Participatory Evaluation of Productivity, Fertility Management, and Dissemination of Irrigated Exotic Vegetables in the Sahel, West Africa

  • A. K. Saidou
  • Hide Omae
  • Kimio Osuga
  • Boukary Absatou
  • Satoshi Tobita


On-farm participatory experiments and activities were carried out for 3 years at three sites in the Fakara district of western Niger to demonstrate, verify, and evaluate crop productivity due to fertilizer application, economic benefits, and the dissemination of crop technology. We tested combinations of manure and mineral fertilizer on 13 exotic vegetables: bell pepper, cabbage, carrot, chili, eggplant, lettuce, melon, onion, potato, pumpkin, sweet potato, tomato, and zucchini. Farmers’ selectivity was evaluated as the number of plots that farmers selected to carry out their own trials. The application of 110 kg N ha−1 manure plus 13.7 kg N ha−1 mineral fertilizer increased overall vegetable yields by 161% (P < 0.01). The improvement of soil fertility increased the yield of subsequent rainfed millet by 124% (P < 0.05). Less-experienced female farmers could afford to grow cabbage, onion, lettuce, potato, and pumpkin, which yielded 4.8–11.4 t ha−1 fresh weight. Daily management by women in the vegetable gardens gave regular opportunities to chat and thus disseminate the technology.


Integrated soil fertility management Participatory approach Irrigated vegetable production Sahel Niger West Africa 


  1. Diogo, R. V. C., Buerkert, A., & Schlecht, E. (2010). Fertilizer micro-dosing for the prosperity of small-scale farmers in the Sahel. Final report, Global Theme on Agro ecosystems Report No. 23, ICRISAT, Niamey, Niger. Niger Nutrient Cycling in Agro Ecosystems, 87, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Drechsel, P., & Keraita, B. (2014). Irrigated urban vegetable production in Ghana, characteristics, benefits and risk mitigation (2nd ed.). Colombo: International Water Management Institute (IWMI).Google Scholar
  3. Drechsel, P., Giordano, M., & Gyele, L. (2004) Valuing nutrients in soil and water: concepts and techniques with examples from IWMI studies in the developing world. Research report 82. Colombo, International Water Management Institute, 41.Google Scholar
  4. FAOSTAT. [homepage on the Internet]. FAO.
  5. Graefe, S., Schlecht, E., & Buerkert, A. (2008). Opportunities and challenges of urban and peri-urban agriculture in Niamey. Outlook Agriculture, 37, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grieco, M., & Apt, N. A. (2008). Gender and agriculture in the Africa: The ‘expert’ neglect of local practice. The change page: Gender and agriculture.
  7. Hiernaux, P., & Ayantunde, A. (2004). The Fakara: a semi-arid agro ecosystem under stress. Report of research activities, First phase (July 2002–June 2004) of the DMP-GEF Program. International Livestock Research Institute.Google Scholar
  8. ICRISAT. (2001). Grey to green revolution. ICRISAT annual report. Ratancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India. 1–48.Google Scholar
  9. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2000). Gender perspective: Focus on the rural poor. Rome: IFAD.Google Scholar
  10. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2001). Assessment of rural poverty: Western and Central Africa. Rome: IFAD.Google Scholar
  11. Khai, N. M., Ha, P. O., & Oborn, I. (2007). Nutrient flows in small-scale peri-urban vegetable farming systems in Southeast Asia: A case study in Hanoi. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 122, 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kinkingninboun-Medagbe, F. M., Diagne, A., Simtowe, F., Agboh-Noameshie, A. R., & Adegbola, P. Y. (2010). Gender discrimination and its impact on income, productivity, and technical efficiency: evidence from Benin. Agriculture and Human Values, 27, 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lesschen, J. P., Stoorvogel, J. J., Smaling, E. M., Heuvelink, G. B. M., & Veldkamp, A. (2007). A spatially explicit methodology to quantify soil nutrient balances and their uncertainties at the national level. Nutrient Cycling in Agro Ecosystems, 78, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Omae, H., Saidou, A. K., & Tobita, S. (2014). On-farm evaluation of effect of organic and mineral fertilizers on biomass and yield of millet/cowpea intercrop in the Sahel, West Africa. Journal of Life Science, 8, 582–592.Google Scholar
  15. Oudwater, N., & Martin, A. (2003). Methods and issues in exploring local knowledge of soils. Geoderma, 111, 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Quisumbing, A. R., & Pandolffeli, L. (2010). Promising approaches to address the needs of poor female farmers: Resources, constraints, and in terventions. World Development, 38, 581–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reddy, K. S., Mohanty, M., Rao, D.L.N., Rao, A. S., Blamey, F. P. C., Dalal, R.C., Dixit, S. K., Pandey, M., & Menzies, N. W. (2010). Developent of farmers’ participatory integrated nutrient management technology using the Mother – Baby trial approach, World congress of soil science, soil solutions for a changing world, Brisbane. August 1–6, 2010, Published on DVD, 87–90.Google Scholar
  18. Sander, J. H., & Shapiro, B. (2003). Crop technology introduction in semi-arid Sub-Saharan Africa: Performance and future strategy. Journal of Production, 9, 559–592.Google Scholar
  19. Sangare, S. K., Compaore, E., Buerkert, A., Vanclooster, M., Sedogo, M. P., & Bielders, C. L. (2007). Field-scale analysis of water and nutrient use efficiency for vegetable production in a West African urban agriculture system. Nutrient Cycling in Agro ecosystems, 92, 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schlecht, E., & Hiernaux, F. F. (2004). Beyond adding up inputs and outputs: process assessment and up scaling in modeling nutrient flows. Nutrient Cycle and Agroecosystem, 70, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Snapp, S. (2002). Quantifying farmer evaluation of technologies: The mother and baby trial design. In M. R. Bellon & J. Reeves (Eds.), Quantiative analysis of data from participatory methods in plant breeding. Mexico: CYMMYT.Google Scholar
  22. Stoorvogel, J. J., Smaling, E. M. A., & Janseen, B. H. (1993). Calculating soil nutrient balances in Africa at different scales. I- supranational scale. Fertilizer Research, 35, 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tabo, R., Bationo, A., Maimouna, D. K., Hassane O., & Koala, S. (2006) Fertilizer micro-dosing for the prosperity of small-scale farmers in the Sahel. Final report, Global Theme on Agro ecosystems Report No. 23, ICRISAT, Niamey, Niger.Google Scholar
  24. Thompson, R. B., Martinez-Gailan, C., Gallardo, M., Gimenez, C., & Fernandez, M. D. (2007). Identification of irrigation and N management practices that contribute to nitrate leaching loss from an intensive vegetable production system by use of comprehensive survey. Agricultural Water Management, 89, 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ward, C., Ballif-Spanvill, B., Fuhriman, A., Solomon, Y., & Widdison-Jones, K. (2004). Weeding out failed practices: A case study of community gardens in rural Mali. Human Ecology, 32, 509–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weinberger, K., & Lumpkin, T. A. (2007). Diversification into horticulture and poverty reduction: A research agenda. World Development, 35, 1464–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhu, J. H., Li, X. L., Christie, P., & Li, J. L. (2005). Environmental implications of low nitrogen use efficiency in excessively fertilized hot pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.) cropping systems. Ecosystems and Environment Ecosystems and Environment, 111, 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. Saidou
    • 1
  • Hide Omae
    • 2
  • Kimio Osuga
    • 3
  • Boukary Absatou
    • 1
  • Satoshi Tobita
    • 4
  1. 1.National Institute of Agronomic Research of Niger (INRAN)NiameyNiger
  2. 2.Japan Agriculture Research Front (JARF), Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS)IshigakiJapan
  3. 3.Rural Development Division, JIRCASTsukubaJapan
  4. 4.Crop, Livestock and Environment Division, JIRCASTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations