Advertisement

On the White Scale Model (Un)Purpose…

  • João Miguel Couto DuarteEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

White scale models appear as a regular representation in architecture’s teaching: the unique material allows a student to better focus on his/her work, facilitating design’s learning. Although it may seems convenient, this adoption of white scale models deludes its representational nature. Acknowledging three underlying misconceptions related to the adoption of white scale models—its natural adequacy to express though; its negative value in regards of the difference between representation and its object; the subsidiarity of representation towards thought—, it will be revaluated the impact of representation on thought and the way it should be considered in architecture’s teaching.

Keywords

Architectural scale model Misconceptions Architectural representation 

References

  1. Alberti, Leon Battista. [1485] 1986. The ten books of architecture. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Dunn, Nick. 2007. The ecology of the architectural model. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  3. Gänshirt, Christian. 2007. Tools for ideas an introduction to architectural design. Basel, Boston, Berlin: Birkhäuser Verlag AG.Google Scholar
  4. Goodman, Nelson. [1968] 1976. Languages of Art, an approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  5. Janeiro, Pedro. 2010. Origens e Destino da Imagem; para uma fenomenologia da Arquitectura Imaginada. Lisboa: Chiado Editora.Google Scholar
  6. Moon, Karen. 2005. Modeling messages the architect and the model. New York: The Monacelli Press.Google Scholar
  7. Selenitsch, Alex. 2007. Small real large. Em Burry and Mark e outros, eds. Homo Faber: Modelling Architecture. 4–9. SIAL and the Melbourne Museum. Melbourne, Sydney: Archadia Press.Google Scholar
  8. Smith, Albert. 2004. Architectural model as machine: A new view of models from antiquity to the present day. Oxford: Elsevier Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  9. Úbeda Blanco, Marta. 2002. La Maqueta como Experiencia del Espacio Arquitectónico. Secretariado de Publicaciones e Intercambio Editorial Universidad de Valladolid. Valladolid.Google Scholar
  10. Zumthor, Peter. [1999] 2006. Thinking Architecture. Basel: Birkhauser.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CITAD—Centro de Investigação em Território Arquitectura e DesignFaculdade de Arquitectura e Artes da Universidade Lusíada de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations