Abstract
Aim of the paper is to present how new technologies favor the so called “Graphical Analysis” process, i.e. the historical critical study of the architectural heritage through its re-presentation. The growth of digital technologies has affected disciplines involved in architectural studies, and computer based visualization has found in digital modeling an interpretative instrument for architectural heritage study and representation. 3D models can support a renewal of the graphical analysis and, from an educational point of view, the development of critical skills for understanding and communication of architectural characteristics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Ackoff, Russel L. 1989. From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied System Analysis. 16: 3–9.
Albisinni, Piero, and Emanuela, Chiavoni. 2014. Esperienze e riflessioni sul disegno dell’architettura. Roma: Aracne.
Albisinni, Piero, and Laura, De Carlo (ed). 2001. Architettura Disegno Modello. Roma: Gangemi.
Apollonio, Fabrizio Ivan. 2012. Architettura in 3D. Bruno Mondadori. Milano-Torino.
Brusaporci, Stefano. 2015. On visual computing for architectural heritage. In BRUSAPORCI, Stefano (ed). Handbook of research on emerging digital tools for architectural surveying, modeling, and representation, 94–123. Hershey (PA): IGI Global.
Brusaporci, Stefano. 2013. Modellazione e rappresentazione digitale per i beni architettonici. In Brusaporci, Stefano, ed. Modelli complessi per il patrimonio architettonico-urbano, 18–24. Roma: Gangemi.
Calvano, Michele, and Elena, Ippoliti. 2015. Communicat ing the city and its images. Two case studies for the reintegration of Littoria’s imaginary forma urbis. In Anna, Marotta and Giuseppa, Novello, eds. Drawing & City. Roma: Gangemi.
Centofanti, Mario, Brusaporci, Stefano, and Vittorio, Lucchese. 2014. Architectural heritage and 3D models. In Di Giamberardino, Paolo, Daniela, Iacoviello, Natal, Jorge, Joao Manuel, Tavares, eds. Computational modeling of objects presented in images, 31–49. Geneva: Springer.
Docci, Mario et al. 1983. Disegno e analisi architettonica. Roma: Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Dipartimento di Rappresentazione e Rilievo.
Docci, Mario. 1989. Disegno e rilievo: quale didattica? Disegnare idee immagini, 37–54.
Fasolo, Vincenzo. 1954. Guida metodica per lo studio della Storia dell’Architettura. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.
Fasolo, Vincenzo. (post) 1955. Analisi grafica dei valori architettonici. Roma: Università di Roma, Facoltà di Architettura, Istituto di Storia dell’Architettura.
Migliari, Riccardo. 2008. Prospettiva dinamica interattiva. Roma: Kappa.
Murray, Janet. 2012. Inventing the medium. Principles of interaction design as a cultural practice. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
Pallasmaa, Juhani. 2009. The thinking hand: existential and embodied wisdom in architecture. Chichester: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brusaporci, S. (2018). Graphical Analysis 2.0: Digital Representation for Understanding and Communication of Architecture. In: Castaño Perea, E., Echeverria Valiente, E. (eds) Architectural Draughtsmanship. EGA 2016. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58856-8_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58856-8_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58855-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58856-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)