Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neo-Colonialism and Donor Interventions: Western Aid Mechanisms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neo-Colonialism and the Poverty of 'Development' in Africa

Part of the book series: Contemporary African Political Economy ((CONTAPE))

Abstract

Western aid-giving is couched in a progressive language of poverty reduction and human wellbeing. This chapter, however, casts critical light upon three Western aid modalities; project aid, budget support and aid ‘blending’ initiatives. It illustrates the way in which Western donor aid is often used as a subsidy for foreign corporate involvement in Africa despite dubious returns for the poorer citizenry in developing countries. For example, the chapter queries the ‘development’ auspices of private sector development (PSD) and Aid for Trade interventions carried out by the European Commission. It also challenges the role of development finance institutions (DFIs) in so-called aid blending projects, which combine public tax-payers money to DFI capital in African infrastructure projects. Donor budget support, meanwhile, is deemed a genuine obstacle to empirical sovereignty in African countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ActionAid. (2004). Turning off the taps: Donor conditionality and water privatisation in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. London: ActionAid.

    Google Scholar 

  • ActionAid. (2015, May). New alliance, new risk of land grabs: Evidence from Malawi, Nigeria, Senegal and Tanzania. London: Action Aid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, R. (2010). The rise of budget support in European development co-operation: A false panacea. FRIDE Policy Brief, No. 31, January. Madrid: FRIDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armon, J. (2007). Aid, Politics and Development. Development Policy Review, 25(5), 653–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayart, J. F. (2010). The state in Africa: The politics of the belly. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. (2012). James Ibori: How a thief almost became Nigeria’s president. BBC News, 28 February 2012. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-17184075 Accessed 30 July 2017.

  • Bracking, S. (2009). Money and power: Great predators in the political economy of development. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, H., & Njinkeu, D. (2008). Aid for trade and private sector development. In D. Njinkeu & H. Cameron (Eds.), Aid for Trade and Development (pp. 369–392). Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, S. (2016). Inducing food insecurity: Financialisation and development in the post-2015 Era. Third World Quarterly, 37(5), 768–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDC. (2015). New investment from the UK government to help boost jobs in the world’s poorest places. London: CDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian Aid. (2001). Water privatization in Ghana. London: Christian Aid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian Aid. (2005). The damage done: Aid, death and dogma. London: Christian Aid.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Renzio, P., & Hanlon, J., (2007). Contested sovereignty in Mozambique: The dilemmas of aid dependence. GEG Working Paper, 2007/25. Oxford: University College Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFID. (2008). Private sector development strategy—Prosperity for all: Making markets work. London: DfID.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFID. (2015). UK aid: Tackling global challenges in the national interest. London: DfID.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2017, February 2). Priti patel does economics: DFID tries to justify its existence. The Economist.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIB. (2015). Annual report 2015 on EIB activity in Africa, the Caribbean and Pacific, and overseas territories. Brussels: EIB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurodad. (2015). A dangerous blend? The EU’s agenda to ‘Blend’ public development finance with private finance. Brussels: Eurodad.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1996). Green paper on the relations between the european union and the ACP countries on the Eve of the 21st Century. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2000). Partnership agreement ACP-EU signed in cotonou on 23 June 2000. Revised in luxembourg on 25 June 2005—Brussels: European Commission, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2003). European community co-operation with third countries: The commission’s approach to future support for the development of the business sector. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2017). Trade—Countries and regions—West Africa. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/regions/west-africa/index_en.htm Accessed 7 Jan 2017.

  • European Parliament. (2015). Study: The new alliance for food Security and nutrition in africa. Brussels: European Parliament. Available online at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/535010/EXPO_STU(2015)535010_EN.pdf Accessed 9 Feb 2017.

  • The Financial Times. (2012, April 16). CDC is linked to Ibori fraud scandal. The Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Financial Times. (2013). Ethiopia’s leader aims to maintain tight rein on key businesses. The Financial Times, 27 May 2013. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/c0985378-c5ef-11e2-99d1-00144feab7de Accessed 30 July 2017.

  • Furtado, X., & Smith, W. (2007). Ethiopia, aid and sovereignty (GEG Working Paper 2007/28).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian. (2007). Tanzania’s water scandal: The water margin. The Guardian, 16 August 2007. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2007/aug/16/imf.internationalaidanddevelopment Accessed 30 July 2017.

  • The Guardian. (2012). Why is so much UK aid money still going to companies based in Britain? The Guardian, September 21. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/datablog/2012/sep/21/why-is-uk-aid-going-to-uk-companies Accessed 9 Feb 2017.

  • The Guardian. (2015, July 17). CDC Criticised for Pouring Funding into Gated Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauck, V., Hasse, O., & Koppensteiner, M. (2005). EC budget support: Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Maastricht: ECDPM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman, R. (2011). Budget support and democracy: A twist in the conditionality tale. Third World Quarterly, 32(4), 673–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, T., & Tibana, R. (2004). Political economy of the budget in Mozambique. Oxford: OPM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irish Aid. (2008). Good governance, aid modalities and poverty reduction: Linkages to a millennium development goals and implications for Irish Aid. Dublin: Irish Aid.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAI. (2014). DFID’s private sector development Work. London: ICAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAI. (2015). Business in development. London: ICAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Independent Evaluation Group (IEG). (2010). Poverty reduction support credits: An evaluation of world bank support. Washington: IEG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jubilee Debt Campaign and One World Action and Platform Remember and Saro-Wiwa Tax Justice Network and The Corner House and War on Want. (2010). Memorandum to secretary of state for international development: Concerns over alleged corruption in CDC-backed companies in Nigeria. London: Jubilee Debt Campaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoll, M. (2008). Budget support: A reformed approach or old wines in new skins? Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koeberle & Malesa. (2005). World Bank Conditionality: Edited Collection 2005. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langan, M. (2009). ACP-EU normative concessions from Stabex to private sector development: Why the European Union’s moralised pursuit of a “Deep” trade agenda is nothing “New” in ACP-EU relations. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 10(3), 416–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan, M. (2011a). Uganda’s flower farms and private sector development. Development and Change, 42(5), 1207–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan, M. (2011b). Private sector development as poverty and strategic discourse: PSD in the political economy of EU-Africa trade relations. Journal of Modern African Studies, 49(1), 83–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan, M. (2012). Normative power europe and the moral economy of Africa-EU ties: A conceptual reorientation of “Normative Power”. New Political Economy, 17(3), 243–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan, M. (2014). A moral economy approach to the Africa-EU ties: The case of the european investment bank. Review of International Studies, 40(3), 465–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan, M. (2015). Budget support and Africa-European union relations: Free market reform and Neo-Colonialism? European Journal of International Relations, 21(11), pp.101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, D. (2008). Dead Aid. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicita, A. (2006 February). Export-led growth, pro-poor or not? Evidence from Madagascar’s textile and apparel industry (World Bank Policy Research Briefing Paper, No. 3841). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkrumah, K. (1965). Neo-colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism (Sixth Printing—New York International Publishers, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2007). Business for development: Fostering the private sector—A development centre perspective. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pigeon, M. (2012). From fiasco to DAWASCO: Remunicipalising water systems in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. In M. Pigeon, D. McDonald, O. Hoedeman, & S. Kishimoto (Eds.), Remunicipalisation: Putting water back into public hands. Amsterdam: Trasnational Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIAO-RDC, Africa Europe Faith & Justice Network, Entraide et fraternité, GRain sos faim, UMoYa urgewald, War on Want, & World Rainforest Movement. (2016). Land conflicts and shady finances. Kinshasa: RIADO-RDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (2008). Sino-African relations and the problem of human rights. African Affairs, 107(426), 63–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TNI. (2014). Post privatisation challenges of public water in Ghana. Amsterdam: TNI.

    Google Scholar 

  • te Velde, D. W. (2006). Aid for private sector development. In S. Page (Ed.), Trade and aid: Partners or Rivals in Development Policy? (pp. 117–140). London: Cameron may.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udofia, O. E. (1984). Imperialism in Africa: A case of multinational companies. Journal of Black Studies, 14(3), 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USAID. (2008). Securing the future: A strategy for economic growth. Washington DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (2012, February 28). James Ibori: How a thief almost became Nigeria’s President. BBC News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, L., & Therkildsen, O. (2011). What drives states to support the development of productive sectors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woddis, J. (1967). An introduction to Neo-colonialism. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Mark Langan

Authors
  1. Mark Langan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Langan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Langan, M. (2018). Neo-Colonialism and Donor Interventions: Western Aid Mechanisms. In: Neo-Colonialism and the Poverty of 'Development' in Africa. Contemporary African Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58571-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation