Abstract
This chapter analyzes the relationship between marketing context and branding content of six private universities in Chile and Mexico. Conditions for placement and promotion of HE and institutional efforts to design a marketing identity vary according to the degree of privatization, diversification, and segmentation of higher education systems. Therefore, while in Mexico branding content is embedded in a low regulated framework for private sector, Chilean HEIs branding rests in a deeply institutionalized market environment. However, through a web content analysis, we identify three similar branding orientations in private universities: strengthening reputation, building reputation, and catching-all. Branding targets high, middle or low-income audiences by highlighting symbolic values, economic messages, and institutional features to influence audience’s perceptions and mobilize economic decisions of current and potential users/customers.
We are thankful for the support of the Internationalization and Academic and Scientific Mobility Network (RIMAC), the CONACYT Networks Project, no. 260402, and the Program of Post-Doctoral Scholarships of the Coordinating Committee of Humanities of the UNAM. Elena Torres, Research Assistant at the Department for Educational Research of the Research and Advanced Studies Center (DIE-CINVESTAV) and Fanny Urrego, Professor at the School of Psychology in the Department of Health Sciences at Universidad Panamericana, collaborated in the gathering and processing of data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Business administration programs were taken as a reference, under the supposition that all private institutions offer some sort of program in this area.
- 2.
With a number of courses equivalent to 30 h weekly.
References
Álvarez-Mendiola, G. (2011). El fin de la bonanza. La educación superior privada en México en la primera década del siglo XXI. Reencuentro, 60, 10–29. Retrieved from http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=34017127002.
Brunner, J. J. (2009). Mercados, instituciones y políticas en la educación superior chilena. Temas, 57, 52–59. Retrieved from http://temas.cult.cu/articulo_academico/mercados-instituciones-y-politicas-en-la-educacion-superior-chilena/.
Brunner, J. J. & Ferrada R. (eds.) (2011). Santiago de Chile, Centro Interuniversitario de Desarrollo (CINDA). Retrived from www.universia.net/nosotros/files/Educacion_Superior.pdf.
Chapleo, C. (2010). What defines “successful” university brands? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(2), 169–183. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513551011022519.
CEPPE (Centro de Estudios de Políticas y Prácticas en Educación, Universidad Católica); CIAE (Centro de Investigación Avanzada en Educación, Universidad de Chile)&FEUAH (Facultad de EducaciónUniversidad Alberto Hurtado). (2013). Universidades Chilenas: Institucionalidad y Regulación. Ciclo de Diálogos sobre el Futuro de la Educación Chilena. Retrieved from http://www.cide.cl/documentos/Dialogos_CEPPE_UAH_Ues_chilenas.pdf.
De Vries, W. & Álvarez, G. (2005). Acerca de las políticas, la política y otras complicaciones en la educación superior mexicana. Revista de la Educación Superior, XXXIV-2(134), 81–105. Retrieved from http://publicaciones.anuies.mx/pdfs/revista/Revista134_S4A4ES.pdf.
González-Ledesma, M. A. (2015). The Changing Role of Governance of Latin American Higher Education (Unpublished doctoral thesis). SUM-Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Florence, Italy.
Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace: A systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316–338.
Mampaey, J., Huisman, J. & Seeber, M. (2015). Branding of Flemish higher education institutions: a strategic balance perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 6(34), 1178–1191. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1024634.
Neave, G. (1979). Academic drift: some views from Europe. Studies in Higher Education, 4(2), 143–159. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075077912331376927.
Servicio Nacional del Consumidor (SERNAC). (2015). Informe: Publicidad de Instituciones de Educación Superior. Retrieved from http://www.sernac.cl/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Reporte-de-Publicidad.pdf.
Williams, R. L., Jr., & Maktoba, O. (2014). How branding process activities impact brand equity within Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 24(1), 1–10.
Wörner, C.-H., Santander, P., & Arancibia, L. (2016). La irrupción del marketing como estrategia para capturar estudiantes: publicidad y avisaje en la educación superior chilena. REIRE, Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 9(1), 29–46.
van Vught, F. (2008). Mission diversity and reputation in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 21, 151–174. Retrieved from http://doc.utwente.nl/73249/1/Vught08mission.pdf.
Zapata, G. & Tejeda, I. (2016). Publicidad engañosa en educación superior: definiciones, regulaciones y una revisión de la publicidad en prensa escrita. Calidad en la Educación Superior, 44, 197–242. Retrieved from www.scielo.cl/pdf/caledu/n44/art08.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Álvarez-Mendiola, G., González-Ledesma, M.A. (2018). Marketing Context and Branding Content of Private Universities in Chile and Mexico. In: Papadimitriou, A. (eds) Competition in Higher Education Branding and Marketing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58527-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58527-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58526-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58527-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)