Advertisement

Branding by Proxy? How Hubs Market (or not) Higher Education Systems Globally: The Example of Qatar

  • Leon Cremonini
  • John Taylor
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter proposes a framework to understand if and how hubs contribute to stronger positioning of higher education system in global competition, and uses the case of Qatar to draw conclusions. Increasingly, governments around the world invest in so-called “education hubs,” which host excellent tertiary providers. Hubs show how, on a global level, new forms of competition between higher education systems are evolving. By being home to top universities, hubs are believed to be both a country’s “branding tool” and a means for developing internal capacity. The analysis suggests that a hub does not necessarily strengthen the national position but may actually reinforce existing inequalities in perceived prestige between systems.

Keywords

Competition Higher education hub Markrtization Branding Positioning higher education system 

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (2010). Why branch campuses may be unsustainable. International Higher Education, 58, 2–3.Google Scholar
  2. Althani, M. A. J. (2013). The Arab spring and the Gulf states: Time to embrace change. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  3. Augustine, C. A., & Krop, C. (2008). Aligning post-secondary educational choices to societal needs: A new scholarship system for Qatar. Technical report. Santa Monica: RAND. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2008/RAND_TR478.pdf.
  4. Blackmore, P. (2016). Prestige in academic life: Excellence and exclusion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the market place. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bollag, B. (2016). Importing higher education: A Qatari experiment. Al Fanar Media. Retrieved from http://www.al-fanarmedia.org/2016/07/importing-higher-education-a-qatari-experiment/.
  7. Brewer, D., Gates, S., & Goldman, C. A. (2002). In pursuit of prestige: Strategy and competition in U.S. higher education. New Brunswick: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
  8. Clifford, M. (2015). Assessing the feasibility of international branch campuses. Factors universities considers when establishing campuses abroad. RAND Graduate School (PRGS) dissertation. Santa Monica: RAND. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD354.html.
  9. Clifford, M., & Kinser, K. (2016). How much autonomy do branch campuses really have? International Higher Education, 87, 7–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cremonini, L. & Antonowicz, D. (2009). In the eye of the beholder? conceptualizing academic attraction in the global higher education market. European Education, 41(2), 52–74. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  11. Dessoff, A. (2012). Asia’s burgeoning higher education hubs. International Educator. Retrieved from http://www.nafsa.org/_/file/_/ie_julaug12_asia.pdf.
  12. Doha News Team. (2012, May 17). Comparisons between education city, Qatar University spark controversy. Doha News. Retrieved from http://dohanews.co/comparisons-between-education-city-qatar-university/.
  13. De Boer, H., File, J., Huisman, J., Seeber, M., Vukasovic, M., & Westerheijden, D. F. (Eds.). (2017). Policy analysis of structural reforms in higher education. Processes and Outcomes. Palgrave studies in global higher education, Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Schofer, E. (2003). Science in the modern world polity: Institutionalization and globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  16. General Secretariat for Development Planning. (2008). Qatar national vision 2030. Doha: Qatar. Retrieved from http://www.qu.edu.qa/pharmacy/components/upcoming_events_material/Qatar_National_Vision_2030.pdf.
  17. Gonzalez, G., Karoly, L. A., Constant, L., Salem H., & Goldman C. A. (2008). Facing human capital challenges of the 21st century. Education and labor market initiatives in Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. Santa Monica: RAND. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2008/RAND_MG786.pdf.
  18. Hodges, L. (2013a, November 15). Ambitious 10-year reforms raise standards at Qatar University. University World News. Retrieved from http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20131112153310725.
  19. Hodges, L. (2013b, December 6). First graduate university boosts higher education hub. University World News. Retrieved from http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20131203090948820.
  20. Ibnouf, A., Dou, L., & Knight, J. (2014). The evolution of Qatar as and education hub: Moving to a knowledge-based economy. In J. Knight (Ed.), International education hubs student, talent, knowledge-innovation models (pp. 43–62). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Jakobi, A. P. (2007). The knowledge society and global dynamics in education politics. European Educational Research Journal, 6(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kerr, S. (2013, October 20). Doha’s education city is a boost for locals overseas institutions expand outreach programs. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/b2fff52c-1711-11e3-9ec2-00144feabdc0.
  23. Khatri, S. S., & Kovessy, P. (2015, December 7). Early plans for Qatar’s education city rejected, Sheikha Moza says. Doha News, Retrieved from http://dohanews.co/early-plans-for-qatars-education-city-rejected-sheikha-moza-says/.
  24. Knight, J. (2011). Education hubs: A fad, a brand, an innovation? Journal of Studies in International Education, 15, 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knight, J. (Ed.). (2014). International education hubs. Student, talent, knowledge-innovation models. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Knight, J. (2015). Financing education hubs: Who invests? International Higher Education., 79, 4–5.Google Scholar
  27. Knight, J., & Lee, J. (2014). An analytical framework for education hubs. In J. Knight (Ed.), International education hubs student, talent, knowledge-innovation models (pp. 29–42). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Kolster, R. (2010). Academic attractiveness of countries to students; Explaining and measuring a countries’ academic X factor. Master thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.Google Scholar
  29. Kolster, R. (2014). Academic attractiveness of countries; A possible benchmark strategy applied to the Netherlands. European Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 118–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kovessy, P. (2014, April 7). HBKU amends university scholarship criteria to reward ‘loyalty’ to Qatar. Doha News. Retrieved from https://dohanews.co/hbku-amends-university-scholarship-criteria-reward-loyalty-qatar/.
  31. McMahon, M. (1992). Higher education in a world market. Higher Education, 24(4), 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., Frank, D. J., & Schofer, E. (2006). Higher education as an institution. CDDRL working papers. Retrieved from https://cddrl.fsi.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/Meyer_No_57.pdf.
  33. Ministry of Education and Higher Education. (2011). Education and training sector strategy 2011–2016. Executive summary. Doha: Qatar. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.qa/En/about/Documents/Stratgy2012E.pdf.
  34. Mohrman, K., Ma, W., & Baker, D. (2007). The emerging global model of the research university. In P. G. Altbach & P. M. Peterson (Eds.), Higher education in the new century: Global challenges and innovative idea. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Mohrman, K., Ma, W., & Baker, D. (2008). The research university in transition: The emerging global model. Higher Education Policy, 21, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moini, J., Bikson, T. K., Neu, C. R., DeSisto, L., Al Hamadi, M., & Al Thani., S. J. (2009). The reform of Qatar university. Santa Monica: RAND. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG796.pdf.
  37. Mok, K. H. (2008). Singapore’s global education hub ambitions: University governance change and transnational higher education. International Journal of Education Management, 22, 527–546.Google Scholar
  38. Pollock, M. (2007). Qatar as a model for educational reform in the Arabian Gulf. World Education News and Reviews. Retrieved from http://wenr.wes.org/2007/05/wenr-may-2007-qatar-as-a-model-for-educational-reform-in-the-arabian-gulf.
  39. Roberts, D. B. (2015). Qatar coming to grips with new realities of global energy markets. Washington, DC: The Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington. Retrieved from http://www.agsiw.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Roberts_Qatar-LNG_2.pdf.
  40. Rogers, E. M. (2003). The diffusion of innovations. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rubin, A. (2012, July 31). Higher education reform in the Arab world: The model of Qatar. Retrieved from http://www.mei.edu/content/higher-education-reform-arab-world-model-qatar.
  42. Sakimoto, R., & Chapman, D. W. (Eds.). (2011). Cross-border partnerships in higher education: Strategies and issues. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Scott, V. (2013, November 26). Qatar university president’s comments spark angry response. Doha News. Retrieved from http://dohanews.co/qatar-university-presidents-comments-spark-angry-response/.
  44. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Stasz, C., Eide, E. R., Martorell, P., Constant, L., Goldman, C. A., Moini, J. S., Nadareishvili, V., & Salem, H. (2007). Post-secondary education in Qatar. Employer demand, student choice and options for policy. Santa Monica: RAND. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG644.html.
  46. Stiglitz, J. E. (2007). Making globalization work. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  47. UNESCO. (2008). EFA global monitoring report 2009. Overcoming inequality: Why governance matters. UNESCO: Paris. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0017/001776/177683e.pdf.
  48. UNESCO. (2016). Global education monitoring report 2016. Education for people and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all. UNESCO: Paris. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002457/245752e.pdf.
  49. Wallerstein, I. (1974). The rise and future demise of the world capitalist system: Concepts for comparative analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(4), 387–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zucker, L. (1983). Organizations as institutions. Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 1–47). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leon Cremonini
    • 1
  • John Taylor
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS)University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department: Educational ResearchLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations