Skip to main content
  • 671 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Van Loon and Wijsbek 2003.

  2. 2.

    Van Loon and Van Dijk 2015. Before 2015, the concept of Dialogical Leadership was explored in Van Loon, The Secret of Being a Leader. Searching for the Essence (2006), and summarized in a whitepaper , Van Loon, Dialogical Leader. Developing Leaders for the Future (2010). Other authors using the term Dialogische Führung are Dietz and Kracht (2011).

  3. 3.

    The inaugural address was delivered in Dutch.

  4. 4.

    Conference Board 2011. Leadership Essentials for 2020 and beyond.

  5. 5.

    Greenleaf 1970.

  6. 6.

    Goleman 1995.

  7. 7.

    Wheatley 1994.

  8. 8.

    Hill 2013.

  9. 9.

    Goleman 2000.

  10. 10.

    Gosling and Mintzberg 2003.

  11. 11.

    Kilburg and Donohue 2011.

  12. 12.

    Hickman 2016.

  13. 13.

    To demonstrate that good leadership has this double meaning of effective and ethical is a separate research project, that would be worthwhile to do for a Ph.D. student. As the two are separate, it is possible that we speak about good leadership in the sense of effectiveness, while not serving the common good (like in the financial crisis).

  14. 14.

    Hickman uses five terms next to another for members of an organization: organizational participants, followers, team-members, employees or associates. We have experienced that choosing the right expression in the relation leader-follower is critically important to not evoke the wrong associations (i.e. passivity in this role). See also: Koonce et al. 2016.

  15. 15.

    Gergen 2009a, 148.

  16. 16.

    Gergen 2009a, 149; Hersted and Gergen, 2013; Cunliffe and Eriksen 2011.

  17. 17.

    Hersted and Gergen 2013, 17.

  18. 18.

    Hersted and Gergen 2013, 20.

  19. 19.

    Hersted and Gergen 2013, 20.

  20. 20.

    Hersted and Gergen 2013, 21.

  21. 21.

    Baggini 2011, 126: “Thought and feeling are what matter does, when it is arranged in the remarkably complex way that brains are. Matter is all that is needed for them to exist, but they are not themselves lumps of matter. In this sense, “I is as verb dressed as a noun.” We are—in Baggini’s view—made up of nothing more than physical stuff, but to describe our true nature, you need more than just a physical vocabulary. “We are no more than, but more than just, matter.” (123).

  22. 22.

    Hawes 1999.

  23. 23.

    George 2003, 2007; Grint 2005, 2010a; Litaer 1993; Luthans and Avolio 2003.

  24. 24.

    Luthans and Avolio 2003, quoted in Parry 2011, 63.

  25. 25.

    Kernis 2003.

  26. 26.

    Northouse 2007, 347.

  27. 27.

    George 2007.

  28. 28.

    Van Loon 2006. Most important contributors are: Valuation Theory, Self-Confrontation Method, Hermans and Hermans-Jansen (1995) Dialogical Self Theory, Hermans and Gieser (2012); Hermans and Hermans-Konopka (2010), Institute of Dutch Quality, Van Loon and Roozendaal (2006) Leadership Theories and the epistemological theory of Ulrich Libbrecht (2007), and—of course—conversations with clients, individually, with their teams and the organization as a whole.

  29. 29.

    You can switch between these styles if there is ‘ma’, as a pause, as a significant silence in the internal and external relation. Here a process of distancing oneself from oneself starts, and new meaning and action can be generated. Creating free energy, flexibly switching between concentrating and deconcentrating, in a field of relation.

  30. 30.

    For the details, see Chap. 4. Creating Conditions for Generative Dialogue.

  31. 31.

    I use the word ‘empty’ here, as the content is filled in the conversation in an unique and singular way. It enables people to construct their self-narrative in a conceptually complete manner, as they are invited to reflect on the core elements applied to their own life and work as a leader and as a follower. If the reader is convinced of an element that is missing in the conceptual framework, you are invited to send an email to the author, as we continuously want to improve the concept.

  32. 32.

    See the illustrative case-studies in Chaps. 6 and 7.

  33. 33.

    Hermans et al. 1992.

  34. 34.

    Hermans and Hermans-Konopka 2010, 326.

  35. 35.

    “Metalogue reveals a conscious, intimate, and subtle relationship between the structure and content of an exchange and its meaning. The medium and the message are linked.” Isaacs 1993, 38.

  36. 36.

    Hermans 2006, 51. [Translated from the Dutch text].

  37. 37.

    Isaacs 1999.

  38. 38.

    Bohm 1996.

  39. 39.

    Goffee and Jones 2006.

  40. 40.

    Hermans and Konopka 2010, 330.

  41. 41.

    Gergen 2009a, 147.

  42. 42.

    Grint 2005 distinguishes between crises, tame and wicked issues.

  43. 43.

    Ford and Ford 1995.

  44. 44.

    This refers to a mode of realizing activity in between active and passive, a participative mode (Bohm 1996, 96–109). A participative mode is crucial for describing the atmosphere in a dialogue in an appropriate way. Cf. what was mentioned before about field awareness and deconcentrated energy by Libbrecht (2007).

  45. 45.

    Problems: what to do, either ↔ or? Puzzles: how to solve on a continuum of either ↔ or? Polarity: how to solve simultaneously in two opposing directions?

  46. 46.

    Keller and Price 2011, 213.

  47. 47.

    See Sect. 5.7 for an extensive description of this case.

  48. 48.

    In Sect. 4.6.2 the roles of change leader, and professional will be described and discussed more in detail.

  49. 49.

    Q = P/P + N × 100. P = sum total of positive feelings; N = sum total of negative feelings; Q = general positive quality. The higher the number, the more positive the sentence is experienced (here 88).

  50. 50.

    I use Raggatts ordering in the handbook of Dialogical Self Theory (2012, 31).

References

  • Baggini, J. (2011). The ego trick. What does it mean to be you? London: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe, A. L., & Eriksen, M. (2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64(11), 1425–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, K.-M., & Kracht, T. (2011). Dialogische Führung. Grundlagen—Praxis—Beispiel: dm Drogerie—Markt. Frankfurt am Main: Campus-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J.D., & Ford, L.W. (1995). The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations. Academy of Management Review. 20, 541–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. New Jersey: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, B. (2007). True north: Discover your authentic leadership. New Jersey: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2009a). An invitation to social construction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2009b). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2006). Why should anyone be led by you? What it takes to be an authentic leader. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, J., & Mintzberg, H. (2003). The five minds of a manager. Harvard Business Review, 81(11), 54–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R.K. (1970). The Servant as Leader. Center for Servant Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K. (2005). Problems, problems, problems: the social construction of “leadership”. Human Relations, 58, 1467–1494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K. (2010a). Wicked problems and clumsy solutions: The role of leadership. In S. Brookes & K. Grint (Eds.), The public new leadership challenge (pp. 169–186). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawes, L. C. (1999). The dialogics of conversation: Power, control, vulnerability. Communication Theory, 9(3), 229–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M. (2006). Dialoog en Misverstand. Leven met de toenemende bevolking van onze innerlijke ruimte. [Dialogue and Misunderstanding] Soest: Uitgeverij Nelissen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory. positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., Kempen, H. J. G., & Van Loon, E. (Rens) J. P. (1992). The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersted, L., & Gergen, K. J. (2013). Relational leading. practices for dialogically based collaboration. Chagrin Falls, Ohio: TAOS Institute Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, G. R. (2016). Leading organizations: Perspectives for a new era. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. (2013). ‘The monday interview’ with charles handy, ‘charles handy: Righting management wrongs’. Financial Times, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, W. N. (1993). Taking flight: Dialogue, collective thinking and organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, W. N. (1999). Dialogue and the art of thinking together. A pioneering approach to communicating in business and in life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S., & Price, C. (2011). Beyond performance: How great organizations build ultimate competitive advantage. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilburg, R., & Donohue, M. (2011). Toward a “grand unifying theory’ of leadership: Implications for consulting psychology. In Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63(1), 6–25. American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koonce, R. (2016). All in “The family”: Leading and following through individual, relational, and collective mindsets. In R. Koonce, M. C. Bligh, M. K. Carsten & M. Hurwitz (Eds.), Followership in action. cases and commentaries (pp. 3–14). Emerald Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libbrecht, U. (2007). Within the four seas…: introduction to comparative philosophy. Belgium: Peeters Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litaer, G. (1993). Authenticity, congruence and transparency. In D. Brazier (Ed.), Beyond carl rogers (pp. 17–46). London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. (2003). Authentic leadership development. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241–258). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, K. W. (2011). Leadership and organization theory. In A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of leadership (pp. 53–70). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raggatt, P. T. F. (2012). Positioning the dialogical self: recent advances in theory construction. In H. J. M. Hermans & Th. Gieser (Eds.), Handbook of dialogical self theory (pp. 29–45). Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, F., (1970). Patton [Movie]

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon, E. (Rens) J. P. (2006). Het geheim van de leider. Zoektocht naar essentie. (The secret of being a leader. Searching for the essence.) Assen: Van Gorcum. [Available as pdf file in English translation].

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon, E. (Rens) J. P. (2010). Dialogical leader. Developing leaders for the future. Deloitte University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon, E. (Rens) J. P., & Van Dijk, G. (2015). Dialogical Leadership. Dialogue as Condition Zero. Journal for Leadership Accountability and Ethics, 12(3), 62–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon, E. (Rens) J. P., & Roozendaal, A. (2006). Leiderschap als kunst. Moed om te veranderen. (The Art of Leadership. Courage to Change). Zaltbommel: INK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon, E. (Rens) J. P., & Wijsbek, J. (2003). De organisatie als verhaal. Dialoog en reflectie als uitgangspunt voor ontwikkeling van organisaties, leiders, teams en medewerkers. (The Organization as a Narrative. Dialogue and Reflection as a startingpoint for developing Organizations, Leaders, Teams and Employees). Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, M. J. (1994). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a Chaotic world. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rens van Loon .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Loon, R. (2017). Dialogical Leadership. In: Creating Organizational Value through Dialogical Leadership . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58889-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics