Advertisement

A Conceptual Model for Educational Game Authoring: A Showcase in Math Games

  • Johan BaldeónEmail author
  • Anna Puig
  • Inmaculada Rodríguez
  • Cristian Muriel
  • Leandro Zardain
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10289)

Abstract

The educational game development is a multidisciplinary software engineering process, where participate instructional and game designers, artists and programmers. Nevertheless, educators, who have an important role in the process, have limitations in authoring games at any moment to adapt them according to key educational aspects such as intended learning outcomes and their metrics, students’ learning styles, teaching and learning activities and embedded assessment. We propose a conceptual domain model that supports the development process of educational game authoring tools taking into account both educational and game domains. We consider authoring in two domains. In the educational domain, teachers configure/modify either generic activities with any curricular content, or specific learning activities with a concrete one. In the game domain teachers configure/modify game elements and challenges. Finally, we present two educational game authoring tools in the domain of maths supported by the proposed conceptual model.

Keywords

Serious game Game-based learning Educational game authoring 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank projects TIN2012–38876–C02–02, 2014SGR623, TIN2015–66863–C2–1–R (MINECO/FEDER), Carolina Foundation, Sergi Cebrian, David Rausell and the contribution of Avatar Group members for supporting the development of this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., Wittrock, M.C.: A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M.B., Bellotti, F., Freitas, S., Louchart, S., Suttie, N., Berta, R., De Gloria, A.: Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 46(2), 391–411 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baldeón, J., Rodríguez, I., Puig, A.: LEGA: A LEarner-centered GAmification design framework. In: Proceedings of 17th International Conference on HCI. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baldeón, J., Rodríguez, I., Puig, A., Gómez, D., Grau, S.: From learning to game mechanics: the design and the analysis of a serious game for computer literacy. In: 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1–6 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bethke, E.: Game Development and Production. Wordware Publishing Inc., Plano (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biggs, J.: Aligning Teaching for Constructing Learning, pp. 1–4. The Higher Education Academy, Heslingtonpp (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. Longmans, Green and Co., London (1956)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Canals, M.: Fracciones. Los dossiers de Maria Antonia Canals (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Desurvire, H., Wiberg, C.: Game usability heuristics (PLAY) for Evaluating and designing better games: the next iteration. In: Ozok, A.A., Zaphiris, P. (eds.) OCSC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5621, pp. 557–566. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02774-1_60 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dick, W., Carey, L., Carey, J.O., et al.: The Systematic Design of Instruction, vol. 5. Longman, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Erwin, T.D.: Assessing student learning and development: a guide to the principles, goals, and methods of determining college outcomes (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gagne, R.M., Briggs, L.J.: Principles of Instructional Design. Rinehart & Winston, Holt (1974)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harlen, W., James, M.: Assessment and learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Asses. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract. 4(3), 365–379 (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hays, R.T.: The effectiveness of instructional games: a literature review and discussion. Technical report, DTIC Document (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kapp, K.M.: The Gamification of Learning and Instruction Fieldbook: Ideas into Practice. Wiley, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kirkley, S.E., Tomblin, S., Kirkley, J.: Instructional design authoring support for the development of serious games and mixed reality training. In: Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (I/ITSEC). Citeseer (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mehm, F., Konert, J., Göbel, S., Steinmetz, R.: An authoring tool for adaptive digital educational games. In: Ravenscroft, A., Lindstaedt, S., Kloos, C.D., Hernández-Leo, D. (eds.) EC-TEL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7563, pp. 236–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33263-0_19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morrison, G.R., Ross, S.M., Kemp, J.E., Kalman, H.: Designing Effective Instruction. Wiley, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roungas, B., Dalpiaz, F.: A model-driven framework for educational game design. In: De Gloria, A., Veltkamp, R. (eds.) GALA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9599, pp. 1–11. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40216-1_1 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spady, W.G.: Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. ERIC, Arlington (1994)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Surgenor, P.: Teaching Toolkit, Planning a Teaching Session, 1st edn. UCD Teaching and Learning, Dublin (2010). http://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/UCDTLT0022.pdf Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tang, S., Hanneghan, M.: Game content model: an ontology for documenting serious game design. In: Developments in E-systems Engineering (DeSE 2011), pp. 431–436. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tang, S., Hanneghan, M., Carter, C.: A platform independent game technology model for model driven serious games development. Electron. J. e-Learn. 11(1), 61–79 (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Torrente, J., Del Blanco, Á., Marchiori, E.J., Moreno-Ger, P., Fernández-Manjón, B.: \(<\)e-adventure\(>\): introducing educational games in the learning process. In: IEEE EDUCON 2010 Conference, pp. 1121–1126. IEEE, April 2010Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van Eck, R.: Digital game-based learning: it’s not just the digital natives who are restless. EDUCAUSE Rev. 41(2), 16 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van Est, C., Poelman, R., Bidarra, R.: High-level scenario editing for serious games. In: GRApp, pp. 339–346 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wiggins, B.E.: An overview and study on the use of games, simulations, and gamification in higher education. Int. J. Game-Based Learn. (IJGBL) 6(1), 18–29 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yessad, A., Labat, J.M., Kermorvant, F.: Segae: a serious game authoring environment. In: 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 538–540. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johan Baldeón
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Anna Puig
    • 2
  • Inmaculada Rodríguez
    • 2
  • Cristian Muriel
    • 2
  • Leandro Zardain
    • 2
  1. 1.Avatar Group, Informatic Section, Engineering DepartmentPontificia Universidad Católica del PerúLimaPeru
  2. 2.WAI Research Group, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, IMUB and UBICS Research InstitutesUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations