Abstract
This chapter discusses the possibilities of using biomass for several industrial applications, including biopolymers, bio-based materials and biofuel. It also covers the potential conflict between materials/energy and food, cascading concept of biomass utilization and the use of residues. Finally, it discusses the state of art of biomass and agriwastes utilization in Brazil, going from chemical feedstock, biofuels to bio-based materials, at macro, micro and nanoscales.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anastas, P. T., & Warner, J. C. (1998). Green chemistry: Theory and practice (p. 30). New York: Oxford University Press.
CEPI – Confederation of Paper Industries. (2012). Biobased for growth a public-private partnership on biobased industries (p. 43).
Cherian, B. M., De Oliveira, G. M., Costa, L. M. M., Souza, S. F., & Leao, A. L. (2012). Protein-based polymer nanocomposite for regenerative medicine. In J. J. Maya & S. Thomas (Org.), Natural polymers composites (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 255–293). Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Czernik, S., & Bridgwater, A. V. (2004). Overview of applications of biomass fast pyrolysis oil. Energy Fuels, 18, 590–598.
Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (Brasil). (2016). Balanço Energético Nacional 2015: Ano Base 2014 (p. 292). Rio de Janeiro: Empresa de Pesquisa Energética. Brazilian Energy Balance 2016 Year 2015, 2016.
Essel, R., Breitmayer, E., Carus, M., Fehrenbach, H., Von Geibler, J., Bienge, K., & Baur, F. (2014). Discussion paper defining cascading use of biomass. R&D-project “Increasing resource efficiency by cascading use of biomass – from theory to practice”. Huerth, 14 March 2014.
Farag, I. H., Laclair, C. E., & Barrett, C. J. (2002). Technical, environmental and economic feasibility of bio-oil in New-Hampshire’s north country. UNH Bio-oil Team Report (Final Report submitted to NH IRC), August 2002.
Hassuani, S., Leal, J. M. R. L. V., & Macedo, I. C. (2005). Biomass power generation sugar cane bagasse and trash (1st ed., 217 p.). Brazil: PNUD – Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento CTC – Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira Piracicaba.
Kosmol, J., Kanthak, J., Herrmann, F., Golde, M., Alsleben, C., Penn-Bressel, G., Schnitz, S., & Gromke, U. (2012). Glossar zum Ressourcenschutz. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt.
Langeveld, H., Sanders, J., & Meeusen, M. (2010). The biobased economy: Biofuels, materials, and chemicals in the post-oil era. London: Earthscan.
Leao, A. L., Cherian, B. M., Narine, S., Sain, M., Souza, S. F., & Thomas, S. (2015). Applications for nanocellulose in polyolefins-based composites. In S. Mohanty, S. K. Nayak, B. S. Kaith, & S. Kalia (Org.), Polymer nanocomposites based on inorganic and organic nanomaterials (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 215–228). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Mialon, L., Vanderhenst, R., Pemba, A. G., & Miller, S. A. (2011). Polyalkylenehydroxybenzoates (PAHBs): Biorenewable aromatic/aliphatic polyesters from lignin. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 32(17), 1386–1392.
MINISTÉRIO DA CIÊNCIA, TECNOLOGIA E INOVAÇÃO (MCTI). (2012). Estratégia Nacional de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação 2012–2015 (p. 220). Balanço das Atividades Estruturantes. Brasília, DF.
Nassif, A., Feijo, C., & Araujo, E. (2013, October). Structural change and economic development: Is Brazil catching up or falling behind? (UNCTAD Discussion Paper 211, p. 28).
Oasmaa, A., & Czernik, S. (1999). Fuel oil quality of biomass pyrolysis oils state of the art for the end users. Energy Fuels, 13, 914–921.
Petter, F. A., & Madari, B. E. (2012). Biochar: Agronomic and environmental potential in Brazilian savannah soils. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 16, 761–768.
Pilz, H., Schweighofer, J., & Kletzer, E. (2005). The contribution of plastic products to resource efficiency (229 p.). Final Report Updated version 1.1. Plastics Europe (formerly APME) – Association of Plastics Manufacturers.
Raschka, A. & Carus, M. (2012). Industrial material use of biomass basic data for Germany, Europe and the world (28 p.). R&D project “Environmental innovation policy: More efficient resource use and climate protection through sustainable material use of biomass”.
Sokka, L., Koponen, K., & Keränen, J. T. (2015). Cascading use of wood in Finland – with comparison to selected EU countries (26 p.). Research Report VTT-R-03979-15.
UNICA. (2011). União da Indústria de Cana-de-Açúcar. Dados e Cotações–Estatísticas. Accessed August 2015, from http://www.unica.com.br/dadosCotacao/estatistica/
Van Haen, R. (2013). Innovations across the entire value pyramid of the biobased economy. Amsterdam: Bio Based Press.
World Economic Forum. (2016). Global competitiveness index (GCI) the global competitiveness report 2015–2016. Accessed February 2016, from http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2015-2016/
Zuniga, P., Negri, F., Dutz, M. A., & Pilat, D. (2016). Conditions for innovation in Brazil: A review of key issues and policy challenges. Workshop on innovation for productivity growth in Brazil IPEA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leao, A.L., Cesarino, I., Narine, S., Sain, M. (2017). Innovation Under the Bioeconomy Context in Brazil. In: Dabbert, S., Lewandowski, I., Weiss, J., Pyka, A. (eds) Knowledge-Driven Developments in the Bioeconomy. Economic Complexity and Evolution. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58374-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58374-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58373-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58374-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)