Advertisement

Modeling a Systematic-Innovation Approach for Green Product Design

  • Yao-Tsung KoEmail author
  • Meng-Cong Zheng
  • Chi-Hung Lo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10290)

Abstract

Technology developing always impacts environment. Designers must consider the balance between technical innovation and environmental protection when creating an innovative product. This paper presents a systematic-innovation design method for green product based on the QFD approach and TRIZ tools. Conceptual design is considered to be one of the pivotal components in New Product Development (NPD) process which has a significant impact on downstream NPD activities. Despite the recognized importance of conceptual design, there is a lack of a systematic and effective innovation creating process for green product. To address this gap, a useful and powerful design method of systematic innovation is created for green product, depending on the capability of QFD detailed problem analysis and the prowess of TRIZ innovative idea generation. The proposed design method was developed with QFD-I and an eco-contradiction matrix identifying the contradiction between customer needs and eco-efficiency elements for deriving TRIZ invention principles. The related specific solutions are conducted from these invention principles. The eco-innovative product could be created depended on these specific solutions. A case study of the innovative garden eco-light design was demonstrated for the applicability of this method and the results validated the feasibility and effectiveness.

Keywords

Systematic-innovation Green product QFD TRIZ Eco-contradiction matrix 

References

  1. Akao, Y.: Quality Function Deployment. Productivity Press (1990)Google Scholar
  2. Akao, Y.: QFD: past, present, and future. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on QFD 1997, Linko ping (1997)Google Scholar
  3. Altshuller, G.S.: Creativity as an Exact Science: the Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems. Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam (1984)Google Scholar
  4. Altshuller, G.S.: And Suddenly the Invento, 2nd edn. MA Technical Innovation Center, Worcester (1996)Google Scholar
  5. Behrendt, S., Jasch, C., Peneda, M.C., Van Weenen, H.: Life Cycle Design, a Manual for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. Springer, Berlin (1997)Google Scholar
  6. Chan, L.K., Wu, M.L.: Quality function deployment: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 143, 463–497 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Cascini, G., Rissone, P., Rotini, F., Russo, D.: Systematic design through the integration of TRIZ and optimization tools. Procedia Eng. 9, 674–679 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, J.L., Yen, M.: Development product design methodology by using life cycle assessment for design for environment tasks. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Cleaner Production and Sustainable Development 1999, 13–17 December, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 361–370 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. Chen, J.L.: Green evolution rules and ideality laws for green innovative design of products. In Fourth International Symposium on Going Green-Care Innovation (2002)Google Scholar
  10. Chen, J.L., Liu, C.C.: An eco-innovative design approach incorporating the TRIZ method without contradiction analysis. J. Sustain. Prod. Des. 1(4), 262–272 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. Crowe, T.J., Cheng, C.C.: Using quality function deployment in manufacturing strategic planning. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 16(4), 35–48 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Desimone, L.D., Popoff, F.: Eco-efficiency: the business link to sustainable development. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  13. Fiksel, J.: Design for Environment. McGraw-Hill, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  14. Fresner, J., Jantschgi, J., Birkel, S., Barnthaler, J., Krenn, C.: The theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ) as option generation tool within cleaner production projects. J. Cleaner Prod. 18(2), 128–136 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grote, C.A., Jones, R.M., Blount, G.N., Goodyer, J., Shayler, M.: An approach to the EuP directive and the application of the economic eco-design for complex products. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45, 4099–4117 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Han, C.H., Kim, J.K., Choi, S.H., Kim, S.H.: Determination of information system development priority using quality function deployment. Comput. Ind. Eng. 35(1–2), 241–244 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hsu, M.Y.: Promoting innovation for environment by green patent system. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Cleaner Production and Sustainable Development 1999, 13–17 December, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 485–494 (1999)Google Scholar
  18. Jones, E., Harrison, D., Stanton, N.A.: The application of TRIZ tools in an eco-innovation process. In: Proceedings of World Conference on TRIZ Future 2001, 7–9 November, Bath, UK, pp. 57–78 (2001)Google Scholar
  19. Justel, D., Vidal, R., Chiner, M.: TRIZ applied to innovate in design for disassembly. In: 1st IFIP TC-5 Working Conference on CAI, IFIP-TC5 ULM, Germany (2005)Google Scholar
  20. Jugulum, R., Sefik, M.: Building a robust manufacturing strategy. Comput. Ind. Eng. 35(1–2), 225–228 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karsak, E.E., Sozer, S., Alptekin, S.E.: Product planning in quality function deployment using combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 44, 171–190 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Low, M.K., Lamvik, T., Walsh, K., Myklebust, O.: Product to service ecoinnovation: the TRIZ model of creativity explored. In: International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, pp. 209–214. IEEE, San Francisco (2000)Google Scholar
  23. Masui, K., Sako, T., Aizawa, S., Inaba, A.: Design for environment in early stage of product development using quality function deployment. In: Reichl, H., Griese, H.-J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Joint International Congress and Exhibition—Electronics Goes Green, vol. 1. VDE Verlag, Berlin (2000)Google Scholar
  24. Sakao, T.: A QFD-centred design methodology for environmentally conscious product design. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45(18–19), 4143–4162 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Sanchez, M., Ramberg, J.S., Fiero, J., Pignatiello, J.J.: Quality by design. In: Kusiak, A. (ed.) Concurrent Engineering : Automation, Tools, and Techniques. Wiley, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  26. Stratton, B.: The refined focus of automotive quality. Qual. Prog. 22(10), 47–50 (1989)Google Scholar
  27. Tsai, C.Y., Lo, C.C., Chang, A.C.: Using fuzzy QFD to enhance manufacturing strategic planning. J. Chin. Inst. Ind. Eng. 18(3), 33–41 (2003)Google Scholar
  28. Wenzel, H., Hauschild, M., Alting, L.: Environmental Assessment of Products. Chapman & Hall, London (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial DesignTunghai UniversityTaichungTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Industrial DesignNational Taipei University of TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations