Skip to main content

Justice in Negotiations and Conflict Resolution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1168 Accesses

Part of the book series: Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ((RCS))

Abstract

It is widely recognized that justice matters for negotiation and conflict resolution. However, the pluralism of moral opinions and concepts of justice also introduces new fields of conflict. Rudolf Schuessler shows that considerations of procedural justice and meta-justice generally fail to offer a safe way out of this impasse, because they too are subject to a pluralism of approaches. It follows that justice in negotiations and conflict resolution needs itself to be negotiated. The guiding view of justice for a process of negotiation is to be established by negotiation in this process. This puts particular emphasis on the responsibility and conflict-mitigating attitudes of the negotiating parties and on norms of mutual respect that support a shared quest for mutually acceptable views on justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albin, Cecilia. 2001. Justice and Fairness in International Negotiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, Luc. 2011. A Lockean Defense of Grandfathering Emission Rights. In The Ethics of Global Climate Change, ed. Denis Arnold, 124–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, David. 2009. Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy. Philosophy Compass 5: 756–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, Jack. 2008. The Ethics of Realism. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, ed. Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal, 150–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorszynski, Julius. 1948. Catholic Teaching about the Morality of Falsehood. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Niall. 2015. Kissinger. The Idealist 1923–1986. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1988. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, Andreas, Andreas Löschel, Carsten Vogt, and Andreas Ziegler. 2010. On the Self-Interested Use of Equity in International Climate Negotiations. European Economic Review 54: 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, Margaret. 2002. Paris 1919. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, Christopher. 2009. Reasonable Disagreement: A Theory of Political Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Menkel-Meadow, Carrie, and Michael Wheeler (eds.). 2004. What’s Fair: Ethics for Negotiators. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1987. The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, John. 1996. Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, Paul. 1999. The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuessler, Rudolf. 2011. Climate Justice: A Question of Historic Responsibility? Journal of Global Ethics 7: 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Kants ethisches Lügenverbot—der Sonderfall der Lüge aus Furcht. Philosophisches Jahrbuch 120: 82–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Practical Ethics. In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, vol. 1, revised edition, ed. Robert Pasnau, 517–535. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Equal Per Capita Emissions Defended. Discussion Paper. http://www.academia.edu/RudolfSchuessler/Papers.

  • Siemann, Wolfram. 2016. Metternich. Munich: C.H. Beck.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Leigh. 2001. The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, William. 1994. Cooperative Models of Bargaining. In Handbook of Game Theory, vol. 2, ed. Robert Aumann and Sergiu Hart, 1237–1284. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagorin, Perez. 1990. Ways of Lying: Dissimulation, Persecution, and Conformity in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudolf Schuessler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schuessler, R. (2018). Justice in Negotiations and Conflict Resolution. In: Leiner, M., Schliesser, C. (eds) Alternative Approaches in Conflict Resolution . Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58359-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics