Skip to main content

Is there any Real Substance to the Claims for a ‘New Computationalism’?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Unveiling Dynamics and Complexity (CiE 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10307))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Computationalism is a relatively vague term used to describe attempts to apply Turing’s model of computation to phenomena outside its original purview: in modelling the human mind, in physics, mathematics, etc. Early versions of computationalism faced strong objections from many (and varied) quarters, from philosophers to practitioners of the aforementioned disciplines. Here we will not address the fundamental question of whether computational models are appropriate for describing some or all of the wide range of processes that they have been applied to, but will focus instead on whether ‘renovated’ versions of the new computationalism shed any new light on or resolve previous tensions between proponents and skeptics. We find this, however, not to be the case, because the new computationalism falls short by using limited versions of “traditional computation”, or proposing computational models that easily fall within the scope of Turing’s original model, or else proffering versions of hypercomputation with its many pitfalls.

Invited contribution to Computability in Europe (CiE) 2017 – ‘Unveiling Dynamics and Complexity’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aaronson, S.: The Toaster-Enhanced Turing Machine, Blog entry. http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1121. Accessed 11 Feb 2017

  2. Burgin, M.: Super-Recursive Algorithms. Monographs in Computer Science. Springer, New York (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Clinger, W.D.: Foundations of actor semantics. AITR-633 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crevier, D.: AI: The Tumultuous History of the Search for Artificial Intelligence. Basic Books, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davis, M.: The myth of hypercomputation. In: Teuscher, C. (ed.) Alan Turing: Life and Legacy of a Great Thinker, pp. 195–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dodig-Crnkovic, G.: Significance of models of computation, from turing model to natural computation. Minds Mach. 21(2), 301–322 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fresco, N.: Physical Computation and Cognitive Science. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol. 12. Springer, Heildeberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Froese, T.: Life is precious because it is precarious: Individuality, mortality, and the problem of meaning. In: Dodig-Crnkovic, G., Giovagnoli, R. (eds.) Representation and Reality: Humans, Animals and Machines, Springer (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gandy, R.: Church’s thesis and the principles for mechanisms. In: Barwise, H.J., Keisler, H.J., Kunen, K. (eds.) The Kleene Symposium, pp. 123–148. North-Holland Publishing Company (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gurevich, Y.: Sequential abstract state machines capture sequential algorithms. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 1(1), 77–111 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gurevich, Y., Dershowitz, N.: A natural axiomatization of computatbility and proof of the church’s thesis. Bull. Symbolic Logic. 14(3), 299–350 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hernández-Espinosa, A., Hernández-Quiroz, F.: Does the principle of computational equivalence overcome the objections against computationalism? In: Dodig-Crnkovic, G., Giovagnoli, R. (eds.) Computing Nature Turing Centenary Perspective. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, pp. 225–233. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hewitt, C.: What is computation? Actor model versus turing’s model. In: A Computable Universe, Understanding Computation and Exploring Nature as Computation. World Scientific Publishing Company/Imperial College Press, Singapore (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hilbert, D.: Neubegrndung der Mathematik: Erste Mitteilung. Abhandlungen ausdem Seminar der Hamburgischen Universität 1, 157–177 (1922)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kleene, S.C.: Introduction to Metamathematics. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1952)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Langton, C.G.: Studying artificial life with cellular automata. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom. 22(1–3), 120–149 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Lucas, J.R.: Minds, machines and Gödel. Philosophy 36(137), 112–127 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maldonado, C.E., Gómez-Cruz, N.A.: Biological hypercomputation: A concept is introduced (2012). arXiv preprint arXiv:1210.4819

  19. Maldonado, C.E., Gómez-Cruz, N.A.: Biological hypercomputation: A new research problem in complexity theory. Complexity 20(4), 8–18 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Milner, R.: Communicating, Mobile Systems: The Pi Calculus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Milner, R., Parrow, J., Walker, D.: A calculus of mobile processes. Inf. Comput. 100(1), 1–40 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Mycka, J., Costa, J.F.: A new conceptual framework for analog computation. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 374(1–3), 277–290 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Penrose, R., Mermin, D.: The emperor’s new mind: Concerning computers, minds, and the laws of physics. Am. J. Phys. 58(12), 1214–1216 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Putnam, H.: Representation and Reality. A Bradford Book, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Searle, J.R.: Minds, brains, and programs. Behav. Brain Sci. 3(3), 417–424 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Searle, J.R.: Is the brain a digital computer? Proc. Addresses Am. Philos. Assoc. 64(3), 21–37 (1990). American Philosophical Association

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sieg, W.: Church without dogma: Axioms for computability. In: Cooper, S.B., Löwe, B., Sorbi, A. (eds.) New Computational Paradigms, pp. 139–152. Springer, New York (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Sieg, W.: Axioms for computability: Do they allow a proof of church’s thesis? In: Zenil, H. (ed.) A Computable Universe: Understanding and Exploring Nature as Computation. World Scientific Publishing Press, Singapore (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Siegelmann, H.T.: Recurrent neural networks and finite automata. Comput. Intell. 12(4), 567–574 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Turing, A.M.: On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proc. London Math. Soc. 2(42), 230–265 (1936)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Turing, A.M.: On Computable Numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem: A correction. Proc. London Math. Soc. vol. 2 (published 1937). 43(6), 544–546 (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Turing, A.M.: Systems of logic based on ordinals. Proc. London Math. Soc. 2(1), 161–228 (1939)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Wegner, P.: Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms. Commun. ACM 40(5), 80–91 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wegner, P.: Interactive foundations of computing. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 192(2), 315–351 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Wolfram, S.: A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media, Champaign (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Zenil, H., Soler-Toscano, F., Delahaye, J.P., Gauvrit, N.: Two-dimensional kolmogorov complexity and validation of the coding theorem method by compressibility. Peer J. Comput. Sci. 1, 23 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zenil, H., Schmidt, A., Tegnér, J.: Causality, information and biological computation. In: Walker, S.I., Davies, P.C.W., Ellis, G. (eds.) Information and Causality: From Matter to Life. Cambridge University Press (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Héctor Zenil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hernández-Espinosa, A., Hernández-Quiroz, F., Zenil, H. (2017). Is there any Real Substance to the Claims for a ‘New Computationalism’?. In: Kari, J., Manea, F., Petre, I. (eds) Unveiling Dynamics and Complexity. CiE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10307. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58741-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58741-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58740-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58741-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics