Skip to main content

“Creating Creativity”: Improving Pre-service Teachers’ Conceptions About Creativity in Chemistry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognitive and Affective Aspects in Science Education Research

Part of the book series: Contributions from Science Education Research ((CFSE,volume 3))

Abstract

Although creativity is considered one of the key competencies in modern society and a central aspect of nature of science, it has been neither established as a main topic in chemistry education research nor in today’s chemistry education practice. In contrast to its real nature, students mostly characterise chemistry as a solely logical and analytical discipline and fail to appreciate the importance of creativity in the development of chemical knowledge. The research project tries to address this deficiency. Based on the assumption that chemistry teachers’ adequate conceptions represent a necessary condition on the way to implement creativity into education practice, the principle aim of our study was to support prospective chemistry teachers in developing these conceptions. Thus, two different approaches were evaluated concerning their impact on teacher students’ conceptions in pre-service chemistry teacher courses at the University of Cologne. While the first approach reflects concrete historical examples of creative modelling processes, the latter offers learning environments, in which teacher students have to become creative themselves. Data were collected by open-ended questionnaires, participant observation and semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that the first approach particularly enables the students to recognise that creativity is important in chemistry, while the latter rather offers the opportunity to realise how creativity works in chemistry. In order to develop comprehensive conceptions, a combined approach seems to be the most suitable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1057–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., et al. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. J., Kühlmann, J. K., & Parchmann, I. (2014). Trendbericht Chemiedidaktik. Der Kompetenzbereich “Erkenntnisgewinnung” [Trend report chemistry didactics. The area of competence “epistemological and methodological knowledge”]. Nachrichten aus der Chemie, 62, 356–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliersbach, M., & Reiners, Ch. S. (2015). Implementierung von Kreativität in den Chemieunterricht?! [Implementation of creativity into chemistry education?!]. In S. Bernholt (Ed.), Heterogenität und Diversität – Vielfalt der Voraussetzungen im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht [Heterogeneity and diversity – Variety of requirements in science education] (pp. 193–195). Kiel: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. (1912). Jacobus Henricus van’t Hoff. Sein Leben und Wirken [Jacobus Henricus van ‘t Hoff. His life and his work]. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, R. J. (2004). Teaching molecular geometry with the VSEPR model. Journal of Chemical Education, 81, 298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haglund, J. (2013). Collaborative and self-generated analogies in science education. Studies in Science Education, 49, 35–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kind, P. M., & Kind, V. (2007). Creativity in science education: Perspectives and challenges for developing school science. Studies in Science Education, 43, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding denatured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education. Rationales and strategies (pp. 83–126). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385. Accessed 25 Apr 2016.

  • Mayring, P. (2002). Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education. Rationales and strategies (pp. 53–72). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, H. F. (1958). Dynamical analogies. Princeton: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Ratcliffe, M., Collins, S., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ‘ideas-about-science’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocke, A. J. (2010). Image and reality. Kekulé, Kopp, and the scientific imagination. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, L. A. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (1990). They’re not dumb, they’re different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson: The Research Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Bliersbach .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bliersbach, M., Reiners, C.S. (2017). “Creating Creativity”: Improving Pre-service Teachers’ Conceptions About Creativity in Chemistry. In: Hahl, K., Juuti, K., Lampiselkä, J., Uitto, A., Lavonen, J. (eds) Cognitive and Affective Aspects in Science Education Research. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58684-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58685-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics