Abstract
Reconciliation should be conceived as an overarching approach to conflict resolution that focuses on processes of rebuilding relationships, states Martin Leiner. Its goal is to create ‘normal’ and trusting, and if possible, ‘good’ and peaceful relationships. Leiner defends reconciliation as an alternative approach to conflict resolution against four criticisms. These points of critique include debates on the sources of reconciliation, on whether reconciliation might be considered more appropriately as a mechanism or as an approach, on whether reconciliation is an idealistic goal or a process, and on the right timing for reconciliation processes to begin. Leiner outlines how reconciliation as a long-term project can in fact work by naming justice, truth, and resilience as fundamental components of reconciliation processes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Assefa, Hizkias. 2015. The Meaning of Reconciliation. In The Contemporary Conflict Resolution Reader, ed. Tom Woodhouse et al., 236–243. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Avruch, Kevin, and Christopher Mitchell (eds.). 2013. Conflict Resolution and Human Needs: Linking Theory and Practice. Routledge: Abingdon.
Bar-Tal, Daniel, and Gemma H. Bennink. 2004. The Nature of Reconciliation as an Outcome and as a Process. In From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation, ed. Yaacov Bar-Siman-Tov, 11–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bloomfield, David. 2006. On Good Terms: Clarifying Reconciliation. Berghof Report No. 14. Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management. http://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2011/2521/pdf/br14e.pdf. Accessed 23 Dec 2016.
Bouvier, Virginia M. (ed.). 2009. Colombia: Building Peace in a Time of War. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
De Waal, Frans. 1989. Peacemaking among Primates. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fischer, Martina. 2015. Transitional Justice and Reconciliation: Theory and Practice. In The Contemporary Conflict Resolution Reader, ed. Tom Woodhouse et al., 325–333. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Gardner Feldman, Lily. 2012. Germany’s Foreign Policy of Reconciliation: From Enmity to Amity. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Hardimon, Michael O. 1994. Hegel’s Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, George. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think, 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Leiner, Martin, and Susan Flämig. 2012. Reconciliation in the Middle of Dispute: Introduction to the Series. In Latin America between Conflict and Reconciliation, ed. Martin Flämig and Susan Leiner, 7–20. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
Miall, Hugh. 2004. Conflict Transformation: A Multi-Dimensional Task. Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management. http://www.berghof-foundation.org/fileadmin/redaktion/Publications/Handbook/Articles/miall_handbook.pdf. Accessed 23 Dec 2016.
Minow, Martha. 1998. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History After Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston: Beacon Press.
Prager, Carol A.L. 2003. Introduction. In Dilemmas of Reconciliation: Cases and Concepts, ed. Carol A.L. Prager and Trudy Govier, 1–26. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Zehr, Howard. 2015. The Little Book of Restorative Justice. Updated Edition. New York: Good Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leiner, M. (2018). Conclusion: From Conflict Resolution to Reconciliation. In: Leiner, M., Schliesser, C. (eds) Alternative Approaches in Conflict Resolution . Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58359-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58359-4_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58358-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58359-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)