Graphical Analysis 2.0: Digital Representation for Understanding and Communication of Architecture

  • Stefano BrusaporciEmail author
Conference paper


Aim of the paper is to present how new technologies favor the so called “Graphical Analysis” process, i.e. the historical critical study of the architectural heritage through its re-presentation. The growth of digital technologies has affected disciplines involved in architectural studies, and computer based visualization has found in digital modeling an interpretative instrument for architectural heritage study and representation. 3D models can support a renewal of the graphical analysis and, from an educational point of view, the development of critical skills for understanding and communication of architectural characteristics.


Graphical analysis 3D modeling Digital representation Interpretation Presentation 


  1. Ackoff, Russel L. 1989. From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied System Analysis. 16: 3–9.Google Scholar
  2. Albisinni, Piero, and Emanuela, Chiavoni. 2014. Esperienze e riflessioni sul disegno dell’architettura. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
  3. Albisinni, Piero, and Laura, De Carlo (ed). 2001. Architettura Disegno Modello. Roma: Gangemi.Google Scholar
  4. Apollonio, Fabrizio Ivan. 2012. Architettura in 3D. Bruno Mondadori. Milano-Torino.Google Scholar
  5. Brusaporci, Stefano. 2015. On visual computing for architectural heritage. In BRUSAPORCI, Stefano (ed). Handbook of research on emerging digital tools for architectural surveying, modeling, and representation, 94–123. Hershey (PA): IGI Global.Google Scholar
  6. Brusaporci, Stefano. 2013. Modellazione e rappresentazione digitale per i beni architettonici. In Brusaporci, Stefano, ed. Modelli complessi per il patrimonio architettonico-urbano, 18–24. Roma: Gangemi.Google Scholar
  7. Calvano, Michele, and Elena, Ippoliti. 2015. Communicat ing the city and its images. Two case studies for the reintegration of Littoria’s imaginary forma urbis. In Anna, Marotta and Giuseppa, Novello, eds. Drawing & City. Roma: Gangemi.Google Scholar
  8. Centofanti, Mario, Brusaporci, Stefano, and Vittorio, Lucchese. 2014. Architectural heritage and 3D models. In Di Giamberardino, Paolo, Daniela, Iacoviello, Natal, Jorge, Joao Manuel, Tavares, eds. Computational modeling of objects presented in images, 31–49. Geneva: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Docci, Mario et al. 1983. Disegno e analisi architettonica. Roma: Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Dipartimento di Rappresentazione e Rilievo.Google Scholar
  10. Docci, Mario. 1989. Disegno e rilievo: quale didattica? Disegnare idee immagini, 37–54.Google Scholar
  11. Fasolo, Vincenzo. 1954. Guida metodica per lo studio della Storia dell’Architettura. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
  12. Fasolo, Vincenzo. (post) 1955. Analisi grafica dei valori architettonici. Roma: Università di Roma, Facoltà di Architettura, Istituto di Storia dell’Architettura.Google Scholar
  13. Migliari, Riccardo. 2008. Prospettiva dinamica interattiva. Roma: Kappa.Google Scholar
  14. Murray, Janet. 2012. Inventing the medium. Principles of interaction design as a cultural practice. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Pallasmaa, Juhani. 2009. The thinking hand: existential and embodied wisdom in architecture. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Edile-Architettura e AmbientaleUniversità dell’AquilaL’AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations