Advertisement

Electric Vehicle Explorer

Educating and Persuading Consumers with an Online Vehicle Energy Cost Calculator
  • Angela SanguinettiEmail author
  • Kiernan Salmon
  • Mike Nicholas
  • Gil Tal
  • Matt Favetti
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10289)

Abstract

Most HCI research related to electric vehicle adoption has focused on mitigating barriers related to vehicle range and charging infrastructure, while relatively less attention has been given to helping consumers recognize the benefits of electric vehicles. A significant benefit is reduced energy costs; however, the complexity of comparing gasoline and electricity prices makes it difficult for consumers to quantify. This paper describes and evaluates an online tool called EV Explorer that enables users to compare personalized estimates of annual energy costs for multiple vehicles. We assessed the tool through an online experiment, gauging users’ perceptions—before and after using the tool—of their current energy costs, potential savings with electric vehicles, attitude toward electric vehicle charging, and intention to buy or lease an electric vehicle in the future. Statistically significant changes in each of these variables validate the tool as an educational and persuasive strategy to promote electric vehicle adoption.

Keywords

Eco-feedback Electric vehicles Vehicle cost calculator 

References

  1. 1.
    Egbue, O., Long, S.: Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: an analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy 48, 717–729 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khan, M., Kockelman, K.M.: Predicting the market potential of plug-in electric vehicles using multiday GPS data. Energy Policy 46, 225–233 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tamor, M.A., Milačić, M.: Electric vehicles in multi-vehicle households. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 56, 52–60 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.02.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jakobsson, N., Gnann, T., Plötz, P., Sprei, F., Karlsson, S.: Are multi-car households better suited for battery electric vehicles? - driving patterns and economics in Sweden and Germany. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 65, 1–15 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lundström, A., Bogdan, C., Kis, F., Olsson, I., Fahlén, L.: Enough power to move: dimensions for representing energy availability. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp 201–210. ACM Digital Library (2012). doi: 10.1145/2371574.2371605
  6. 6.
    Lundström, A, Bogdan, C.: COPE1-taking control over EV range. In: Adjunct Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 17–18 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lundström, A., Hellström, F.: Getting to know electric cars through an app. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 289–296 (2015). doi: 10.1145/2799250.2799272
  8. 8.
    Lundström, A.: Differentiated driving range: exploring a solution to the problems with the “guess-o-meter” in electric cars. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. pp. 1–8 (2014). doi: 10.1145/2667317.2667347
  9. 9.
    Schewel, L.: Lessons from the virtual Ev test drive. In: Behavior Energy and Climate Change. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 30 November–2 December 2011Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Starr, C.: Social benefit versus technological risk. Science 165, 1232–1238 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alhakami, A.S., Slovic, P.: A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Anal. 14(6), 1085–1096 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kurani, K.: New car buyers’ valuation of zero-emission vehicles: California. Contractor: UC Davis. Contract Number: 12–332Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nicholas, M.A., Gil, T.: Charging for charging at work: increasing the availability of charging through pricing. In: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, Working Paper UCD-ITS-WP-13-02 (2013)Google Scholar

Data Sources for EV Explorer

  1. 14.
    Node.js Foundation. (n.d.). Node.js. http://nodejs.org. Accessed 24 Sept 2015
  2. 15.
    Google. (n.d.). Google Maps Java Script API. https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/javascript/. Accessed 24 Sept 2015
  3. 16.
    Energy Information Administration. (n.d.). Open Data. http://www.eia.gov/beta/api/. Accessed 24 Sept 2015
  4. 17.
    Freegoip. (n.d.). freegoip.net. https://freegeoip.net/. Accessed 24 Sept 2015

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela Sanguinetti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kiernan Salmon
    • 1
  • Mike Nicholas
    • 1
  • Gil Tal
    • 1
  • Matt Favetti
    • 1
  1. 1.Consumer Energy Interfaces LabUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations