Skip to main content

Mathematical

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multi-Objective Optimization Problems

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Mathematics ((BRIEFSMATH))

  • 1392 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, in order to evaluate the performance of the Self-adaptive Multi-objective Optimization Differential Evolution algorithm, a series of mathematical functions are considered. These test cases encompass different levels of difficulties to demonstrate the ability of the new multi-objective optimization algorithm to find the Pareto’s Curve. The results obtained by the proposed methodology demonstrate that the Pareto’s Curve can be found for all test cases. Besides, the number of objective function evaluations is reduced as compared with other evolutionary strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schaffer, J.D.: Some experiments in machine learning using vector evaluated genetic algorithms. Ph.D Dissertation. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley, Chichester (2001). ISBN 0-471-87339-X

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Lobato, F.S.: Multi-objective optimization for engineering system design. Thesis (in Portuguese), Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J.: Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization. In: Forrest, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, San Mateo, CA, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, pp. 416–423. Morgan Kauffman, San Mateo (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kursawe, F.: A variant of evolution strategies for vector optimization. In: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, pp. 193–197. Springer, Berlin (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L.: Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algoritms: empirical results. Evol. Comput. J. 8(2), 125–148 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Binh, T.T., Korn, U.: MOBES: a multiobjective evolution strategy for constrained optimization problems. In: The Third International Congress on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 176–182 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Srinivas, N., Deb, K.: Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol. Comput. 2(3), 221–248 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Osyczka, A., Kundu, S.: A new method to solve generalized multicriteria optimization problems using the simple genetic algorithm. Struct. Optim. 10(2), 94–99 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lobato, F.S., Steffen, V. (2017). Mathematical. In: Multi-Objective Optimization Problems. SpringerBriefs in Mathematics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58565-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics