Discounted Prototyping of Virtual Reality Solutions for Science Education

  • Ghislain Maurice Norbert IsabweEmail author
  • Margrethe Synnøve Moxnes
  • Marie Ristesund
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10289)


Science education requires experimental work for learners to achieve the intended learning outcomes, which sometimes involve abstract concepts by nature. Advances in digital technology can help learners to undertake experimental work, which would otherwise be costly, either due to the scarcity of laboratory equipment or safety requirements. However, one of the major concerns resides into how to design usable learning solutions from the users’ perspective. That would require the involvement of users at all stages of design and development process, even if the technology itself could still be in its infancy. It can be very helpful to present the new design concepts to potential users at a very early stage, with rough models or low fidelity prototypes just to communicate the solution ideas. Such a prototype helps to better understand users’ needs and requirements as well as to test and evaluate perceived usability as well the user experience at early stages of the human-centred design process. This work presents a cost-effective approach to low fidelity prototyping for virtual reality based solutions. Virtual reality is modelled through physical objects to allow sample users feel and experience the learning of chemistry concepts through active experimentation. The prototype is made out of everyday components to create an experience of virtual reality in a real physical world. That included paper, prints, boxes, bottles and a book to represent a chemical bonding experiment in an outdoor scenario. User testing proved this prototyping technique to be very practical as well as cost effective.


Virtual Reality Low fidelity prototype Human-Centred Design 


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Aabakken, L.: virtuell virkelighet i medisin - Store Norske Leksikon, 09 April 2015. [Cited: 21 August 2016]
  5. 5.
    Swanson, J.: The Year of Virtual Reality – KnowledgeWorks, 11 May 2016. [Cited: 12 September 2016]
  6. 6.
    Google. Google Cardboard. [Cited: 21 August 2016]
  7. 7.
    Daydream - Headset (2016).
  8. 8.
    Samsung. Samsung Gear VR. [Cited: 21 August 2016]
  9. 9.
    Oculus Gear. Gear VR powered by Oculus. [Cited: 21 August 2016]
  10. 10.
    Sony. Playstation VR - Virtual Reality headset for PS4. [Cited: 21 September 2016]
  11. 11.
    Oculus. Oculus Rift. [Cited: 21 August 2016]
  12. 12.
    HTC Vive. Vive. [Cited: 21 August 2016]
  13. 13.
    Statista. Forecast unit shipments of virtual reality head-mounted displays worldwide from 2015 to 2017 (in million units). [Cited: 21 August 2016]
  14. 14.
    Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., Preece, J.: Interaction Design - Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd edn. Wiley, West Sussex (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gill, S.: PAIPR prototyping: some thoughts on the role of the prototype in the 21st century. In: Valentine, L. (ed.) Prototype: Design and Craft in the 21st Century. Bloomsbury Academic (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    International Standard Organization. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (ISO 9241-210:2010), October 2010Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maguire, M.: Methods to support human-centred design. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 55(4), 587–634 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 22, 136–165 (1932)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robertson, J., Robertson, S.: Volere Requirements Specification Template. [Template], 16th edn. Atlantic Systems Guild, London (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    IEEE Computer Society. Software Engineering Standards Committee & IEEE-SA Standards Board. IEEE Recommended Practice for Software Requirements Specifications. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Benyon, D.: Designing Interactive Systems: A Comprehensive Guide to HCI, UX and Interaction Design, 3rd edn. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kolb, D.A.: Experiential Learning, Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, pp. 26–33. Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey (1984)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barakat, R.A.: Storyboarding can help your proposal. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 32(1), 20–25 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schön, D.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rettig, M.: Prototyping for tiny fingers. Commun. ACM 37, 21–27 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grady, H.M.: Web site design: a case study in usability testing using paper prototypes. In: Proceedings of IEEE Professional Communication Society International Communication Conference and Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM International Conference on Computer Documentation: Technology & Teamwork, pp. 39–45. IEEE Educational Activities Department (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ghislain Maurice Norbert Isabwe
    • 1
    Email author
  • Margrethe Synnøve Moxnes
    • 1
  • Marie Ristesund
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AgderGrimstadNorway

Personalised recommendations