Advertisement

Thin-Walled Rods with Semi-Opened Profiles

  • Vladimir Kobelev
Chapter

Abstract

A thin-walled beam is an extraordinary type of the torsion spring. This type of torsion spring serves as the cross-connection member in several industrial and automotive structures. The thin-walled beam is an elongated elastic structural element whose distinctive geometric dimensions are all of different orders of magnitude. Thin-walled beams can be classified by their geometric features. Two classes of thin-walled beam cross-sections are notable, namely thin-walled beams with the open cross-section and thin-walled beams with the closed cross-section (Vlasov 1961; Timoshenko 1945; Flügge and Marguerre 1950). In the Chap.  10 an intermediate class of thin-walled beam cross-sections is studied. The cross-section of the beam is closed, but the shape of cross-section is elongated and curved. The walls, which form the cross-section, are nearly equidistant. The Saint-Venant free torsion behavior of the beam is similar to the behavior of closed cross-section beams. However, the total warping function of the semi-opened cross-section is similar to the warping function of open cross-section beam.

Generally speaking, particular difference between thin-walled rods is in the presence of warping of cross-section and the corresponding force factor, the bi-moment. It is shown, that the thin-walled beams with closed profiles behave differently, depending on the form of the cross-section. There exist two types of the thin-walled beams with closed profiles. The first type of thin-walled beams possesses closed profiles with nearly equal diameters in all directions, so that there is no distinguished direction. The torsion of such closed beams is predominantly of Saint-Venant type. The effect of bi-moment on the twist behavior of the thin-walled beams of the first type is in most cases negligible in comparison to the Saint-Venant torsion. The second type of thin-walled beams embraces closed profiles formed by equidistant walls, elongated profiles and star-like profiles. The contribution of Saint-Venant torsion stiffness of beams with this type of profile is of the same order of magnitude, as the contribution of sectorial stiffness and the effect of bi-moment should be accounted.

References

  1. Bazant, Z.P., Cedolin, L.: Stability of Structures. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Boresi, A.P., Schmidt, R.J.: Advance Mechanics of Materials, 6th edn. Wiley, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  3. Cherniy, V.P.: Effect of curved bar properties on bending of curved pipes. Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech. (2001) doi: 10.1115/1.1357518, 68Google Scholar
  4. Chilver, A.H. (ed.): Thin-Walled Structures. Wiley, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  5. Clark, R.A., Reissner, E.: Bending of Curved Tubes, Advances in Applied Mechanics, Vol. II, pp. 93–122. Academic Press, San Diego (1951)Google Scholar
  6. Flügge, W., Marguerre, K.: Wölbkräfte in dünnwandigen Profilstäben. Ing. Arch. 18, 23–38 (1950)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Graße, W.: Wölbkrafttorsion dünnwandiger prismatischer Stäbe beliebigen Querschnitts. Ing. Arch. 24, 330–338 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heilig, R.: Beitrag zur Theorie der Kastenträger beliebiger Querschnittsform. Der Stahlbau. 30, 333–349 (1961)Google Scholar
  9. ISO: International organization for standardization, “Road vehicles – Vehicle dynamics and road-holding ability – Vocabulary”. ISO Standard 8855, Rev. (2010)Google Scholar
  10. Karman, T.: Über die Formänderung dünnwandiger Rohre, insbesondere federnder Ausgleichrohre. Z. Ver. Deut. Ing. 55, 1889–1895 (1911)Google Scholar
  11. Kobelev, V.: Thin-walled rods with semiopened profiles. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 80, (2013). doi: 10.1115/1.4006935
  12. Kobelev, V.V., Larichev, A.D.: Model of thin-walled anisotropic rods. Mech. Compos. Mater. 24, 97–104 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kollar, L.P., Pluzsik, A.: Analysis of thin-walled composite beams with arbitrary layup. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 21, 1423 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laudiero, F., Savoia, M.: Shear strain effects in flexure and torsion of thin-walled beams with open or closed cross-section. J. Thin-Walled Struct. 10, 87–119 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Librescu, L., Song, O.: Thin-Walled Composite Beams, Theory and Application. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Prokic, A.: Stiffness method of thin-walled beams with closed cross-section. Comput. Struct. 81, 39–51 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reissner, E.: Analysis of shear lag in box beams by the principle of minimum potential energy. Q. Appl. Math. 4, 268–278 (1946)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. SAE: International surface vehicle recommended practice, “Vehicle Dynamics Terminology”. SAE Standard J670, Rev. 2008-01-24 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. Salmon, C.G., Johnson, J.E.: Steel Structures, 4th edn. HarperCollins College Publishers, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  20. Siev, A.: Torsion in closed sections. Eng. J. AISC. 3(1), 46–54 (1966)Google Scholar
  21. Slivker, V.: Mechanics of Structural Elements, Theory and Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Tamberg, K.G., Mikluchin, P.T.: Torsional phenomena analysis and concrete structure design, analysis of structural systems for torsion, SP-35. American Concrete Institute, 1–102 (1973)Google Scholar
  23. Timoshenko, S.: Theory of bending, torsion, and buckling of thin-walled members of open cross-section. J. Franklin Inst. 239, 201–219, 249–268, 343–361 (1945)Google Scholar
  24. Timoshenko, S., Gere, J.M.: Theory of Elastic Stability. McGraw-Hill, New York (1961)Google Scholar
  25. Ventsel, E., Krauthammer, T.: Thin Plates and Shells, Theory, Analysis, and Applications. Marcel Dekker AG, Basel (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vlasov, V.Z.: Thin-Walled Elastic Beams, Office of Technical Services, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington 25, DC, TT-61–11400 (1961)Google Scholar
  27. Wang, Q.: Effect of shear lag on buckling of thin-walled members with any cross-section. Commun. Num. Methods Eng. 15, 263–272 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Whatham, J.F.: Thin shell equations for circular pipe bends. Nucl. Eng. Des. 65, 77 (1981a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Whatham, J.F.: Thin Shell analysis of non-circular pipe bends. Nucl. Eng. Des. 67, 287–296 (1981b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir Kobelev
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of SiegenSiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations