Abstract
We prove upper and lower bounds on the effective content and logical strength for a variety of natural restrictions of Hindman’s Finite Sums Theorem. For example, we show that Hindman’s Theorem for sums of length at most 2 and 4 colors implies \(\mathsf {ACA}_0\). An emerging leitmotiv is that the known lower bounds for Hindman’s Theorem and for its restriction to sums of at most 2 elements are already valid for a number of restricted versions which have simple proofs and better computability- and proof-theoretic upper bounds than the known upper bound for the full version of the theorem. We highlight the role of a sparsity-like condition on the solution set, which we call apartness.
Part of this work was done while the first author was visiting the Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore in 2016. The visit was supported by the Institute. The second author was partially supported by Polish National Science Centre grant no. 2013/09/B/ST1/04390. The fourth author was partially supported by University Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński in Warsaw grant UmoPBM-26/16.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The Finite Unions Theorem states that every coloring of the finite non-empty sets of \(\mathbf {N}\) admits an infinite and pairwise unmeshed family H of finite non-empty sets (sometimes called a block sequence) such that every finite non-empty union of elements of H is of the same color. Two finite non-empty subsets x, y of \(\mathbf {N}\) are unmeshed if either \(\max {x}<\min {y}\) or \(\max {y}<\min {x}\). Note that Hindman’s Theorem is equivalent to the Finite Unions Theorem only if the pairwise unmeshed condition is present.
- 3.
Note that the latter result is not present in the diagram in [11]. \(\mathsf {D}^2_2\), defined in [7], is the following assertion: For every 0, 1-valued function f(x, s) for which a \(\lim _{s\rightarrow \infty }f(x,s)\) exists for each x, there is an infinite set H and a \(k<2\) such that for all \(h\in H\) we have \(\lim _{s\rightarrow \infty }f(h,s)=k\).
- 4.
We thank Ludovic Patey for pointing out to us the results implying strictness.
References
Blass, A.: Some questions arising from Hindman’s theorem. Sci. Math. Japonicae 62, 331–334 (2005)
Blass, A.R., Hirst, J.L., Simpson, S.G.: Logical analysis of some theorems of combinatorics and topological dynamics. In: Logic and Combinatorics (Arcata, California, 1985), Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 65, pp. 125–156. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1987)
Carlucci, L.: A weak variant of Hindman’s Theorem stronger than Hilbert’s Theorem. Preprint (2016). https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05445
Carlucci, L.: Weak yet strong restrictions of Hindman’s finite sums theorem. In: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. Preprint (2016). https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.07500. Accepted with minor revision for publication
Carlucci, L.: Bounded Hindman’s theorem and increasing polarized Ramsey’s theorem. In: Nies, A. (ed.) Logic Blog, Part 4, Section 9 (2016). https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.01573
Carlucci, L., Zdanowski, K.: The strength of Ramsey’s theorem for coloring relatively large sets. J. Symbolic Logic 79(1), 89–102 (2014)
Cholak, P.A., Jockusch, C.G., Slaman, T.A.: On the strength of Ramsey’s theorem for pairs. J. Symbolic Logic 66(1), 1–55 (2001)
Chong, C.T., Lempp, S., Yang, Y.: On the role of the collection principle for \(\varSigma ^0_2\) formulas in second-order reverse mathematics. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 138, 1093–1100 (2010)
Chong, C.T., Slaman, T.A., Yang, Y.: The metamathematics of the stable Ramsey’s theorem for pairs. J. Am. Math. Soc. 27, 863–892 (2014)
Dzhafarov, D.D.: Cohesive avoidance and strong reductions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 143, 869–876 (2015)
Dzhafarov, D.D., Hirst, J.L.: The polarized Ramsey’s theorem. Arch. Math. Logic 48(2), 141–157 (2011)
Dzhafarov, D.D., Jockusch, C.G., Solomon, R., Westrick, L.B.: Effectiveness of Hindman’s theorem for bounded sums. In: Day, A., Fellows, M., Greenberg, N., Khoussainov, B., Melnikov, A., Rosamond, F. (eds.) Computability and Complexity. LNCS, vol. 10010, pp. 134–142. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50062-1_11
Hàjek, P., Pudlàk, P.: Metamathematics of First-Order Arithmetic. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Hindman, N.: The existence of certain ultrafilters on \(N\) and a conjecture of Graham and Rothschild. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 36(2), 341–346 (1972)
Hindman, N.: Finite sums from sequences within cells of a partition of N. J. Comb. Theory Ser. A 17, 1–11 (1974)
Hindman, N., Leader, I., Strauss, D.: Open problems in partition regularity. Comb. Probab. Comput. 12, 571–583 (2003)
Hirschfeldt, D.R.: Slicing the Truth (On the Computable and Reverse Mathematics of Combinatorial Principles). Lecture Notes Series, vol. 28, Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore (2014)
Hirst, J.: Hilbert vs. Hindman. Arch. Math. Logic 51(1–2), 123–125 (2012)
Montalbán, A.: Open questions in Reverse Mathematics. Bull. Symbolic Logic 17(3), 431–454 (2011)
Simpson, S.: Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009). Association for Symbolic Logic
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Carlucci, L., Kołodziejczyk, L.A., Lepore, F., Zdanowski, K. (2017). New Bounds on the Strength of Some Restrictions of Hindman’s Theorem. In: Kari, J., Manea, F., Petre, I. (eds) Unveiling Dynamics and Complexity. CiE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10307. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58741-7_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58741-7_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58740-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58741-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)