Abstract
Mendel’s First Law of Genetics states that a pair of alleles segregates randomly during meiosis so that one copy of each is represented equally in gametes. Whereas male meiosis produces four equal sperm, in female meiosis only one cell, the egg, survives, and the others degenerate. Meiotic drive is a process in which a selfish DNA element exploits female meiotic asymmetry and segregates preferentially to the egg in violation of Mendel’s First Law, thereby increasing its transmission to the offspring and frequency in a population. In principle, the selfish element can consist either of a centromere that increases its transmission via an altered kinetochore connection to the meiotic spindle or a centromere-like element that somehow bypasses the kinetochore altogether in doing so. There are now examples from eukaryotic model systems for both types of meiotic drive. Although meiotic drive has profound evolutionary consequences across many species, relatively little is known about the underlying mechanisms. We discuss examples in various systems and open questions about the underlying cell biology, and propose a mechanism to explain biased segregation in mammalian female meiosis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agulnik SI, Agulnik AI, Ruvinsky AO (1990) Meiotic drive in female mice heterozygous for the HSR inserts on chromosome 1. Genet Res 55:97–100
Agulnik SI, Adolph S, Winking H, Traut W (1993a) Zoogeography of the chromosome 1 of the house mouse (Mus musculus). Hereditas 39–46
Agulnik SI, Sabantsev ID, Orlova GV, Ruvinsky AO (1993b) Meiotic drive on aberrant chromosome 1 in the mouse is determined by a linked distorter. Genet Res 61:91–96
Agulnik SI, Sabantsev ID, Ruvinsky AO (1993c) Effect of sperm genotype on chromatid segregation in female mice heterozygous for aberrant chromosome 1. Genet Res 61:97–100
Aniskin VM, Benazzou T, Biltueva L et al (2006) Unusually extensive karyotype reorganization in four congeneric Gerbillus species (Muridae: Gerbillinae). Cytogenet Genome Res 112:131–140. doi:10.1159/000087525
Banaei-Moghaddam AM, Schubert V, Kumke K et al (2012) Nondisjunction in favor of a chromosome: the mechanism of rye B chromosome drive during pollen mitosis. Plant Cell 24:4124–4134. doi:10.1105/tpc.112.105270
Bassett EA, Wood S, Salimian KJ et al (2010) Epigenetic centromere specification directs aurora B accumulation but is insufficient to efficiently correct mitotic errors. J Cell Biol 190:177–185. doi:10.1083/jcb.201001035
Bassett EA, DeNizio J, Barnhart-Dailey MC et al (2012) HJURP uses distinct CENP-A surfaces to recognize and to stabilize CENP-A/histone H4 for centromere assembly. Dev Cell 22:749–762. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2012.02.001
Black BE, Cleveland DW (2011) Epigenetic centromere propagation and the nature of CENP-A nucleosomes. Cell 144:471–479. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.002
Black BE, Foltz DR, Chakravarthy S et al (2004) Structural determinants for generating centromeric chromatin. Nature 430:578–582. doi:10.1038/nature02766
Bodor DL, Valente LP, Mata JF et al (2013) Assembly in G1 phase and long-term stability are unique intrinsic features of CENP-A nucleosomes. Mol Biol Cell 24:923–932. doi:10.1091/mbc.E13-01-0034
Buckland RA, Evans HJ (1978) Cytogenetic aspects of phylogeny in the Bovidae. I. G-banding. Cytogenet Cell Genet 21:42–63
Buckler ES, Phelps-Durr TL, Buckler CS et al (1999) Meiotic drive of chromosomal knobs reshaped the maize genome. Genetics 153:415–426
Burt A, Trivers R (2006) Genes in Conflict. Harvard University Press
Carabatsos MJ, Combelles CM, Messinger SM, Albertini DF (2000) Sorting and reorganization of centrosomes during oocyte maturation in the mouse. Microsc Res Tech 49:435–444. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(20000601)49:5<435:AID-JEMT5>3.0.CO;2-H
Carroll CW, Silva MCC, Godek KM et al (2009) Centromere assembly requires the direct recognition of CENP-A nucleosomes by CENP-N. Nat Cell Biol 11:896–902. doi:10.1038/ncb1899
Carroll CW, Milks KJ, Straight AF (2010) Dual recognition of CENP-A nucleosomes is required for centromere assembly. J Cell Biol 189:1143–1155. doi:10.1083/jcb.201001013
Cattanach BM (1962) XO mice. Genet Res 487–490
Chmátal L, Gabriel SI, Mitsainas GP et al (2014) Centromere strength provides the cell biological basis for meiotic drive and karyotype evolution in mice. Curr Biol 24:2295–2300. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.017
Cortes DB, McNally KL, Mains PE, McNally FJ (2015) The asymmetry of female meiosis reduces the frequency of inheritance of unpaired chromosomes. Elife. doi:10.7554/eLife.06056
Crowder ME, Strzelecka M, Wilbur JD et al (2015) A comparative analysis of spindle morphometrics across metazoans. Curr Biol 25:1542–1550. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.036
Dawe RK, Cande WZ (1996) Induction of centromeric activity in maize by suppressor of meiotic drive 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:8512–8517
Dawe RK, Reed LM, Yu HG et al (1999) A maize homolog of mammalian CENPC is a constitutive component of the inner kinetochore. Plant Cell 11:1227–1238
de Villena F, Sapienza C (2001) Transmission ratio distortion in offspring of heterozygous female carriers of Robertsonian translocations. Hum Genet 108:31–36. doi:10.1007/s004390000437
Didion JP, Morgan AP, Clayshulte AM-F et al (2015) A multi-megabase copy number gain causes maternal transmission ratio distortion on mouse chromosome 2. PLoS Genet 11:1004850. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004850
Evans JA, Canning N, Hunter AG et al (1978) A cytogenetic survey of 14,069 newborn infants. III. An analysis of the significance and cytologic behavior of the Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations. Cytogenet Cell Genet 20:96–123
Fachinetti D, Han JS, McMahon MA et al (2015) DNA sequence-specific binding of CENP-B enhances the fidelity of human centromere function. Dev Cell 33:314–327. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2015.03.020
Falk SJ, Guo LY, Sekulic N et al (2015) Chromosomes. CENP-C reshapes and stabilizes CENP-A nucleosomes at the centromere. Science 348:699–703. doi:10.1126/science.1259308
Falk SJ, Lee J, Sekulic N et al (2016) CENP-C directs a structural transition of CENP-A nucleosomes mainly through sliding of DNA gyres. Nat Struct Mol Biol 23:204–208. doi:10.1038/nsmb.3175
Fang J, Liu Y, Wei Y et al (2015) Structural transitions of centromeric chromatin regulate the cell cycle-dependent recruitment of CENP-N. Genes Dev 29:1058–1073. doi:10.1101/gad.259432.115
Fishman L, Saunders A (2008) Centromere-associated female meiotic drive entails male fitness costs in monkeyflowers. Science 322:1559–1562. doi:10.1126/science.1161406
Fishman L, Willis JH (2005) A novel meiotic drive locus almost completely distorts segregation in mimulus (monkeyflower) hybrids. Genetics 169:347–353. doi:10.1534/genetics.104.032789
Fluminhan A, Kameya T (1997) Involvement of knob heterochromatin in mitotic abnormalities in germinating aged seeds of maize. Genome 40:91–98
Folco HD, Campbell CS, May KM et al (2015) The CENP-A N-tail confers epigenetic stability to centromeres via the CENP-T branch of the CCAN in fission yeast. Curr Biol 25:348–356. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.060
Foltz DR, Jansen LET, Bailey AO et al (2009) Centromere-specific assembly of CENP-A nucleosomes is mediated by HJURP. Cell 137:472–484. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.039
Garagna S, Page J, Fernandez-Donoso R et al (2014) The Robertsonian phenomenon in the house mouse: mutation, meiosis and speciation. Chromosoma 123:529–544. doi:10.1007/s00412-014-0477-6
Gorelick R, Fraser D, Mansfield M et al (2016) Abrupt shortening of bird W chromosomes in ancestral Neognathae. Biol J Linn Soc 119:488–496. doi:10.1111/bij.12832
Green MC (1981) Genetic variants and strains of the laboratory mouse. Fischer, New York, pp 339–343
Gropp A, Tettenborn U, von Lehman E (1969) Chromosomenuntersuchungen bei der Tabakmaus (M. poschiavinus) und bei den Hybriden mit der Laboratorumsmaus. Experientia 25:875–876
Guo LY, Allu PK, Zandarashvili L et al (2017) Centromeres are maintained by fastening CENP-A to DNA and directing an arginine anchor-dependent nucleosome transition. Nat Commun 8:15775. doi:10.1038/ncomms15775
Hasson D, Panchenko T, Salimian KJ et al (2013) The octamer is the major form of CENP-A nucleosomes at human centromeres. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:687–695. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2562
Hauffe HC, Giménez MD, Searle JB (2012) Chromosomal hybrid zones in the house mouse. In: Evolution of the house mouse. Cambridge University Press, pp 407–430
Henikoff S, Ahmad K, Malik HS (2001) The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 293:1098–1102. doi:10.1126/science.1062939
Hewitt GM (1976) Meiotic drive for B-chromosomes in the primary oocytes of Myrmeleotettix maculatus (Orthopera: Acrididae). Chromosoma 56:381–391
Hodgkin J, Horvitz HR, Brenner S (1979) Nondisjunction mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 91:67–94
Hou J, Friedrich A, de Montigny J, Schacherer J (2014) Chromosomal rearrangements as a major mechanism in the onset of reproductive isolation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Biol 24:1153–1159. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.063
Jacobs PA, Browne C, Gregson N et al (1992) Estimates of the frequency of chromosome abnormalities detectable in unselected newborns using moderate levels of banding. J Med Genet 29:103–108
Jones R (1991) B-chromosome drive. Am Nat 430–442
Jones R (1995) B chromosome in plants. New Phytol 131:411–434
Jones K (1998) Robertsonian fusion and centric fission in karyotype evolution of higher plants. Bot Rev 64:273–289
Jones R, Rees H (1982) B Chromosomes. Academic Press, London
Kato H, Jiang J, Zhou B-R et al (2013) A conserved mechanism for centromeric nucleosome recognition by centromere protein CENP-C. Science (80-)340:1110–1113. doi:10.1126/science.1235532
Kaufman MH (1972) Non-random segregation during mammalian oogenesis. Nature 238:465–466
LeMaire-Adkins R, Hunt PA (2000) Nonrandom segregation of the mouse univalent X chromosome: evidence of spindle-mediated meiotic drive. Genetics 156:775–783
Locke DP, Hillier LW, Warren WC et al (2011) Comparative and demographic analysis of orang-utan genomes. Nature 469:529–533. doi:10.1038/nature09687
Logsdon GA, Barrey EJ, Bassett EA et al (2015) Both tails and the centromere targeting domain of CENP-A are required for centromere establishment. J Cell Biol 208:521–531. doi:10.1083/jcb.201412011
Longley AE (1945) Abnormal segregation during megasporogenesis in Maize. Genetics 30:100–113
Lyttle TW (1991) Segregation distorters. Annu Rev Genet 25:511–557. doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.002455
Malik HS, Henikoff S (2009) Major evolutionary transitions in centromere complexity. Cell 138:1067–1082. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.036
Manieu C, González M, López-Fenner J et al (2014) Aneuploidy in spermatids of Robertsonian (Rb) chromosome heterozygous mice. Chromosome Res 22:545–557. doi:10.1007/s10577-014-9443-7
Mao X, Nie W, Wang J et al (2008) Comparative cytogenetics of bats (Chiroptera): the prevalence of Robertsonian translocations limits the power of chromosomal characters in resolving interfamily phylogenetic relationships. Chromosome Res 16:155–170. doi:10.1007/s10577-007-1206-2
Masumoto H, Masukata H, Muro Y et al (1989) A human centromere antigen (CENP-B) interacts with a short specific sequence in alphoid DNA, a human centromeric satellite. J Cell Biol 109:1963–1973. doi:10.1083/jcb.109.5.1963
McKinley KL, Cheeseman IM (2016) The molecular basis for centromere identity and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17:16–29. doi:10.1038/nrm.2015.5
Meng X, Fan H, Zhong Z et al (2004) Localization of gamma-tubulin in mouse eggs during meiotic maturation, fertilization, and early embryonic development. J Reprod Dev 50:97–105
Michaut MA, Williams CJ, Schultz RM (2005) Phosphorylated MARCKS: a novel centrosome component that also defines a peripheral subdomain of the cortical actin cap in mouse eggs. Dev Biol 280:26–37 S0012-1606(05)00007-2[pii]10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.01.006
Molina WF, Martinez PA, Bertollo LAC, Bidau CJ (2014) Evidence for meiotic drive as an explanation for karyotype changes in fishes. Mar Genomics 15:29–34. doi:10.1016/j.margen.2014.05.001
Nicklas RB (1997) How cells get the right chromosomes. Science (80-)275:632–637
Ӧstergren G (1945) Parasitic nature of extra fragment chromosomes. Bot Not 157–163
Panchenko T, Sorensen TC, Woodcock CL et al (2011) Replacement of histone H3 with CENP-A directs global nucleosome array condensation and loosening of nucleosome superhelical termini. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:16588–16593. doi:10.1073/pnas.1113621108
Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Sapienza C (2001a) Nonrandom segregation during meiosis: the unfairness of females. Mamm Genome 12:331–339. doi:10.1007/s003350040003
Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Sapienza C (2001b) Female meiosis drives karyotypic evolution in mammals. Genetics 159:1179–1189
Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, de la Casa-Esperon E, Briscoe TL, Sapienza C (2000) A genetic test to determine the origin of maternal transmission ratio distortion. Meiotic drive at the mouse Om locus. Genetics 154:333–342
Piálek J, Hauffe HC, Searle JB (2005) Chromosomal variation in the house mouse. Biol J Linn Soc 84:535–563
Rhoades MM (1942) Preferential egregation in maize. Genetics 27:395–407
Rhoades M (1952) Preferential segregation in maize. In: Gowen J (ed) Heterosis. Iowa College Press, Ames, pp 66–80
Rhoades MM, Vilkomerson H (1942) On the anaphase movement of chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 28:433–436
Roulland Y, Ouararhni K, Naidenov M et al (2016) The flexible ends of CENP-A nucleosome are required for mitotic fidelity. Mol Cell 63:674–685. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.023
Ruvinsky A (1995) Meiotic drive in female mice: an essay. Mamm Genome 6:315–320
Sabantsev I, Spitsin O, Agulnik S, Ruvinsky A (1993) Population dynamics of aberrant chromosome 1 in mice. Heredity (Edinb) 70(Pt 5):481–489
Sandler L, Novitski E (1957) Meiotic drive as an evolutionary force. Am Nat 91:105. doi:10.1086/281969
Sandler L, Hiraizumi Y, Sandler I (1959) Meiotic drive in natural populations of drosophila melanogaster. I. the cytogenetic basis of segregation-Distortion. Genetics 44:233–250
Sekulic N, Bassett EA, Rogers DJ, Black BE (2010) The structure of (CENP-A-H4)(2) reveals physical features that mark centromeres. Nature 467:347–351. doi:10.1038/nature09323
Shang WH, Hori T, Toyoda A et al (2010) Chickens possess centromeres with both extended tandem repeats and short non-tandem-repetitive sequences. Genome Res 20:1219–1228. doi:10.1101/gr.106245.110
Shuda K, Schindler K, Ma J et al (2009) Aurora kinase B modulates chromosome alignment in mouse oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 76:1094–1105. doi:10.1002/mrd.21075
Shurtliff QR (2013) Mammalian hybrid zones: a review. Mamm Rev 43:1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.2011.00205.x
Silvan CE, Black BE, Sivolob A et al (2007) CENP-A-containing nucleosomes: easier disassembly versus exclusive centromeric localization. J Mol Biol 370:555–573. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.04.064
Smoak EM, Stein P, Schultz RM et al (2016) Long-term retention of CENP-A nucleosomes in mammalian oocytes underpins transgenerational inheritance of centromere identity. Curr Biol 26:1110–1116. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.061
Tachiwana H, Kagawa W, Shiga T et al (2011) Crystal structure of the human centromeric nucleosome containing CENP-A. Nature 476:232–235. doi:10.1038/nature10258
Tachiwana H, Müller S, Blümer J et al (2015) HJURP involvement in de novo CenH3CENP-A and CENP-C recruitment. Cell Rep 11:22–32. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.013
Traut W, Winking H, Adolph S (1984) An extra segment in chromosome 1 of wild Mus musculus: a C-band positive homogeneously staining region. Cytogenet Cell Genet 38:290–297
Wade CM, Giulotto E, Sigurdsson S et al (2009) Genome sequence, comparative analysis, and population genetics of the domestic horse. Science (80-)326:865–867
Westhorpe FG, Fuller CJ, Straight AF (2015) A cell-free CENP-A assembly system defines the chromatin requirements for centromere maintenance. J Cell Biol 209:789–801. doi:10.1083/jcb.201503132
White MJ (1968) Models of speciation. New concepts suggest that the classical sympatric and allopatric models are not the only alternatives. Science 159:1065–1070
White TA, Bordewich M, Searle JB (2010) A network approach to study karyotypic evolution: the chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) and house mouse (Mus musculus) as model systems. Syst Biol 59:262–276. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq004
Wu G, Hao L, Han Z et al (2005) Maternal transmission ratio distortion at the mouse Om locus results from meiotic drive at the second meiotic division. Genetics 170:327–334. doi:10.1534/genetics.104.039479
Yu HG, Hiatt EN, Chan A et al (1997) Neocentromere-mediated chromosome movement in maize. J Cell Biol 139:831–840. doi:10.1083/jcb.139.4.831
Yukimenko LV, Korobitsyna KV (1988) A rare variant of the chromosome 1 in house mouse: occurence of two extra heterochromatin segments. Genetica 376–378
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chmátal, L., Schultz, R.M., Black, B.E., Lampson, M.A. (2017). Cell Biology of Cheating—Transmission of Centromeres and Other Selfish Elements Through Asymmetric Meiosis. In: Black, B. (eds) Centromeres and Kinetochores. Progress in Molecular and Subcellular Biology, vol 56. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58592-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58592-5_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58591-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58592-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)