Abstract
Dogma and skepticism are not necessarily universal tendencies to be applied regardless of subject. It is possible to be skeptical about some things and dogmatic about others. Indeed, unless dogma is to become utter rigidity, and skepticism sheer disbelief, there must be some combination that varies by object and degree—one trusts science more than astrology, family more than statesmen. There are contexts in which skepticism may be misplaced. Perhaps there are even experiments showing that assuming a posture of scientific skepticism toward loved ones (“How are you?” “What do you mean exactly?”) is counterproductive (though some relationships may last as long as an hour under this onslaught). It is important, therefore, to differentiate the object of skepticism and the degree of dogma.
“Seek simplicity and distrust it”
Alfred North Whitehead
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wildavsky, A. (2018). Skepticism and Dogma in the White House: Jimmy Carter’s Theory of Governing. In: Peters, B. (eds) The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58619-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58619-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58618-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58619-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)