Advertisement

Beyond Hedonic Enjoyment: Conceptualizing Eudaimonic Motivation for Personal Informatics Technology Usage

  • Ayoung SuhEmail author
  • Christy M. K. Cheung
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10289)

Abstract

Personal informatics technologies (PITs) have become popular tools that enable people to monitor and track themselves. By providing self-knowledge, PITs increase self-control, foster insight, and promote positive behavioral changes. The pursuit of knowledge about self, excellence, and self-growth is eudaimonic because it makes a person more capable and well informed. Considering the unique technological characteristics, research suggests that eudaimonic motivation should be considered in explaining PIT usage. However, despite increasing scholarly attention being paid to the eudaimonic nature of PITs, a systematic approach to developing a research construct that reflects a PIT user’s eudaimonic motivation is lacking in computer-human interaction research. To fill this gap, drawing on the theory of aesthetic experience, we propose a multi-dimensional construct of aesthetic experience to conceptualize eudaimonic motivation for PIT usage. Based on its conceptual definition, we develop the measures to capture the extent of a PIT user’s aesthetic experience and empirically examine the construct validity. Compared with widely examined antecedents of technology usage—perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived enjoyment—this study shows that a PIT user’s aesthetic experience is a key determinant for intention to use. Notably, perceived enjoyment loses its predictive value in favor of aesthetic experience. Our findings suggest that the eudaimonic nature of a PIT should be considered in understanding technology usage.

Keywords

Personal informatics technology Eudaimonic motivation Intrinsic motivation Hedonic enjoyment Aesthetic experience 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported in part by grants No. 6000546 from City University of Hong Kong awarded to the first author.

References

  1. 1.
    Agarwal, R., Karahanna, E.: Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Q. 24(4), 665–694 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amabile, T.M.: Within you, without you: the social psychology of creativity, and beyond. Creat. Res. J. 3(1), 92–98 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Annas, J.: Happiness as achievement. Daedalus 133(2), 44–51 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beardsley, M.C.: Aesthetic theory and educational theory. In: Smith, R. (ed.) Aesthetic Concepts and Education, pp. 3–20. University of Illinois Press, Chicago (1970)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beardsley, M.C.: The Aesthetic Point of View: Selected Essays. Cornell University Press, London (1982)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berlyne, D.: Aesthetics and Psychobiology Appleton-Century-Crofts. Appleton-Centry-Crofts, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chamberlain, A., Poole, E., Munson, S., Danis, C., Churchill, E.: Moving beyond e-Health and the quantified self: the role of CSCW in collaboration, community and practice for technologically-supported proactive health and wellbeing. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp. 273–276. ACM, February 2015Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheung, C.M., Chiu, P.-Y., Lee, M.K.: Online social networks: why do students use facebook? Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(4), 1337–1343 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Churchill Jr., G.A.: A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. Market. Res. 16, 64–73 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deterding, S.: Eudaimonic design, or: six invitations to rethink gamification. In: Fuchs, M., Fizek, S., Ruffino, P. (eds.) Niklas Schrape. Lüneburg: Meson press 2014 (2014). Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2466374
  11. 11.
    Dewey, J.: Art as Experience. The Berkeley Publishing Goup, New York (1934)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    DiClemente, C.C., Marinilli, A.S., Singh, M., Bellino, L.E.: The role of feedback in the process of health behavior change. Am. J. Health Behav. 25(3), 217–227 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Epstein, D.A., Borning, A., Fogarty, J.: Fine-grained sharing of sensed physical activity: a value sensitive approach. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fenner, D.E.: Aesthetic experience and aesthetic analysis. J. Aesthet. Educ. 37(1), 40–53 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity 5, 89–120 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fornell, C., Bookstein, F.L.: Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Market. Res. 19(4), 440–452 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fritz, T., Huang, E.M., Murphy, G.C., Zimmermann, T.: Persuasive technology in the real world: a study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gottschalg, O., Zollo, M.: Interest alignment and competitive advantage. Acad. Manage. Rev. 32(2), 418–437 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate Data Analysis, vol. 6. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hsu, C.-L., Lin, J.C.-C.: Acceptance of blog usage: the roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Inf. Manage. 45(1), 65–74 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jennings, M.: Theory and models for creating engaging and immersive ecommerce websites. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ke, W., Tan, C.-H., Sia, C.-L., Wei, K.-K.: Inducing intrinsic motivation to explore the enterprise system: the supremacy of organizational levers. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 29(3), 257–290 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee, M.K., Cheung, C.M., Chen, Z.: Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Inf. Manage. 42(8), 1095–1104 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li, I., Dey, A., Forlizzi, J.: A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 557–566. ACM, April 2010Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li, I., Dey, A.K., Forlizzi, J.: Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li, I., Dey, A., Forlizzi, J., Höök, K., Medynskiy, Y.: Personal informatics and HCI: design, theory, and social implications. In: CHI 2011 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2417–2420. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lindenberg, S., Foss, N.J.: Managing joint production motivation: the role of goal framing and governance mechanisms. Acad. Manage. Rev. 36(3), 500–525 (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lowry, P.B., Gaskin, J., Twyman, N., Hammer, B., Roberts, T.: Taking ‘fun and games’ seriously: Proposing the hedonic-motivation system adoption model (HMSAM). J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14(11), 617–671 (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    McCarthy, J., Wright, P.: Technology as Experience. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    McGrath, N., Bayerlein, L.: Engaging online students through the gamification of learning materials: the present and the future (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Meyer, J., Simske, S., Siek, K.A., Gurrin, C.G., Hermens, H.: Beyond quantified self: data for wellbeing. In: Paper Presented at the CHI 2014 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2014)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(3), 192–222 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nardi, B.: My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2010)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nunnally, J.C., Bernstein, I.H., Berge, J.M.T.: Psychometric Theory, vol. 226. JSTOR, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Patel, M.S., Asch, D.A., Volpp, K.G.: Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA 313(5), 459–460 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ploderer, B., Reitberger, W., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., van Gemert-Pijnen, J.: Social interaction and reflection for behaviour change. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 18(7), 1667–1676 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rapp, A., Cena, F.: Self-monitoring and technology: challenges and open issues in personal informatics. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8516, pp. 613–622. Springer, Cham (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07509-9_58 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A., Chalmers, M.C.: Personal tracking as lived informatics. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Canada (2014)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25(1), 54–67 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ryff, C.D., Keyes, C.L.M.: The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 69(4), 719 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shin, G., Cheon, E.J., Jarrahi, M.H.: Understanding quantified-selfers’ interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the use of activity-tracking devices. In: Paper Presented at the iConference 2015 Proceedings (2015)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Suh, A.: Applying game design elements in the workplace. In: Paper Presented at the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) 2015, Fort Worth, USA (2015a)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Suh, A.: Measuring user engagement in an enterprise gamified system. In: Proceedings of CHI Gamification Workshop 2015, Seoul, Korea (2015b)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Teo, T.S., Lim, V.K., Lai, R.Y.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. Omega 27(1), 25–37 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Todd, P., Benbasat, I.: An experimental investigation of the impact of computer based decision aids on decision making strategies. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(2), 87–115 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Van der Heijden, H.: User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Q. 28(4), 695–704 (2004)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Waterman, A.S.: Two conceptions of happiness: contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 64(4), 678 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Waterman, A.S., Schwartz, S.J., Zamboanga, B.L., Ravert, R.D., Williams, M.K., Bede Agocha, V., Brent Donnellan, M.: The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. J. Posit. Psychol. 5(1), 41–61 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wendel, S.: Designing for behavior change: applying psychology and behavioral economics. O’Reilly Media Inc, Sebastopol (2013)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wendy Zhu, W., Morosan, C.: An empirical examination of guests’ adoption of interactive mobile technologies in hotels: revisiting cognitive absorption, playfulness, and security. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 5(1), 78–94 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Creative Media and Department of Information SystemsCity University of Hong KongKowloon TongHong Kong, SAR
  2. 2.Department of Finance and Decision Sciences, School of BusinessHong Kong Baptist UniversityKowloon TongHong Kong, SAR

Personalised recommendations