Abstract
The main objective of this paper is to propose an approach to resolve product configuration conflicts based on the previously developed framework for product component modelling in terms of mass customization and original matrix method, by which it is possible to determine the number and structural designs of all relevant product configurations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aldanondo M, Vareilles E (2008) Configuration for mass customization: how to extend product configuration towards requirements and process configuration. J Intell Manuf 19:521–535
Dima IC, Grabara J, Modrak V et al (2010) Using the expert systems in the operational management of production. In 11th WSEAS International Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Business and Economics (MCBE’10)-Published by WSEAS Press
Du X, Tseng MM (1999) Characterizing customer value for product customization, Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, September 1999, Las Vegas, Nevada
Felfernig A, Friedrich G, Jannach D (2002) Conceptual modeling for configuration of mass-customizable products. Artif Intell Eng 15:165–176
Fleischanderl G, Friedrich G, Haselböck A et al (1998) Configuring large systems using generative constraint satisfaction. IEEE Intell Syst 13:59–68
Frutos JD, Santos ER, Borenstein D (2004) Decision support system for product configuration in mass customization environments. Concurrent Eng Res A 12:131–144
Gecevska V, Chiabert P, Anisic Z et al (2010) Product lifecycle management through innovative and competitive business environment. Int J Ing Eng Manag Sci 3:323–336
Giovannini A, Aubry A, Panetto H et al (2013) Mass customisation in sustainable networked enterprises. Proceedings of the 14th IFIP Working Conference on Virtual Entreprise, vol 408, pp 657–666
Inakoshi H, Okamoto S, Ohta Y et al (2001) Effective decision support for product configuration by using cbr. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Case—Based Reasoning (ICCBR), Vancouver, Canada
Krus P (2015) Design space configuration for minimizing design information entropy. In: Proceedings of the ICoRD’15—Research into Design Across Boundaries: Theory, Research Methodology, Aesthetics, Human Factors and Education. Springer India; 2015. pp 51–60
Li B, Chen L, Huang Z et al (2006) Product configuration optimization using a multiobjective genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 30:20–29
Lin J, Fox MS, Bilgic T (1996) A requirement ontology for engineering design. Concurrent Eng-Res A 4:279–291
Liu Q, Xu Y, Xie J et al (2010) Research on the solution of product configuration based on constraint satisfaction problem. Proceedings of 2nd Pacific-Asia Conference on Circuits, Communications and System, pp 39–42, August 2010, Beijing, China
Matt DT (2010) Axiomatic design of agile manufacturing systems. In: Aized T (ed) Future manufacturing systems. Rijeka, InTech, pp 179–194
Modrak V, Bednar S (2015) Using axiomatic design and entropy to measure complexity in mass customization. Procedia CIRP 34:87–92
Modrak V, Marton D, Bednar S (2014) The impact of customized variety on configuration complexity of assembly process. Appl Mech Mater 474:135–140
Modrak V, Marton D, Bednar S (2015) The influence of mass customization strategy on configuration complexity of assembly systems. Procedia CIRP 33:539–544
Modrak V, Marton D, Kulpa W (2012) Unraveling Complexity in Assembly Supply Chain Networks. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Symposium on Logistics and Industrial Informatics, pp 151–155, September, 2012, Smolenice, Slovakia
Ong SK, Lin Q, Nee AYC (2006) Web-based configuration design system for product customization. Int J Prod Res 44:351–382
Stumptner M, Friedrich GE, Haselbock A (1998) Generative constraint based configuration of large technical systems. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 12:307–320
Wang L, Wee KN, Song B (2011a) Extended DCSP approach on product configuration with cost estimation. Concurrent Eng Res A 19:123–138
Wang Y, Han G, Ge J et al (2011b) Research on design method of demand-driven product configuration for mass customization. Int J Adv Manuf Syst 10:117–125
Xie H, Henderson P, Kernahan M (2005) Modelling and solving engineering product configuration problems by constraint satisfaction. Int J Prod Res 43:4455–4469
Yang D, Dong M (2012) A constraint satisfaction approach to resolving product configuration conflicts. Adv Eng Inform 26:592–602
Yang D, Miao R, Wu HW et al (2009) Product configuration knowledge modeling using ontology web language. Expert Syst Appl 36:4399–4411
Acknowledgements
This paper has been supported by KEGA project no. 078TUKE-4/2015 granted by the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Modrak, V., Bednar, S., Soltysova, Z. (2018). Resolving Product Configuration Conflicts. In: Viles, E., Ormazábal, M., Lleó, A. (eds) Closing the Gap Between Practice and Research in Industrial Engineering. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58409-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58409-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58408-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58409-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)