Skip to main content

Chemistry Teachers’ Professional Knowledge, Classroom Action, and Students’ Learning: The Relevance of Technical Language

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Cognitive and Affective Aspects in Science Education Research

Part of the book series: Contributions from Science Education Research ((CFSE,volume 3))

  • 1027 Accesses

Abstract

Teachers’ professional knowledge is investigated in several national and international studies and is seen as a fundamental precondition for improved students’ learning. Though research indicates a connection between teachers’ professional knowledge and their students’ learning achievement, research lacks findings on the connection between teachers’ professional knowledge, their actual classroom action, and students’ learning outcome. The presented study focuses on the relationship between German secondary school chemistry teachers’ professional knowledge on the handling of technical language and their actual handling of technical language in class as well as their students’ learning achievement. Whereas findings confirm a significant general improvement in students’ content knowledge, they also indicate a significant connection between aspects of teachers’ professional knowledge and their students’ learning outcome. Moreover, first qualitative analyses show that teachers in classes with high learning achievement and teachers in classes with low learning achievement differ strongly in their handling of technical language. Teachers’ professional knowledge is related to an improved learning of their students, and especially students with low prior knowledge seem to benefit from teachers’ strong professional knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416. doi:10.1080/09500690802187041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. K., Rogers, M. A. P., Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Gagnon, M. J. (2009). Preparing the next generation of science teacher educators: A model for developing PCK for teaching science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(1), 77–93. doi:10.1007/s10972-008-9115-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, K.-H. (Ed.). (2007). Unterrichtsqualität und Fachdidaktik [quality of instruction and subject didactics]. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barke, H.-D. (2015). Learners ideas, misconceptions, and challange. In J. García-Martínez & E. Serrano-Torregrosa (Eds.), Chemistry education (pp. 395–420). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, K.-O. (2011). Modelle der Unterrichtsqualität [models of quality of instruction]. In K.-O. Bauer & N. Logemann (Eds.), Unterrichtsqualität und Fachdidaktische Forschung. Modelle und Instrumete zur Messung fachspezifischer Lernbedingungen und Kompetenzen [Quality of Instruction and Subject Didactis Research. Models and Instruments for Measuring Subject-Specific Learning Conditions and Competencies] (pp. 51–74). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Loughran, J. (Eds.). (2015). Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bußmann, H. (2002). ikon der Sprachwissenschaft [Dictionary of linguistics] (3rd ed.). Stuttgart: Körner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauet, E., Liepertz, S., Borowski, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2015). Does it matter what we measure? Domain-specific professional knowledge of physics teachers. Revue suisse des sciences de l’éducation, 37(3), 462–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, P. E., Markic, S., & Ryan, M. C. (2015). The role of language in the teaching and learning of chemistry. In J. García-Martínez & E. Serrano-Torregrosa (Eds.), Chemistry education (pp. 395–420). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, M. (2002). Unterrichtsqualität: Eine Frage der Perspektive? Empirische Analysen zur Übereinstimmungs-, Konstrukt- und Kriteriumsvalidität [Quality of instruction: A question of perspective? Empirical analyses regarding congruity-, construct- and criteria validity]. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, O., & van Driel, J. H. (2005). Exploring the development of student teachers’ PCK of the multiple meaning of chemistry topics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollny, S. (2011). Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Testinstruments zur Erfassung des fachspezifischen Professionswissens von Chemielehrkräften [Development and evaluation of a testinstrument for measuring chemistry teachers’ subject specific professional knowledge]. Berlin: Logos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eunson, B. (2012). Communicating in the 21st century (3rd ed.). Milton: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Förtsch, C., Werner, S., Dorfner, T., von Kotzebue, L., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2016). Effects of cognitive activation in biology lessons on students’ situational interest and achievement. Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9517-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grucza, S. (2012). Fachsprachenlinguistik [Linguistics of technical languages]. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H., & Selepeng, D. (2001). A language problem revisited. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 2(1), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2012). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90–106. doi:10.1177/0022487112460398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König, J., Blömeke, S., Paine, L., Schmidt, W. H., & Hsieh, F. J. (2011). General pedagogical knowledge of future middle school teachers: On the complex ecology of teacher education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 188–201. doi:10.1177/0022487110388664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 716–725. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (Eds.). (2013). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers – Results from the COACTIV project. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (2nd ed.). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Özcan, N. (2013). Zum Einfluss der Fachsprache auf die Leistung im Fach Chemie: Eine Förderstudie zur Fachsprache im Chemieunterricht [The influence of technical language on performance in the subject chemistry. A study to foster technical language in chemistry classes]. Berlin: Logos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2007). Revisiting the conceptualisation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., Jang, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-C., & Jung, J. (2010). Is Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching?: Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41(2), 245–260. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9163-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riese, J., & Reinhold, P. (2012). Die professionelle Kompetenz angehender Physiklehrkräfte in verschiedenen Ausbildungsformen. [The professional competency of perspective physics teachers in different forms of qualification]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 15(1), 111–143. doi:10.1007/s11618-012-0259-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roelcke, T. (2005). Fachsprachen [Technical languages] (2nd ed.). Berlin: Schmidt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropohl, M. (2010). Modellierung von Schülerkompetenzen im Basiskonzept chemische reaktion. Entwicklung und analyse von testaufgaben [Modelling of students’ competencies in the basic concept chemical reaction. Development and analysis of test-items]. Berlin: Logos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmölzer-Eibinger. (2013). Sprache als medium des Lernens im Fach [language as medium of learning in subjects]. In M. Becker-Mrotzek (Ed.), Sprache im Fach. Sprachlichkeit und fachliches Lernen [Language as medium of learning in subjects] (pp. 25–41). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Publishing Group, 57(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strübe, M., Tröger, H., Tepner, O., & Sumfleth, E. (2014). Development of a pedagogical content knowledge test of chemistry language and models. Educatión Química, 25(3), 380–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2015). Exploring the language(s) of chemistry education. Chemical Education Research and Practice. doi:10.1039/c5rp90003d.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepner, O., & Dollny, S. (2014). Measuring chemistry teachers’ content knowledge: Is it correlated to pedagogical content knowledge? In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clément (Eds.), Topics and trends in current science education. 9th ESERA conference selected contributions (pp. 243–254). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yore, L. D. (2012). Science literacy for all: More than a slogan, logo, or rally flag! In K. C. D. Tan & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and Challenges in science education research (pp. 5–24). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725. doi:10.1080/09500690305018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Tepner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tröger, H., Sumfleth, E., Tepner, O. (2017). Chemistry Teachers’ Professional Knowledge, Classroom Action, and Students’ Learning: The Relevance of Technical Language. In: Hahl, K., Juuti, K., Lampiselkä, J., Uitto, A., Lavonen, J. (eds) Cognitive and Affective Aspects in Science Education Research. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58684-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58685-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics