Abstract
Disaster recovery is regarded as a great opportunity to mitigate future losses from possible hazards. This idea has led the Japanese government to introduce a series of recovery programs, composed of relocation, land readjustment, and the provision of public housing; in fact, many reconstruction projects have already been undertaken under these programs. In spite of the massive reconstruction efforts for ‘building back better’, the recovery of the population has stagnated. Although part of the reason is the trend of population decrease in the area, the existing research and media reports have indicated that the length of time devoted to reconstruction works and the cost to local residents discourages them to the extent that they do not participate in the programs. The purpose of this study is to identify quantitatively whether such a paradoxical impact has existed during the recovery process from the 2011 disaster in Tohoku (Japan) by using panel analysis of 27 affected municipalities from 2009 to 2015. Once the analysis had been completed, a ‘reconstruction paradox’ was found indicating that the larger number of population emigrates from the affected area if the municipality devotes itself to the larger recovery project with heavy reconstruction projects. It was also found that the reconstruction paradox is evident in the municipalities in the high-fatality group, while those in the low-fatality group do not exhibit the significant impact of recovery programs both on in- and out-migration. Based on the results of the study, large-scale reconstruction projects are not recommended to ensure the safety of the residents but instead alternative approaches should be considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The municipalities included in the dataset are Miyako, Ofunato, Kuji, Rikuzentakata, Kamaishi, Otsuchi, Yamada, Iwaizumi, Tanohata, Noda, and Hirono from Iwate Prefecture; Sendai, Ishinomaki, Shiogama, Kesennuma, Natori, Tagajo, Iwanuma, Higashimatsuhima, Watari, Yamamoto, Matsushima, Hichigahama, Onagawa, and Minamisanriku from Miyagi prefecture; Iwaki, Soma, and Shinchi from Fukushima prefecture.
References
Aldrich DP (2012) Building resilience: social capital in post-disaster recovery. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Barenstein JD (2013) Post tsunami relocation outcomes in Sri Lanka communities perspectives in Ampara and Hambantota. In: Barenstein JD (ed) Post-disaster reconstruction and change: communities’ perspectives. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 215–239
Berke PR, Kartez J, Wenger D (1993) Recovery after disaster – achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. Disasters 17(2):93–109. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.1993.tb01137.x
Chamlee-Wright E, Storr VH (2009) Club goods and post-disaster community return. Ration Soc 21(4):429–458
Cho A (2014) Post-tsunami recovery and reconstruction: governance issues and implications of the Great East Japan earthquake. Disasters 38(Suppl 2):S157–S178. doi:10.1111/disa.12068
Fussell E (2015) The long term recovery of New Orleans’ population after Hurricane Katrina. Am Behav Sci 59(10):1231–1245. doi:10.1177/0002764215591181
Fussell E, Sastry N, Vanlandingham M (2010) Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Popul Environ 31(1–3):20–42. doi:10.1007/s11111-009-0092-2
Groen JA, Polivka AE (2010) Going home after Hurricane Katrina: determinants of return migration and changes in affected areas. Demography 47(4):821–844
Iuchi K, Johnson LA, Olshansky RB (2013) Securing Tohoku’s future: planning for rebuilding in the first year following the Tohoku-Oki earthquake and tsunami. Earthquake Spectra 29(S1):S479–S499. doi:10.1193/1.4000119
Iuchi K, Maly E, Johnson L (2015) Three years after a mega-disaster: recovery policies, programs and implementation after the Great East Japan earthquake. 44:29–46. 10.1007/978-3-319-10202-3_3.
Jason David, R. (2010) Opportunities and Challenges for Disaster Mitigation. Community DisasterRecovery and Resiliency, CRC Press: 475–476
Kates RW, Colten CE, Laska S, Leatherman SP (2006) Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: a research perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(40):14653–14660. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605726103
Levine JN, Esnard AM, Sapat A (2007) Population displacement and housing dilemmas due to catastrophic disasters. J Plan Lit 22(1):3–15. doi:10.1177/0885412207302277
Lyons M (2009) Building back better: the large-scale impact of small-scale approaches to reconstruction. World Dev 37(2):385–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.01.006
Matanle P (2013) Post-disaster recovery in ageing and declining communities: the Great East Japan disaster of 11 March 2011. Geography 98:68–76
National Reconstruction Agency (2015) The roadmap of housing recovery
Shaw R (2014a) Community-based recovery and development in Tohoku, Japan. In: Kapucu N, Liou KT (eds) Disaster and development. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 391–309
Shaw R (2014b) Post disaster recovery: issues and challenges. In: Shaw R (ed) Disaster recovery. Springer Japan, Tokyo, pp 1–13
Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication (2013) Dataset on Eastern Japan Pacific coast region and damages. Tohoku’s recovery still hamstrung by manpower crunch five years after tsunami. The Japan Times, March 20, 2016
The Japan Times (2016). Tohoku’s recovery still hamstrung by manpower crunch five years after tsunami. The Japan Times.
The Mainichi (2016) Editorial: give priority to putting disaster victims’ lives back in order. March 9, 2016
The Reconstruction Design Council (2011) Towards Reconstruction“Hope beyond the Disaster”.
Ueda Y, Shaw R (2015) Community recovery in tsunami-affected area: lessons from Minami-Kesennuma. pp 131–146. doi: 10.1007/978-4-431-55136-2_10
United Nations (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction
Vigdor J (2008) The economic aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. J Econ Perspect 22(4):135–154
Acknowledgement
This research is supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (24221010). The initial work of this study owed by undergraduate research of Mr. Shumpei Kawatoko and Ms. Yumiko Matsuba at Kansai University. I am also grateful for comments from Adam Rose, Jonathern Eyer at University of Sourthern California, and Ilan Noy at Victoria University as an reviewer of this paper. All remaining errors, however, are mine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nagamatsu, S. (2018). Building Back a Better Tohoku After the March 2011 Tsunami: Contradicting Evidence. In: Santiago-Fandiño, V., Sato, S., Maki, N., Iuchi, K. (eds) The 2011 Japan Earthquake and Tsunami: Reconstruction and Restoration. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 47. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58691-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58691-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58690-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58691-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)