Skip to main content

Using Mobile Technologies to Capture the Visitor Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Museum Experience Design

Abstract

Museums give much consideration to how visitors experience their exhibits. Mobile technologies, such as apps on mobile phones and tablets can capture the visitor experience in an automated, on-the-spot manner. Two apps were designed and used to capture visitors’ experiences of interactive exhibits at a science museum. Based on our observations, we discuss (a) the appeal of the technology, (b) the integration of this technology in the overall museum visit and (c) the processing of the collected experience data. Based on our observations, we recommend that museums and science centres critically evaluate the above-mentioned points when considering implementing mobile technologies to capture the visitor experience. Furthermore, we advise institutions to approach mobile technologies as product service systems and take into account the infrastructure that is required to make mobile technologies work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baines TS, Lightfoot HW, Evans S, Neely A, Greenough R, Peppard J, Wilson H (2007) State-of-the-art in product-service systems. In: Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 221(10):1543–1552. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM858

  • Beghetto RA (2014) The exhibit as planned versus the exhibit as experienced. Curator Mus J 57(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffee K (2007) Audience research and the museum experience as social practice. Mus Manag Curatorship 22(4):377–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770701757732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci EL, Ryan RM (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq 11(4):227–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmet PM, Hekkert P (2007) Framework of product experience. Int J Des 1(1):57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl M (2004) The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Hum Comput Interact 19(4):319–349. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl M (2010) Experience design: technology for all the right reasons. Morgan and Claypool. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00261ED1V01Y201003HCI008

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert P, Schifferstein HNJ (2008) Introducing Product Experience. In: Schifferstein H, Hekkert P (eds) Product experience. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Intille SS, Rondoni J, Kukla C, Ancona I, Bao L (2003) A context-aware experience sampling tool. In: CHI’03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, pp 972–973

    Google Scholar 

  • Law EL-C, Roto V, Vermeeren APOS, Kort J, Hassenzahl M (2009) Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In Proceedings of CHI 2009, the 27th annual CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Erkin Z, de Ridder H, Vermeeren A (2013) A field study on real-time self-reported emotions in crowds. In: Proceedings of the ICT open. Eindhoven, The Netherlands, pp 80–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Locher P, Overbeeke K, Wensveen S (2010) Aesthetic interaction: a framework. Des Issues 26(2):70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nees MA, Walker BN (2009) Auditory interfaces and sonification. In: Stephanidis C (ed) The universal access handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp 507–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowacki MM (2005) Evaluating a museum as a tourist product using the servqual method. Mus Manag Curatorship 20(3):235–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang B, Lee L (2008) Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found Trends Inf Retr 2(1–2):1–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekarik AJ, Schreiber JB, Hanemann N, Richmond K, Mogel B (2014) IPOP: A theory of experience preference. Curator Mus J 57(1):5–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roto V, Vermeeren APOS, Law EL-C, Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila K, Obrist M (2015) User experience evaluation; which method to choose (Notes of a course given at the conferences SAICSIT 2010, NordiCHI 2010, INTERACT 2011, CHI 2012 and CHI 2013). Accessed from: http://www.allaboutux.org/files/UX-evaluation-methods-CourseMaterial.pdf

  • Sheldon KM, Elliot AJ, Kim Y, Kasser T (2001) What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. J Pers Soc Psychol 80(2):325–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snavely N, Seitz SM, Szeliski R (2008) Modeling the world from internet photo collections. Int J Comput Vis 80(2):189–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StĂĄhl A, Höök K, Svensson M, Taylor AS, Combetto M (2009) Experiencing the affective diary. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 13(5):365–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterry P, Beaumont E (2006) Methods for studying family visitors in art museums: a cross-disciplinary review of current research. Mus Manag Curatorship. 21 (3):222–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer J (1992) Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J Commun 42(4):73–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeeren APOS, Law E, Roto V, Obrist M, Hoonhout J, Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila K (2010) User experience evaluation methods: current state and development needs. In: Proceedings of the 6th nordic conference on human-computer interaction: extending boundaries. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 521–530

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was part of Science Live, the innovative research programme of NEMO Science Museum that enables scientists to carry out real, publishable, peer-reviewed research using NEMO visitors as volunteers. This study has further been made possible by the Dutch Creative Industries and Scientific Program (CRISP). The authors would further like to thank: Alt-N, Shapers and KlevR Audio Design in producing the apps, and many thanks go to the Industrial Design students that have helped in conducting both experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnold P. O. S. Vermeeren .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rozendaal, M.C., Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., Issidorides, D.C. (2018). Using Mobile Technologies to Capture the Visitor Experience. In: Vermeeren, A., Calvi, L., Sabiescu, A. (eds) Museum Experience Design. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58550-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58550-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58549-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58550-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics