ved midnatt: den unge Rudolf Steiners liv og samtid, verk og horisont 1861–1902 [Morning at midnight: The young Rudolf Steiner’s life and age, work and horizon 1861–1902]. Oslo: Vidarforlaget.Google Scholar
  35. Skiera, E. (2003). Reformpädagogik in Geschichte und Gegenwart [Reformpädagogik in history and present times]. München: R. Oldenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
  36. Sparby, T. (2016). Rudolf Steiner’s idea of freedom: As seen in the panorama of Hegel’s dialectic. Epoché, 21(1), 173–196.Google Scholar
  37. Speck, O. (2009). Hirnforschung und Erziehung. Eine pädagogische Auseinandersetzung mit neurobiologischen Erkenntnissen [Brain research and education. A pedagogical confrontation with neurobiological knowledge]. München: Reinhardt Ernst.Google Scholar
  38. Stabel, A.-M. (2014). Visjoner og vilkor. Om Steinerskolens vilkor i Norge fra 1926–2004 [Visions and conditions. About the conditions for the Steiner school in Norway from 1926–2004]. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  39. Steiner, R. (1986). Gegenwärtiges Geistesleben und Erziehung [Contemporary spiritual life and education]. (GA 307). Dornach: Rudolf Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  40. Steiner, R. (1989a). Education and modern spiritual life. (GA 307). Blauvelt, NY: Steiner Books.Google Scholar
  41. Steiner, R. (1989b). Die Geheimwißenschaft im Umriß [An outline of esoteric science]. (GA 13). Dornach: Rudolf Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  42. Steiner, R. (1999). Die spirituellen Hintergründe der äußeren Welt [The spiritual backgrounds to the external world]. (GA 177). Dornach: Rudolf Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  43. Steiner, R. (2011). Outline of occult science. (GA 13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Swarz, J. (2014). Allergy, stress and sense of coherence in families with children living in accordance with an anthroposophic lifestyle. [Diss.] Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
  45. Traub, H. (2011). Philosophie und Anthroposophie. Die philosophische Weltanschauung Rudolf Steiners. Grundlegung und Kritik [Philosophy and anthroposophy. Rudolf Steiner’s philosophical world view. Foundations and critique]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  46. Ullrich, H. (1994). Rudolf Steiner. Prospects, 24(3), 555–572. doi: 10.1007/bf02195288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ullrich, H. (1999). Das Kind als schöpferischer Ursprung [The child as creative origin]. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
  48. Ullrich, H. (2008). Rudolf Steiner. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  49. Ullrich, H. (2015). Waldorfpädagogik. Eine kritische Einführung [Waldorf education. A critical introduction]. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  50. Welburn, A. (2004). Rudolf Steiner’s philosophy and the crisis of contemporary thought. Edinburgh: Floris Books.Google Scholar
  51. Wiehl, A. (2015). Propädeutik der Unterrichtsmethoden in der Waldorfpädagogik [Propedeutics to the teaching methods in Waldorf education]. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  52. Woods, P., Ashley, M., & Woods, G. (2005). Steiner schools in England. Research Report RR645. Bristol: University of West England.Google Scholar
  53. Zander, H. (2011). Rudolf Steiner. Die Biographie [Rudolf Steiner. The biography]. München: Piper.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Karlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden

Personalised recommendations