Advertisement

Taiwanese People’s Wayfinding Personas and Tool Preferences

  • Chih-Wei Joy Lo
  • Chia-Ning LiaoEmail author
  • I-Ping Chen
  • Tsuei-Ju Hsieh
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10290)

Abstract

Improving wayfinding system design is a challenge facing hospitals today, and as such this study seeks to improve the design of wayfinding systems by understanding patient routing patterns, wayfinding strategies, and wayfinder tool preference. The methodology of this study has three stages: The first is to administer the Wayfinding Strategies and Related Capabilities Survey [1] to a Taiwanese sample, and then to conduct a factor analysis to isolate important factors. Test subjects included 178 Taiwanese from different professional and education backgrounds. The second stage is based on the ratings of five wayfinding tools used by subjects (Google Maps, map signage, Hand-drawn maps, bystander assistance, and directional signage). A correlation analysis of the helpfulness of the tools and the factors isolated in stage 1 is conducted to separate the subjects into different wayfinding personas. The third stage is conducting interviews of exemplars of the personas found in the second stage. A factor analysis is conducted on the results of the survey, and important survey items are identified. Subjects are divided into one of the following 8 wayfinding personas based on their Wayfinding Ability and Wayfinding Strategy (survey or map strategy): Improvisational, Helpless, Capable, Brute Force, Orienteer, Road-Blind, Map Consultant, and Map-Blind. We advise that prospective designers of smart devices should, in addition to the current functions of Google Maps, consider the habit of hospital users to seek help, as well as the needs of the visually impaired.

Keywords

Wayfinding design Wayfinding persona Wayfinding strategy Wayfinding tools Wayfinding ability 

References

  1. 1.
    Ma, S., Chang, S.: Exploring the way-finding ability of college students and its affecting factors (Master’s thesis) (2009). https://ir.nctu.edu.tw/handle/11536/42817. (in Chinese)
  2. 2.
    Lo, C.W.: Smart wayfinding for the future hospital. In: Yin, H.W. (eds.) SMART Hospital Design, pp. 334–345. Yonglin Foundation X-Lab, Taipei (2015). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lo, C.W., Yien, H.W., Chen, I.P.: How universal are the universal symbols? An estimation of cross-cultural adoption of universal health care symbol. HERD J. 9(3), 116–134 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raven, A., Laberge, J., Ganton, J., Johnson, M.: Wayfinding in a hospital: electronic kiosks point the way. Exp. Mag. 14(3) (2014). http://uxpamagazine.org/wayfinding-in-a-hospital/?lang=zh
  5. 5.
    Huang, J., Tzeng, S.: A study of wayfinding behavior in out-patient area-two single floor type for example. J. Des. 13(4), 43–62 (2008). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hart, R.A., Moore, G.T.: The Development of Spatial Cognition: A Review, pp. 246–288. Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick (1973)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siegel, A.W., White, S.H.: The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 10, 9–55 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Canter, D.V.: Way-finding and signposting: penance or prosthesis? In: Canter, D.V. (ed.) Psychology in Action, pp. 139–158. Dartmouth Publishing Company, Hantshire (1996). http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/9227/
  9. 9.
    Devlin, A.S., Bernstein, J.: Interactive way-finding: map style and effectiveness. J. Env. Psychol. 17(2), 99–110 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weisman, J.: Evaluating architectural legibility way-finding in the built environment. Env. Behav. 13(2), 189–204 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murakoshi, S., Kawai, M.: Use of knowledge and heuristics for wayfinding in an artificial environment. Env. Behav. 32(6), 756–774 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Magliano, J.P., Cohen, R., Allen, G.L., Rodrigue, J.R.: The impact of a wayfinder’s goal on learning a new environment: different types of spatial knowledge as goals. J. Env. Psychol. 15(1), 65–75 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hunt, M.E.: Environmental learning without being there. Env. Behav. 16(3), 307–334 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lawton, C.A.: Gender differences in way-finding strategies: relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles 30(11–12), 765–779 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kato, Y., Takeuchi, Y.: Individual differences in wayfinding strategies. J. Env. Psychol. 23(2), 171–188 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen, G.: Wayfinding and Signage in Libraries. Flysheet Information Services Co., Ltd., Taipei (2007). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gärling, T., Böök, A., Lindberg, E.: Spatial orientation and wayfinding in the designed environment: a conceptual analysis and some suggestions for post occupancy evaluation. J. Archit. Plan. Res. 3(1), 55–64 (1986)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kitchin, R.M.: Cognitive maps: what are they and why study them? J. Env. Psychol. 14(1), 1–19 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thorndyke, P.W., Stasz, C.: Individual differences in procedures for knowledge acquisition from maps. Cogn. Psychol. 12(1), 137–175 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chih-Wei Joy Lo
    • 1
  • Chia-Ning Liao
    • 2
    Email author
  • I-Ping Chen
    • 3
  • Tsuei-Ju Hsieh
    • 4
  1. 1.Mass Communication DepartmentHsuan-Chuang UniversityHsinchuTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Educational Psychology and CounselingNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Institute of Applied ArtsNational Chiao-Tung UniversityHsinchuTaiwan
  4. 4.Department of Information CommunicationChinese Culture UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations