Abstract
“Plant blindness” describes the phenomenon that people overlook plants in everyday life, resulting in a constrained view on nature. It also leads to a low interest in plants, as has been shown by several studies on students’ interests. The present study suggests counteracting plant blindness by investigating students’ interest in plants more closely. The goal is to identify groups of plants that are interesting for students and that therefore can be used as potential “flagship species” in botany lessons. A questionnaire was developed to test students’ interest in useful plants, subdivided in five subgroups: medicinal plants, stimulant herbal drugs, spice plants, edible plants and ornamental plants. There were 1299 students aged between 10 and 19 years being investigated in order to explore their interest in useful plants. The data analysis shows (for all ages and both genders) that medicinal plants and stimulant herbal drugs trigger high interest, whereas spice plants, edible plants and ornamental plants raise less interest. Mean values, however, do not allow drawing conclusions on an individual level. In order to gain better insight into the interest patterns of individual students, we used a frequency analysis. Results show that stimulant herbal drugs polarise strongly, whereas medicinal plants are interesting for almost all students. Ornamental plants are interesting for especially a group of younger students. Based on the identified interest profiles, recommendations can be made which study objects from different subgroups of useful plants should be chosen as study objects in botany lessons in order to best address students’ interest.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We take into account only those subgroups of useful plants, which best enable differentiating between different interest types because they show a clear deviation from an equal distribution in the whole sample (Pany and Heidinger 2015).
References
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2005). Characterizing children’s spontaneous interests in science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 803–826.
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2007). Interest in biology: A developmental shift characterized using self-generated questions. The American Biology Teacher, 69(9), 532–540.
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2009). Identifying meta-clusters of students’ interest in science and their change with age. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(9), 999–1022.
Baram-Tsabari, A., Sethi, R. J., Bry, L., & Yarden, A. (2010). Identifying students’ interests in biology using a decade of self-generated questions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 63–75.
Blankenburg, J. S., Höffler, T. N., & Parchmann, I. (2015). Fostering today what is needed tomorrow: Investigating students’ interest in science. Science Education, 100(2), 364–391.
Campbell, N. A., & Reece, J. B. (2011). Biology. San Francisco: Pearson.
Cholewa, G., Driza, M., Einhorn, S., & Felling, J. (2010). Vom Leben [About life] (Vol. 1). Wien: Ed. Hölzel.
Dawson, C. (2000). Upper primary boys’ and girls’ interests in science: Have they changed since 1980? International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 557–570.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). Die Selbstbestimmungstheorie der Motivation und ihre Bedeutung für die Pädagogik [The self-determination-theory of motivation and its relevance for pedagogy]. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogik, 39(2), 223–238.
Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107.
Drissner, J., Haase, H.-M., & Hille, K. (2010). Short-term environmental education – Does it work? – An evaluation of the ‘Green Classroom’. Journal of Biological Education, 44(4), 149–155.
Elster, D. (2007). Student interests – The German and Austrian ROSE survey. Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), 5–10.
Fančovičová, J., & Prokop, P. (2010). Development and initial psychometric assessment of the plant attitude questionnaire. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(5), 415–421.
Flannery, M. C. (1991). Considering plants. The American Biology Teacher, 53(5), 306–309.
Flannery, M. C. (2002). Do plants have to be intelligent? The American Biology Teacher, 64(8), 628–633.
Frisch, J. K., Unwin, M. M., & Saunders, G. W. (2010). Name that plant! Overcoming plant blindness and developing a sense of place using science and environmental education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Greenfield, S. S. (1955). The challenge to botanists. Challenge, 1(1). Retrieved from https://secure.botany.org/plantsciencebulletin/psb-1955-01-1.php
Hammann, M. (2011). Wie groß ist das Interesse von Schülern an Heilpflanzen? [How interested are students in medicinal plants?]. Zeitschrift Für Phytotherapie, 32(01), 15–19.
Häussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (1998). Chancengleichheit für Mädchen im Physikunterricht. Ergebnisse eines erweiterten BLK-Modellversuchs. [Equal opportunities for girls in physics education. Results from the extended BLK-pilot project]. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 4(1), 51–67.
Hershey, D. R. (1992). Making plant biology curricula relevant. Bioscience, 42(3), 188–191.
Hershey, D. R. (2002). Plant blindness: ‘We have met the enemy and he is us’. Plant Science Bulletin, 48(3), 78–84.
Hershey, D. R. (2005). Plant content in the national science education standards. Retrieved from http://www.Actionbioscience.Org/education/hershey2.Html. 20 Dec 2016.
Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549–571.
Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness-A neglected variable in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10(2), 179–194.
Kattmann, U. (2000). Lernmotivation und Interesse im Biologieunterricht [Motivation and interest in biology education]. Lehren Und Lernen Im Biologieunterricht, 13–31.
Kinchin, I. M. (1999). Educational research-investigating secondary-school girls’ preferences for animals or plants: A simple’ head-to-head’ comparison using two unfamiliar organisms-A direct comparison of two. Journal of Biological Education, 33(2), 95–99.
Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(1), 23–40.
Krüger, D., & Burmester, A. (2005). Wie Schüler Pflanzen ordnen [How do students classify plants?]. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 11, 85–102.
Lieberei, R., Reisdorff, C., & Franke, W. (2007). Nutzpflanzenkunde: Nutzbare Gewächse der gemässigten breiten, Subtropen und Tropen [Useful plants: Useful plants of temperate regions, subtropics and tropics]. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag.
Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2005). ‘Loveable’ mammals and ‘lifeless’ plants: How children’s interest in common local organisms can be enhanced through observation of nature. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 655–677.
Löwe, B. (1987). Interessenverfall im Biologieunterricht [Decrease of interest in biology education]. Unterricht Biologie, 124, 62–65.
Löwe, B. (1992). Biologieunterricht und Schülerinteressen an Biologie [Students’ interest in biology]. Weinheim: Dt. Studien-Verl.
Mayer, J., & Horn, F. (1993). Formenkenntnis–wozu [Knowledge about plants forms and taxonomy – What for?]. Unterricht Biologie, 189(17), 4–13.
Pany, P. (2010). Ausgedörrt und abgetreten. Über das widrige (?) Leben von Pflanzen in Pflasterritzen [Dried and trampled down. About the hard life of plants in paving cracks]. Umwelt & Bildung, 1, 19–21.
Pany, P. (2014). Students’ interest in useful plants: A potential key to counteract plant blindness. Plant Science Bulletin, 60(1), 18–27.
Pany, P., & Heidinger, C. (2015). Uncovering patterns of interest in useful plants – Frequency analysis of individual students’ interest types as a tool for planning botany teaching units. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 1(1), 15–39.
Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Analysis of the decline in interest towards school science and technology from grades 5 through 11. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 784–802.
Randler, C. (2008). Teaching species identification—A prerequisite for learning biodiversity and understanding ecology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 223–231.
Rogl, H., & Bergmann, L. (2003). Biologie aktiv [Active biology] (Vol. 1). Graz: Leykam.
Sanders, D., Nyberg, E., Eriksen, B., & Snæbjørnsdóttir, B. (2015). ‘Plant blindness’: Time to find a cure. The Biologist, 62(3), 9.
Schirl, K., & Möslinger, E. (2011). Expedition Biologie [Biological expedition] (Vol. 1). Wien: Dorner.
Schreiner, C. (2006). Exploring a ROSE-Garden. Oslo: Department of Teacher Education and School Development Faculty of Education, University of Oslo.
Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE. Background, rationale, questionnaire development and data collection for ROSE (The relevance of science education)–A comparative study of students’ views of science and science education (pdf), Acta Didactica 4/2004. Oslo: Department of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo.
Sjøberg, S. (2000). Science and scientists: The SAS study. Acta Didactica, 1, 1–73.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project: An overview and key findings. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Reiss, M. J. (2000). Building a model of the environment: How do children see plants? Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 172–177.
Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Ueckert, C. (2007). Teaching biology—The great dilemma. Journal of Biological Education, 41(2), 51–52.
Urhahne, D., Jeschke, J., Krombaß, A., & Harms, U. (2004). Die Validierung von Fragebogenerhebungen zum Interesse an Tieren und Pflanzen durch computergestützte Messdaten [Using computer-based data to validate a questionnaire measuring interest in animals and plants]. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 18(3), 213–219.
Valsiner, J. (1986). Between groups and individuals. The Individual Subject and Scientific Psychology, 113–151.
Vaughan, C., Gack, J., Solorazano, H., & Ray, R. (2003). The effect of environmental education on schoolchildren, their parents, and community members: A study of intergenerational and intercommunity learning. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(3), 12–21.
Wandersee, J. H. (1986). Plants or animals – Which do junior high school students prefer to study? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(5), 415–426.
Wandersee, J. H., & Schussler, E. (2001). Toward a theory of plant blindness. Plant Science Bulletin, 47(1), 2–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pany, P., Heidinger, C. (2017). Useful Plants as Potential Flagship Species to Counteract Plant Blindness. In: Hahl, K., Juuti, K., Lampiselkä, J., Uitto, A., Lavonen, J. (eds) Cognitive and Affective Aspects in Science Education Research. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58684-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58685-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)