Advertisement

Geomorphology Classroom Practices Using Augmented Reality

  • André Luiz Satoshi Kawamoto
  • Maristela Denise Moresco Mezzomo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10278)

Abstract

This article presents a set of classroom practices created for the discipline of Geomorphology that use an Augmented Reality installation known as SARndbox. This set was developed respecting the characteristics and according to a set of usability guidelines for applications that make use of Natural User Interfaces (NUI). The characteristics of Natural Interfaces, as well as the usability guidelines used in the development of these practices are presented.

Keywords

Augmented reality Classroom practices Natural user interfaces Usability guidelines 

References

  1. 1.
    Milgram, P., Kishino, F.: A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 77(12), 1321–1329 (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bower, M., et al.: Augmented Reality in education–cases, places and potentials. Educ. Media Int. 51(1), 1–15 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biswas, K.K., Basu, S.K.: Gesture recognition using Microsoft Kinect. In: 2011 5th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications (ICARA), pp. 100–103. doi: 10.1109/ICARA.2011.6144864
  4. 4.
    Da Gama, A.E.F., Chaves, T., Figueiredo, L., Teichrieb, V.: Poster: improving motor rehabilitation process through a natural interaction based system using kinect sensor. In: 2012 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), pp. 145–146. doi: 10.1109/3DUI.2012.6184203
  5. 5.
    Gerling, K., Livingston, I., Nacke, L., Mandryk, R.: Fullbody motion-based game interaction for older adults. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2012, Austin, Texas, USA, pp. 1873–1882Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martin, C.C., Burkert, D.C., Choi, K.R., Wieczorek, N.B., McGregor, P.M., Herrmann, R.A., Beling, P.A.: A real-time ergonomic monitoring system using the Microsoft Kinect. In: 2012 IEEE Systems and Information Design Symposium (SIEDS), pp. 50–55. doi: 10.1109/SIEDS.2012.6215130
  7. 7.
    Parajuli, M., Tran, D., Ma, W., Sharma, D.: Senior health monitoring using kinect. In: 2012 Fourth International Conference on Communications and Electronics (ICCE), pp. 309–12. doi: 10.1109/CCE.2012.6315918
  8. 8.
    Yeh, S.-C., Hwang, W.-Y., Huang, T.-C., Liu, W.-K., Chen, Y.-T., Hung, Y.-P.: A study for the application of body sensing in assisted rehabilitation training. In: 2012 International Symposium on Computer, Consumer and Control (IS3C), pp. 922–925. doi: 10.1109/IS3C.2012.240
  9. 9.
    Reed, S.E., et al.: Shaping watersheds exhibit: an interactive, augmented reality sandbox for advancing earth science education. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, vol. 1 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zagoranski, S., Divjak, S.: Use of augmented reality in education, vol. 2. IEEE (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vate-U-Lan, P.: An augmented reality 3D Pop-up Book: the development of a multimedia project for English language teaching. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Melbourne, VIC, pp. 890–895. doi: 10.1109/ICME.2012.79
  12. 12.
    Maier, P., Klinker, G.: Augmented chemical reactions: 3D interaction methods for chemistry. Int. J. Online Eng. 9, 80–82 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kato, H., Billinghurst, M.: Marker tracking and HMD calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on augmented reality (IWAR 1999), San Francisco, CA, pp. 85–94 (1999). doi: 10.1109/IWAR.1999.803809
  14. 14.
    Meng, M., et al.: Kinect for interactive AR anatomy learning. In: 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Adelaide, SA, pp. 277–278 (2013). doi: 10.1109/ISMAR.2013.6671803
  15. 15.
    Blake, J.: Natural User Interfaces in. Net Manning Pubs Co Series. Manning Publications Company, Greenwich. ISBN 9781935182818. http://books.google.com.br/books?id=mmMCkgEACAAJ
  16. 16.
    Mezzomo, M.D., Kawamoto, A.: Dispositivo de Baixo Custo para Interfaces Naturais como Ferramenta de Apoio Didático no Ensino de Geomorfologia. In: XI Simpósio Nacional de Geomorfologia (SINAGEO), Maringá (2016). http://www.sinageo.org.br/2016/trabalhos/5/5-198-1664.html
  17. 17.
    Microsoft Corporation: Kinect for windows human interface guidelines v1.8.0 (2013). https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj663791.aspx
  18. 18.
    Brasil: Código Florestal Brasileiro. Lei nº 12.651, de 25 de maio de 2012. Presidência da República do Brasil (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • André Luiz Satoshi Kawamoto
    • 1
  • Maristela Denise Moresco Mezzomo
    • 2
  1. 1.Computing DepartmentFederal University of Technology – ParanáCampo MourãoBrazil
  2. 2.Environmental DepartmentFederal University of Technology – ParanáCampo MourãoBrazil

Personalised recommendations