Advertisement

Failure Mechanisms and Methods to Estimate Material Resistance to Failure

  • Dallas N. LittleEmail author
  • David H. Allen
  • Amit Bhasin
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses the most common forms of failure in asphalt mixtures, i.e., rutting, fatigue cracking, transverse cracking, moisture-induced damage, bleeding or flushing, and the influence of aging on these distresses. The chapter discusses the mechanism of failure for each one of these distresses. Two different approaches to measure the resistance of mixtures to any of these distresses are discussed: (i) the measurement of empirical performance indicators, and (ii) the measurement of fundamental material properties that can be combined with numerical models to measure the performance of the mixture. Examples based on each of the above two approaches for each distress type (rutting, fatigue cracking, low-temperature cracking, and moisture damage) are discussed. These discussions also provide a context for the mechanistic tools that are discussed in Part 2 of this book.

Keywords

Failure mechanisms Rutting Fatigue cracking Transverse cracking Bleeding Moisture-induced damage Complex modulus Simplistic or torture tests Mechanistic methods to evaluate damage Wohler curve Self-healing Surface energy 

References

  1. Ahmed, S., et al. (2013). Cracking resistance of thin-bonded overlays using fracture tests, numerical simulations and early field performance. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16(6), 540–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2005). Standard method of test for determining dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt concrete mixtures, TP62 AASHTO.Google Scholar
  3. Arambula, E., Masad, E., & Martin, A. E. (2007). Influence of air void distribution on the moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixes. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19(8), 655–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arega, Z. A., Bhasin, A., & De Kesel, T. (2013). Influence of extended aging on the properties of asphalt composites produced using hot and warm mix methods. Construction and Building Materials, 44, 168–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazin, P., & Saunier, J. (1967, January). Deformability, fatigue and healing properties of asphalt mixes. In Intl Conf Struct Design Asphalt Pvmts.Google Scholar
  6. Bhasin, A., et al. (2009). Quantitative comparison of energy methods to characterize fatigue in asphalt materials. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering (ASCE), 21(2), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhasin, A., Button, J., & Chowdhury, A. (2003). Evaluation of simple performance tests on HMA mixtures from the South Central USA. TX: College Station.Google Scholar
  8. Bhasin, A., & Motamed, A. (2011). Analytical models to characterise crack growth in asphaltic materials and healing in asphalt binders. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 12(4), 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhasin, A., Little, D. N., Bommavaram, R., & Vasconcelos, K. (2008). A framework to quantify the effect of healing in bituminous materials using material properties. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 9(sup1), 219–242.Google Scholar
  10. Broek, D. (1982). Elementaty engineering fracture mechanics.Google Scholar
  11. Caro, S., et al. (2008). Moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures, Part 1: Mechanisms. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 9(2), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caro, S., et al. (2010). Coupled micromechanical model of moisture-induced damage in asphalt mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering (ASCE), 22(4), 380–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, B., et al. (1997). Potholes and politics: How congress can fix your roads.Google Scholar
  14. Copeland, A.R. (2007). Influence of moisture on bond strength of asphalt-aggregate systems.Google Scholar
  15. Daniel, J. S., & Kim, Y. R. (2002). Development of a simplified fatigue test and analysis procedure using a viscoelastic, continuum damage model (with discussion). Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 71. Google Scholar
  16. Dave, E. V., & Buttlar, W. G. (2010). Thermal reflective cracking of asphalt concrete overlays. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 11(6), 477–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffith, A. A. (1921). The phenomenon of rupture and flow in solids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, A221, 163–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hajj, R., Bhasin, A. (2017). The search for a measure of fatigue cracking in asphalt binders-a review of different approaches. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–15.Google Scholar
  19. Hefer, A., Little, D. N., & Lytton, R. L. (2005). A synthesis of theories and mechanisms of bitumen-aggregate adhesion including recent advances in quantifying the effects of water. Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 74, 139–196.Google Scholar
  20. Hu, J., Qian, Z., Liu, Y., & Zhang, M. (2015). High-temperature failure in asphalt mixtures using micro-structural investigation and image analysis, 84, 136–145.Google Scholar
  21. Karki, P., Li, R., & Bhasin, A. (2015). Quantifying overall damage and healing behavior of asphalt materials using continuum damage approach. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16(4), 350–362.Google Scholar
  22. Karki, P., Bhasin, A., & Underwood, B. S. (2016). Fatigue Performance Prediction of Asphalt Composites Subjected to Cyclic Loading with Intermittent Rest Periods. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2576), 72–82.Google Scholar
  23. Kim, Y., et al. (2004). Dynamic modulus testing of asphalt concrete in indirect tension mode. Transportation Research Record, 1891(1), 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kringos, N. (2007). Modeling of combined physical-mechanical moisture induced damage in asphaltic mixes.Google Scholar
  25. Kringos, N., Scarpas, A., & De Bondt, A. (2008). Determination of moisture susceptibility of mastic-stone bond strength and comparison to thermodynamical properties. Journal of the association of asphalt paving technologists 77.Google Scholar
  26. Kringos, N., Schmets, A., Scarpas, A., & Pauli, T. (2011). Towards an understanding of the self-healing capacity of asphaltic mixtures. Heron, 56(1/2), 45–74.Google Scholar
  27. Lee, H. J., & Kim, Y. R. (1998). Viscoelastic constitutive model for asphalt concrete under cyclic loading. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 124(1), 32–40.Google Scholar
  28. Li, R., et al. (2015). Rheological and low temperature properties of asphalt composites containing rock asphalts. Construction and Building Materials, 90, 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malvern, L. E. (1969). Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium. New Jersey: Princeton Hall.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Masad, E., Castelblanco, A., & Birgisson, B. (2006). Effects of Air Void Size Distribution, Pore Pressure, and Bond Energy on Moisture Damage. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 34(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  31. McGennis, R.B., Anderson, R.M., Kennedy, T.W., & Solaimanian, M. (1994). Background of Superpave Asphalt Mixture Design and Analysis, Report Number FHWA-SA-95-003, Performing Organization: Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY, Sponsor: Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  32. Mohseni, A. (1998). LTPP seasonal asphalt concrete (AC) pavement temperature models. VA: McLean.Google Scholar
  33. Morland, L. W., & Lee, E. H. (1960). Stress analysis for linear viscoelastic materials with temperature variation. Transactions of The Society of Rheology (1957–1977), 4(1), 233–263. http://scitation.aip.org/content/sor/journal/tsor/4/1/10.1122/1.548856.
  34. Muki, R., & Sternberg, E. (1961). On transient thermal stresses in viscoelastic materials with temperature-dependent properties. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 28(2), 193–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3641651.
  35. Ozer, H., Al-Qadi, I. L., Lambros, J., El-Khatib, A., Singhvi, P., & Doll, B. (2016). Development of the fracture-based flexibility index for asphalt concrete cracking potential using modified semi-circle bending test parameters. Construction and Building Materials, 115, 390–401.Google Scholar
  36. Paris, P. C., & Erdogan, F. (1963). A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. Journal of Basic Engineering, 85, 528–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Park, S. W., Kim, Y. R., & Schapery, R. A. (1996). A viscoelastic continuum damage model and its application to uniaxial behavior of asphalt concrete. Mechanics of Materials, 24(4), 241–255.Google Scholar
  38. Roque, R., et al. (2004). Development and field evaluation of energy-based criteria for top-down cracking performance of hot mix asphalt. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologist, 73, 229–260.Google Scholar
  39. Schapery, R. A. (1981). On viscoelastic deformation and failure behavior of composite materials with distributed flaws. 1981 advances in aerospace structures and materials, 5–20.Google Scholar
  40. Schapery, R. A. (1984). Correspondence principles and a generaiized J integral for large deformation and fracture analysis of viscoelastic media. International Journal of Fracture, 25, 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schwartz, C. W., & Kaloush, K. E. (2009). Permanent deformation assessment for asphalt concrete pavement and mixture design. In Y. Richard Kim (Ed.), Modeling of asphalt concrete, (pp. 317–351). New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.Google Scholar
  42. Sultana, S., & Bhasin, A. (2014). Effect of chemical composition on rheology and mechanical properties of asphalt binder. Construction and Building Materials, 72, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Underwood, B. S., Kim, Y. R., & Guddati, M. N. (2010). Improved calculation method of damage parameter in viscoelastic continuum damage model. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 11(6), 459–476.Google Scholar
  44. Wang, H., & Al-Qadi, I. (2009). Combined effect of moving wheel loading and three-dimensional contact stresses on perpetual pavement responses. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2095), 53–61.Google Scholar
  45. Witczak, M., Schwartz, C. & Von Quintus, H. (2001). NCHRP Project 9-19: Superpave support and performance models management. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dallas N. Little
    • 1
    Email author
  • David H. Allen
    • 1
  • Amit Bhasin
    • 2
  1. 1.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.The University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations