Abstract
We show that the open problem of the existence of a p-optimal proof system for SAT can be characterized in terms of total nondeterministic Turing machines. We prove that there exists a p-optimal proof system for SAT if and only if there exists a proof system h for SAT such that for any total nondeterministic Turing machine working in polynomial time its totality is provable with short proofs in h and these proofs can be efficiently constructed. We prove that the standard proof system for SAT (a satisfying truth assignment is a proof of a satisfiable propositional formula) is p-optimal if and only if for any total nondeterministic Turing machine working in polynomial time its totality is provable with short proofs in the standard proof system for SAT and these proofs can be efficiently constructed.
Additionally we show that the problem of the existence of an optimal proof system for TAUT can be characterized in terms of pairs of nondeterministic Turing machines which are disjoint (do not accept the same strings). We prove that there exists an optimal proof system for TAUT if and only if there exists a proof system f for TAUT such that for any pair of disjoint nondeterministic Turing machines working in polynomial time their disjointness is provable in f with short proofs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Balcazar, J., Díaz, J., Gabarró, J.: Structural Complexity I. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
Beyersdorff, O.: Classes of representable disjoint NP-pairs. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 377, 93–109 (2007)
Beyersdorff, O.: Tuples of disjoint NP-sets. Theory Comput. Syst. 43(2), 118–135 (2008)
Beyersdorff, O., Köbler, J., Messner, J.: Nondeterministic functions and the existence of optimal proof systems. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 410, 3839–3855 (2009)
Beyersdorff, O., Sadowski, Z.: Do there exist complete sets for promise classes? Math. Logic Q. 57(6), 535–550 (2011)
Cook, S.: The complexity of theorem proving procedures. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 151–158 (1971)
Cook, S., Reckhow, R.: The relative efficiency of propositional proof systems. J. Symbolic Logic 44, 36–50 (1979)
Fenner, S., Fortnow, L., Naik, A., Rogers, J.: Inverting onto functions. Inf. Comput. 186, 90–103 (2003)
Köbler, J., Messner, J.: Complete problems for promise classes by optimal proof systems for test sets. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity CCC 1998, pp. 132–140 (1998)
Köbler, J., Messner, J., Torán, J.: Optimal proof systems imply complete sets for promise classes. Inf. Comput. 184(1), 71–92 (2003)
Krajíček, J., Pudlák, P.: Propositional proof systems, the consistency of first order theories and the complexity of computations. J. Symbolic Logic 54, 1063–1079 (1989)
Messner, J.: On optimal algorithms and optimal proof systems. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, pp. 541–550. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). doi:10.1007/3-540-49116-3_51
Pudlák, P.: Incompleteness in the finite domain. The Czech Academy of Science, Institute of Mathematics, Preprint No. 5–2016, Praha (2016)
Razborov, A.: On provably disjoint NP-pairs. Technical report 94–006, ECCC (1994)
Sadowski, Z.: On an optimal quantified propositional proof system and a complete language for NP \(\cap \) co-NP. In: Chlebus, B.S., Czaja, L. (eds.) FCT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1279, pp. 423–428. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). doi:10.1007/BFb0036203
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the anonymous referees for all their helpful comments on how to improve the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sadowski, Z. (2017). Total Nondeterministic Turing Machines and a p-optimal Proof System for SAT. In: Kari, J., Manea, F., Petre, I. (eds) Unveiling Dynamics and Complexity. CiE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10307. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58741-7_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58741-7_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58740-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58741-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)