Abstract
Transparency is seen as one important property of open government. The growing importance of government transparency is shown through legislation being passed by most democratic countries during the last few decades. Transparency is based on legislation, regulations and other policy documents. Information and communication technology can help improving the transparency of political decision-making. In smart cities, technology can support transparency in a number of ways, ranging from making documents available online to transparency in the decision-making process. The purpose of this chapter is to provide government officials and other interested parties with an overview of the technologies that are available for transparency in smart cities, and to present lessons learned from cases the authors have been involved in. These lessons can be valuable for decision-makers working towards smart city developments.
This work was partially supported by a grant from Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway, contract type “small size bilateral cooperation projects”, “Scholarships and inter-institutional cooperation” program—EEA Financial Mechanism 2009–2014, Project Number RO15-0059 “Public Sector Renewal Through ICT, A Life-long Learning Approach”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allwinkle, S., & Cruickshank, P. (2011). Creating smart-er cities: An overview. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 1–16. doi:10.1080/10630732.2011.601103
Angelidou, M. (2015). Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces. Cities, 47, 95–106. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.004
Anthopoulos, L. G., Siozos, P., & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2007). Applying participatory design and collaboration in digital public services for discovering and re-designing e-Government services. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 353–376. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.07.018
Appel, S. U., Botti, D., Jamison, J., Plant, L., Shyr, J. Y., & Varshney, L. R. (2014). Predictive analytics can facilitate proactive property vacancy policies for cities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 161–173. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.028
Appelgren, E., & Nygren, G. (2014). Data journalism in Sweden. Digital Journalism, 2(3), 394–405. doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.884344
Axelsson, K., Melin, U., & Lindgren, I. (2010). Exploring the importance of citizen participation and involvement in e-government projects: Practice, incentives, and organization. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4(4), 299–321. doi:10.1108/17506161011081309
Berners-Lee, T. (2015). Linked data. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
Bernt, J. F., & Hove, H. (2009). Offentleglova med kommentarer. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Berntzen, L., & Johannessen, M. R. (2016). The role of citizen participation in municipal Smart City projects: Lessons learned from Norway. In J. R. Gil-Garcia, T. A. Pardo, & T. Nam (Eds.), Smarter as the new urban agenda: A comprehensive view of the 21st Century City. Switzerland: Springer.
Bertot, J. C., & Jaeger, P. T. (2008). The E-Government paradox: Better customer service doesn’t necessarily cost less. Government Information Quarterly, 25(2), 149–154. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.10.002
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
Bhoraskar, R., Vankadhara, N., Raman, B., & Kulkarni, P. (2012, 3–7 Jan 2012). Wolverine: Traffic and road condition estimation using smartphone sensors. Paper presented at the 2012 Fourth International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS).
Bianchini, D., & Avila, I. (2014). Smart cities and their smart decisions: Ethical considerations. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 33(1), 34–40. doi:10.1109/MTS.2014.2301854
Birkland, T. A. (2001). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. New York: ME Sharpe Inc.
Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., et al. (2012). Understanding smart city initiatives: An integrative and comprehensive theoretical framework. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
Coddington, M. (2015). Clarifying journalism’s quantitative turn. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 331–348. doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.976400
Doran, M.-A., & Daniel, S. (2014). Geomatics and Smart City: A transversal contribution to the Smart City development. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government and Democracy in the Information Age, 19(1/2), 57–72. doi:10.3233/IP-140330
Garau, C. (2014). From territory to smartphone: Smart fruition of cultural heritage for dynamic tourism development. Planning Practice and Research, 29, 238–255. doi:10.1080/02697459.2014.929837
Garrett, J. J. (2010). Elements of user experience, the: User-centered design for the web and beyond. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Goodspeed, R. (2015). Smart cities: Moving beyond urban cybernetics to tackle wicked problems. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 79–92. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu013
Gurstein, M. B. (2011). Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone?
Hunt, M., & Chapman, R. A. (2006). Open government and freedom of information. In M. Hunt & R. A. Chapman (Eds.), Open government in a theoretical and practical context. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Iivari, J., & Iivari, N. (2011). Varieties of user-centredness: an analysis of four systems development methods. Information Systems Journal, 21(2), 125–153. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00351.x
James, S. (2006). The potential benefits of freedom of information. In M. Hunt & R. A. Chapman (Eds.), Open government in a theoretical and practical context. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Janssen, K. (2011). The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments. Government Information Quarterly, 28(4), 446–456. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.01.004
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
Karlsson, F., Holgersson, J., Söderström, E., & Hedström, K. (2012). Exploring user participation approaches in public e-service development. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 158–168. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.009
Keehley, P., Medlin, S., MacBride, S., & Longmire, L. (1997). Benchmarking for best practices in the public sector. San Fransico: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Kling, R. (1977). The organizational context of user-centered software designs. MIS Quarterly, 1(4), 41–52. doi:10.2307/249021
Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2009). Is transparency the key to reducing corruption in resource-rich countries? World Development, 37(3), 521–532. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.07.002
Kongeriget Norges Grundlov. (2004). Available at https://www.stortinget.no/globalassets/pdf/english/constitutionenglish.pdf
Liao, S.-H., Chu, P.-H., & Hsiao, P.-Y. (2012). Data mining techniques and applications: A decade review from 2000 to 2011. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), 11303–11311. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.063
Lidberg, J. (2009). The international freedom of information index: The promise and practice of FOI laws. Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Müller.
Massa, P., & Campagna, M. (2014). Social media geographic information: recent findings and opportunities for smart spatial planning. Tema: Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment. doi:10.6092/1970-9870/2500
McDonald, A., & Terrill, G. (1998). Open Government: Freedom of information and privacy. London: Macmillan Press.
Norwegian ministry of justice and police (2004). St. meld. nr. 26 (2003–2004) Om endring av Grunnloven § 100.
Norwegian ministry of justice and police (2000). St. meld. nr. 42 (1999–2000) Om endring av Grunnloven § 100.
Quercia, D., & Saez, D. (2014). Mining urban deprivation from foursquare: Implicit crowdsourcing of city land use. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 13(2), 30–36. doi:10.1109/MPRV.2014.31
Reports, O. N. (1990). NOU 1990:13. “Forslag til ny lov om kommuner og fylkeskommuer” (New Local Government Act): Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development.
Reports, O. N. (1999). NOU 1999:27 “Ytringsfrihed bør finde sted” Forslag til ny Grunnlov § 100.
Roche, S. (2014). Geographic information science I: Why does a smart city need to be spatially enabled? Progress in Human Geography, 38(5), 703–711. doi:10.1177/0309132513517365
Sáez-Martín, A., Haro-de-Rosario, A., & Caba-Perez, C. (2014). A vision of social media in the Spanish smartest cities. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(4), 521–544. doi:10.1108/TG-03-2014-0010
Seger, A. (2008). Corruption and democracy: What are the issues? Corruption and democracy: Political finances–conflicts of interest–lobbying–justice. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Stratigea, A., Papadopoulou, C.-A., & Panagiotopoulou, M. (2015). Tools and technologies for planning the development of smart cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(2), 43–62. doi:10.1080/10630732.2015.1018725
The Norwegian Ministry of Government Administration, R. a. C. A. (2012). Digitizing Public Sector Services, Norwegian eGovernment Program.
The Norwegian Parliament Environmental Information Act. (2003). Availble from https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2003-05-09-31?q=milj%C3%B8
The Norwegian Parliament Local Government Act. (1992). Available from https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1992-09-25-107?q=kommuneloven
The Norwegian Parliament Public Administrations Act. (1967). Available from https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1967-02-10?q=forvaltningslov
The Norwegian Parliament Statistics Act. (1989). Available from https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1989-06-16-54
Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: When does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes? Public Administration Review, 71(6), 880–892. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02417.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johannessen, M.R., Berntzen, L. (2018). The Transparent Smart City. In: Rodríguez Bolívar, M. (eds) Smart Technologies for Smart Governments. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58577-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58577-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58576-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58577-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)