Advertisement

EcoTrips

Leveraging Co-benefits and Metaphorical Metrics in a Mobile App to Promote Walking and Biking for Short Trips
  • Hannah ParkEmail author
  • Angela Sanguinetti
  • Gabriel Castillo Cortes
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10289)

Abstract

There is an overreliance on personal vehicle travel for short trips in the United States. This paper describes a mobile application, called EcoTrips, that promotes walking and biking for short trips by tracking users’ travel behavior and providing a variety of feedback. EcoTrips conveys environmental impacts of travel behavior, and also leverages a variety of co-benefits of green travel by providing feedback related to fitness, finances, and time management. Feedback is conveyed in conventional as well as metaphorical metrics to make the data more comprehensible and meaningful. EcoTrips is unique among similar apps in that it provides a very high degree of flexibility for users to tailor the metrics that are displayed. It is also unique in that it is both the subject of HCI research and publicly available in English and in the United States. In a small pilot field study, participants reported some increase in awareness of the impacts of their travel behavior, and some small changes in their travel mode choices. Participants also highlighted the importance of maximizing the personalization of data. Given the expanding landscape and prevalence of pervasive and personal mobile and wearable technologies, HCI researchers should continue to develop eco-feedback and trip planning technologies to promote green travel modes for short trips.

Keywords

Eco-feedback Green transportation Travel modes Mobile app 

References

  1. 1.
    Ainsworth, B.E., Haskell, W.L., Whitt, M.C., Irwin, M.L., Swartz, A.M., Strath, S.J., Jacobs, D.R.: Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 32(9; SUPP/1), S498–S504 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials: Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing. AASHTO (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Althoff, T., White, R.W., Horvitz, E.: Influence of Pokémon Go on Physical Activity: Study and Implications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02085 (2016)
  4. 4.
    Alfonzo, M.A.: To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environ. Behav. 37(6), 808–836 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bolderdijk, J.W., Steg, L., Geller, E.S., Lehman, P.K., Postmes, T.: Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nat. Clim. Change 3(4), 413–416 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Consolvo, S., Klasnja, P., McDonald, D.W., Landay, J.A.: Goal-setting considerations for persuasive technologies that encourage physical activity. In: Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Persuasive Technology, p. 8. ACM, April 2009Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dukes, J.S.: Burning buried sunshine: human consumption of ancient solar energy. Clim. Change 61(1–2), 31–44 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dillahunt, T., Becker, G., Mankoff, J., Kraut, R.: Motivating environmentally sustainable behavior changes with a virtual polar bear. In: Pervasive 2008 Workshop Proceedings, vol. 8, pp. 58–62, May 2008Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dietz, T.: Altruism, self-interest, and energy consumption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112(6), 1654–1655 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eom, K., Kim, H.S., Sherman, D.K., Ishii, K.: Cultural variability in the link between environmental concern and support for environmental action. Psychol. Sci. 27(10), 1331–1339 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    EIA: Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 27 Feb 2017. http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/
  12. 12.
    EPA: Light-Duty Automotive Technology, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 Through 2016. US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-420-R-16–010 (2016). Accessed Nov 2016Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Froehlich, J., Dillahunt, T., Klasnja, P., Mankoff, J., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., Landay, J.A.: UbiGreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1043–1052. ACM, April 2009Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., Landay, J.: The design of eco-feedback technology. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1999–2008. ACM, April 2010Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., Ostergren, M., Ramanathan, S., Peterson, J., Wragg, I., Larson, E., Fu, F., Bai, M., Patel, S., Landay, J.A.: The design and evaluation of prototype eco-feedback displays for fixture-level water usage data. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2367–2376. ACM, May 2012Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gatersleben, B., Appleton, K.M.: Contemplating cycling to work: Attitudes and perceptions in different stages of change. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 41(4), 302–312 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gotschi, T., Mills, K.: Active Transportation for America: The Case for Increased Federal Investment in Bicycling and Walking. Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, Washington, DC (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holmes, T.G.: Eco-visualization: combining art and technology to reduce energy consumption. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, pp. 153–162. ACM, June 2007Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jariyasunant, J., Abou-Zeid, M., Carrel, A., Ekambaram, V., Gaker, D., Sengupta, R., Walker, J.L.: Quantified traveler: travel feedback meets the cloud to change behavior. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 19(2), 109–124 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jylhä, A., Nurmi, P., Sirén, M., Hemminki, S., Jacucci, G.: Matkahupi: a persuasive mobile application for sustainable mobility. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication, pp. 227–230. ACM, September 2013Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim, T., Hong, H., Magerko, B.: Designing for persuasion: toward ambient eco-visualization for awareness. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 106–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kollmuss, A., Zink, H., Polycarp, C.: Making sense of the voluntary carbon market: a comparison of carbon offset standards. In: WWF Germany, pp. 1–23 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lin, J.J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., Strub, H.B.: Fish’n’Steps: encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In: Dourish, P., Friday, A. (eds.) UbiComp 2006. LNCS, vol. 4206, pp. 261–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McAliney, M.: Arguments for Land Conservation: Documentation and Information Sources for Land Resources Protection. Trust for Public Land, Sacramento (1993)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nordlund, A.M., Garvill, J.: Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. J. Environ. Psychol. 23(4), 339–347 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nieman, A.: Concrete vs abstract visualization. In: Hohl, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the ADSVIS 2011: Making Visible the Invisible: Art, Design and Science in Data Visualisation, p. 49. University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield. ISBN 978-1-86218-103-8 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pucher, J., Dill, J., Handy, S.: Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. Prev. Med. 50, S106–S125 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pina, L.R., Ramirez, E., Griswold, W.G.: Fitbit+: a behavior-based intervention system to reduce sedentary behavior. In: 2012 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), pp. 175–178. IEEE, May 2012Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Petersen, J.E., Frantz, C., Shammin, R.: Using sociotechnical feedback to engage, educate, motivate and empower environmental thought and action. Solutions 5(1), 79–87 (2014)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rails-To-Trails Conservency, Pathway to Prosperity (2016). http://magazine.railstotrails.org/resources/magflipbooks/2016_fall/index.html
  31. 31.
    Sorell, M.L.: Transportation choices: can social marketing make a difference? (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (2005) Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Steg, L., Gifford, R.: Sustainable transportation and quality of life. J. Transp. Geogr. 13(1), 59–69 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schultz, P.W.: The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. J. Environ. Psychol. 21, 327–339 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schwartz, S.H.: Awareness of consequences and the influence of moral norms on interpersonal behavior. Sociometry 31, 355–369 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schrammel, J., Busch, M., Tscheligi, M.: Peacox-persuasive advisor for CO2-reducing cross-modal trip planning. In: PERSUASIVE (Adjunct Proceedings) (2013)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T.D., Guagnano, G.A., Kalof, L.: A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6(2), 81–97 (1999)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thompson, S.C.G., Barton, M.A.: Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. J. Environ. Psychol. 14(2), 149–157 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Triplett, T., Santos, R., Rosenbloom, S., Tefft, B.: American Driving Survey: 2014–2015 (2016)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Walpole, S.C., Prieto-Merino, D., Edwards, P., Cleland, J., Stevens, G., Roberts, I.: The weight of nations: an estimation of adult human biomass. BMC Public Health 12(1), 439 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Willis, D.P., Manaugh, K., El-Geneidy, A.: Cycling under influence: summarizing the influence of perceptions, attitudes, habits, and social environments on cycling for transportation. Inte. J. Sustain. Transp. 9(8), 565–579 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yellowstone Park Emits Tons of Carbon Dioxide, Study Finds, 25 December 1997. http://www.nytimes.com/1997/12/26/us/yellowstone-park-emits-tons-of-carbon-dioxide-study-finds.html. Accessed 29 May 2015
  42. 42.
    World Bank, Ecofys, Vivid Economics: State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2016. Washington, DC: World Bank. © World Bank (2016). https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/25160. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO

Publicly Available Green Travel Apps

  1. 43.
    CommuteGreener: commutegreener.com
  2. 44.
  3. 45.
    CarbonDiem: carbondiem.com
  4. 46.
    CityMapper: citymapper.co
  5. 47.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hannah Park
    • 1
    Email author
  • Angela Sanguinetti
    • 1
  • Gabriel Castillo Cortes
    • 1
  1. 1.Consumer Energy Interfaces LabUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations