Abstract
Intensity-based registration algorithms have been widely used in medical image applications. This type of registration algorithms uses an object function to compute a transformation and optimizes a measure of similarity between the images being registered. The most common similarity metrics used in registration are sum of squared differences, mutual information and normalized cross-correlation. This paper aims to compare these similarity metrics, using common registration algorithms applied to breast density maps registration. To evaluate the results, we use the protocols for evaluation of similarity measures proposed by Škerl et al. They consist in defining a set of random directions in the parameter space of the registration algorithm and compute statistical measures, such as the accuracy, capture range, number of maxima and risk of non-convergence, along these directions. The obtained results show a better performance corresponding to normalized cross-correlation for the rigid registration algorithm, while the sum of squared difference obtains the best result for the B-Spline method.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
References
Crum, W.R., Hartkens, T., Hill, D.: Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. Br. J. Radiol. 77, 140–153 (2004)
Diez, Y., Oliver, A., Lladó, X., Freixenet, J., Martí, J., Vilanova, J.C., Martí, R.: Revisiting intensity-based image registration appplied to mammography. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 15(5), 716–725 (2011)
Guo, Y., Sivaramakrishna, R., Lu, C.C., Suri, J.S., Laxminarayan, S.: Breast image registration techniques: a survey. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 44(1–2), 15–26 (2006)
Hill, D.L., Batchelor, P.G., Holden, M., Hawkes, D.J.: Medical image registration. Phys. Med. Biol. 46(3), R1 (2001)
Maintz, J.A., Viergever, M.A.: A survey of medical image registration. Med. Image Anal. 2(1), 1–36 (1998)
Roche, A., Malandain, G., Ayache, N.: Unifying maximum likelihood approaches in medical image registration. Ph.D. thesis, Inria (1999)
Rueckert, D., Schnabel, J.A.: Medical image registration. In: Deserno, T.M. (ed.) Biomedical Image Processing. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, pp. 131–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Škerl, D., Likar, B., Pernus, F.: A protocol for evaluation of similarity measures for rigid registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25(6), 779–791 (2006)
Škerl, D., Likar, B., Pernus, F.: A protocol for evaluation of similarity measures for non-rigid registration. Med. Image Anal. 12, 42–54 (2008)
Acknowledgement
This research has been partially supported from the University of Girona (MPC UdG 2016/022 grant) and the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain, under project SMARTER (DPI2015-68442-R) and the FPI grant BES-2013-065314.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
García, E. et al. (2017). Similarity Metrics for Intensity-Based Registration Using Breast Density Maps. In: Alexandre, L., Salvador Sánchez, J., Rodrigues, J. (eds) Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. IbPRIA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10255. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58838-4_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58838-4_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58837-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58838-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)