Advertisement

A Comparative Usability Analysis of Virtual Reality Goggles

  • Ana Carol Pontes de FrançaEmail author
  • Danilo Fernandes Vitorino
  • Aline de Oliveira Neves
  • Cristiane Nunes de Lima
  • Marcelo Márcio Soares
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10289)

Abstract

The emergence of Virtual Reality goggles with low prices and higher technological simplicity contributed to a further spread of VR among smartphone users. Focused on this type of immersive device, this study consists in a comparative usability analysis of two virtual reality goggles. The adopted criteria to choose the devices was the compatibility with most smartphones and consequently their use by a wide range of users. For the study, we adopted the Leventhal and Barnes’ usability model in order to investigate: the ease of learning, ease of use, ease of relearning, flexibility and task match. Finally, it sought to verify the positive and negative aspects in which concerns to the analyzed products in order to make recommendations to improve the quality of use of these devices.

Keywords

Virtual reality VR goggles Immersive devices Usability 

References

  1. 1.
    França, A.C.P., Pereira Neto, J., Soares, M.M.: We are all cyborgs: Body-machine and body-information in virtual reality systems. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2016. LNCS, vol. 9748, pp. 287–293. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40406-6_27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    França, A.C.P., Soares, M.M.: Metaphors and embodiment in virtual reality systems. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2016. LNCS, vol. 9748, pp. 278–286. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40406-6_26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soares, M., et. al.: Virtual reality in consumer product design: Methods and applications. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics in Consumer Product Design: Methods and Techniques. CRC Press (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    França, A.C.P., Soares, M.: Dialogical self on virtual reality systems: Presence and embodiment in human situated interaction. In: 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE (2015)aGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    França, A.C.P., Soares, M.: Realidade Virtual Aplicada à Educação: a era Matrix do processo de ensino e aprendizagem. XIII Congresso Internacional de Tecnologias na Educação (2015)bGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tullis, T., Albert, B.: Measuring the user experience: Collecting, analyzing and presenting usability metrics. Elsevier, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krug, S.: Don’t Make Me Think! A common sense approach to web usability. New Riders Press, IndianaPolis (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jordan, P.: An Introduction to Usability. Taylor & Francis, London (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ISO/IEC 9241-11. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDT)s - Part II Guidance on Usability (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leventhal, L., Barnes, J.: Usability Engineering: Process, Products and Examples. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shackel, B.: The concept of usability. In: Bennett, J., Case, D., Sandelin, J., Smith, M. (eds.) Visual Display Terminals: Usability Issues and Health Concerns. Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1984)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, San Diego (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eason, K.D.: Towards the experimental study of usability. Behav. Inf. Technol. 3(2), 133–143 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Catecati, T., et al.: Métodos Para a Avaliação da Usabilidade no Design de Produtos. DAPesquisa: Revista de Investigação em Artes, Florianópolis 8(8), 564–581 (2010). Jul. 2011 Disponível em: <http://www.ceart.udesc.br/dapesquisa/edicoes_anteriores/8/files/04DESIGN_Fernanda_Gomes_Faust.pdf>
  15. 15.
    Jasper, M.W.M.: A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: Methodological aspects and empirical evidence. Int. J. Med. Informatics 78(5), 340–353 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Carol Pontes de França
    • 1
    Email author
  • Danilo Fernandes Vitorino
    • 1
  • Aline de Oliveira Neves
    • 1
  • Cristiane Nunes de Lima
    • 1
  • Marcelo Márcio Soares
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of DesignFederal University of PernambucoRecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations