Skip to main content

New Bounds on the Strength of Some Restrictions of Hindman’s Theorem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Unveiling Dynamics and Complexity (CiE 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10307))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We prove upper and lower bounds on the effective content and logical strength for a variety of natural restrictions of Hindman’s Finite Sums Theorem. For example, we show that Hindman’s Theorem for sums of length at most 2 and 4 colors implies \(\mathsf {ACA}_0\). An emerging leitmotiv is that the known lower bounds for Hindman’s Theorem and for its restriction to sums of at most 2 elements are already valid for a number of restricted versions which have simple proofs and better computability- and proof-theoretic upper bounds than the known upper bound for the full version of the theorem. We highlight the role of a sparsity-like condition on the solution set, which we call apartness.

Part of this work was done while the first author was visiting the Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore in 2016. The visit was supported by the Institute. The second author was partially supported by Polish National Science Centre grant no. 2013/09/B/ST1/04390. The fourth author was partially supported by University Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński in Warsaw grant UmoPBM-26/16.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The principle \(B\varSigma _2^0\) is used in the proof of the implication Corollary 2.4 in [12], as indicated in the final version of Dzhafarov et al. paper – our reference [12].

  2. 2.

    The Finite Unions Theorem states that every coloring of the finite non-empty sets of \(\mathbf {N}\) admits an infinite and pairwise unmeshed family H of finite non-empty sets (sometimes called a block sequence) such that every finite non-empty union of elements of H is of the same color. Two finite non-empty subsets xy of \(\mathbf {N}\) are unmeshed if either \(\max {x}<\min {y}\) or \(\max {y}<\min {x}\). Note that Hindman’s Theorem is equivalent to the Finite Unions Theorem only if the pairwise unmeshed condition is present.

  3. 3.

    Note that the latter result is not present in the diagram in [11]. \(\mathsf {D}^2_2\), defined in [7], is the following assertion: For every 0, 1-valued function f(xs) for which a \(\lim _{s\rightarrow \infty }f(x,s)\) exists for each x, there is an infinite set H and a \(k<2\) such that for all \(h\in H\) we have \(\lim _{s\rightarrow \infty }f(h,s)=k\).

  4. 4.

    We thank Ludovic Patey for pointing out to us the results implying strictness.

References

  1. Blass, A.: Some questions arising from Hindman’s theorem. Sci. Math. Japonicae 62, 331–334 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Blass, A.R., Hirst, J.L., Simpson, S.G.: Logical analysis of some theorems of combinatorics and topological dynamics. In: Logic and Combinatorics (Arcata, California, 1985), Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 65, pp. 125–156. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carlucci, L.: A weak variant of Hindman’s Theorem stronger than Hilbert’s Theorem. Preprint (2016). https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05445

  4. Carlucci, L.: Weak yet strong restrictions of Hindman’s finite sums theorem. In: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. Preprint (2016). https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.07500. Accepted with minor revision for publication

  5. Carlucci, L.: Bounded Hindman’s theorem and increasing polarized Ramsey’s theorem. In: Nies, A. (ed.) Logic Blog, Part 4, Section 9 (2016). https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.01573

  6. Carlucci, L., Zdanowski, K.: The strength of Ramsey’s theorem for coloring relatively large sets. J. Symbolic Logic 79(1), 89–102 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cholak, P.A., Jockusch, C.G., Slaman, T.A.: On the strength of Ramsey’s theorem for pairs. J. Symbolic Logic 66(1), 1–55 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chong, C.T., Lempp, S., Yang, Y.: On the role of the collection principle for \(\varSigma ^0_2\) formulas in second-order reverse mathematics. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 138, 1093–1100 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Chong, C.T., Slaman, T.A., Yang, Y.: The metamathematics of the stable Ramsey’s theorem for pairs. J. Am. Math. Soc. 27, 863–892 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dzhafarov, D.D.: Cohesive avoidance and strong reductions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 143, 869–876 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dzhafarov, D.D., Hirst, J.L.: The polarized Ramsey’s theorem. Arch. Math. Logic 48(2), 141–157 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dzhafarov, D.D., Jockusch, C.G., Solomon, R., Westrick, L.B.: Effectiveness of Hindman’s theorem for bounded sums. In: Day, A., Fellows, M., Greenberg, N., Khoussainov, B., Melnikov, A., Rosamond, F. (eds.) Computability and Complexity. LNCS, vol. 10010, pp. 134–142. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50062-1_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Hàjek, P., Pudlàk, P.: Metamathematics of First-Order Arithmetic. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hindman, N.: The existence of certain ultrafilters on \(N\) and a conjecture of Graham and Rothschild. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 36(2), 341–346 (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hindman, N.: Finite sums from sequences within cells of a partition of N. J. Comb. Theory Ser. A 17, 1–11 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Hindman, N., Leader, I., Strauss, D.: Open problems in partition regularity. Comb. Probab. Comput. 12, 571–583 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirschfeldt, D.R.: Slicing the Truth (On the Computable and Reverse Mathematics of Combinatorial Principles). Lecture Notes Series, vol. 28, Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hirst, J.: Hilbert vs. Hindman. Arch. Math. Logic 51(1–2), 123–125 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Montalbán, A.: Open questions in Reverse Mathematics. Bull. Symbolic Logic 17(3), 431–454 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Simpson, S.: Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009). Association for Symbolic Logic

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Carlucci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Carlucci, L., Kołodziejczyk, L.A., Lepore, F., Zdanowski, K. (2017). New Bounds on the Strength of Some Restrictions of Hindman’s Theorem. In: Kari, J., Manea, F., Petre, I. (eds) Unveiling Dynamics and Complexity. CiE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10307. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58741-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58741-7_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58740-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58741-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics