Skip to main content

Connected Dynamics: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives on Family Life and the Transition to School

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Families and Transition to School

Abstract

Our main focus is the analysis of familial resources and strengths in terms of education and care within the wider context of policies and practices that pose challenges to families in their contact with the public educational system. First of all, we analyse three key concepts. They define the ways in which family can be seen as an educational environment of its own, and how institutions address families with specific demands. Against the background of empirical studies, we argue that little knowledge exists around how families deal in practice with the expectations placed upon them in their daily lives. The results of our study will help to close this gap by reconstructing how the process of transition to school is shaped by the family, and how its relation to the school has a deep impact on the family. Finally, we argue for differentiation within the empirical and theoretical modelling of the transition process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the American context we find comparable terms such as “overlapping spheres of influence” (Epstein et al. 2009).

  2. 2.

    The term refers to the two poles of education typical in the German context: “Erziehung” for upbringing or training and “Bildung” for education. In English-speaking contexts we find comparable terms such as “parent participation” or “family involvement” (Grant and Ray 2015).

  3. 3.

    The project is based at the University of Osnabrück. It is running from 2014 to 2017 and is financed by the DFG, the German Research Foundation. The project is led by Dominik Krinninger, and the project staff are Kaja Kesselhut and Richard Sandig. Marc Schulz is a cooperating partner in the project.

  4. 4.

    This is, at the same time, also an artefact of our specific sample.

  5. 5.

    See also Dockett et al. (2012) on this gap in support for families in need of assistance.

References

  • Andresen, S., Künstler, S., & Seddig, N. (2015). Von Adressatinnen und Nutzerinnen: Eltern in Kita und Schule. In M. Urban, M. Schulz, K. Meser, & S. Thoms (Eds.), Inklusion und Übergang – Perspektiven der Vernetzung von Kita und Grundschule (pp. 63–75). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, T. (2015). Das Ideal der Bildungs- und Erziehungspartnerschaft. Kritische Fragen an eine verstärkte Zusammenarbeit zwischen Kindertageseinrichtungen, Grundschulen und Familie. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büchner, P. (2011). Familie als Bildungsinstanz. In H. Macha & M. Witzke (Eds.), Familie. Handbuch der Erziehungswissenschaft 5 (pp. 153–175). Schöningh: Paderborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ). (2006). Familie zwischen Flexibilität und Verlässlichkeit. Perspektiven für eine lebenslaufbezogene Familienpolitik. Siebter Familienbericht. http://www.bmfsfj.de/doku/Publikationen/familienbericht/download/familienbericht_gesamt.pdf. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.

  • Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2007). Transitions to school. Perceptions, experiences and expectations. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockett, S., Perry, B., & Kearney, E. (2012). Family transitions as children start school. Family Matters, 90, 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., et al. (2009). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network-theory in education. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41, 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, V. (2012). Family policy and the politics of parenting: From function to competence. In M. Richter & S. Andresen (Eds.), The politicization of parenthood. Shifting private and public responsibilities in education and child rearing (pp. 13–26). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, K. B., & Ray, J. A. (Eds.). (2015). Home, school, and community collaboration: Culturally responsive family engagement. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graßhoff, G., Binz, C., Pfaff, A., Schmenger, S., & Ullrich, H. (2013). Eltern als Akteure im Übergang vom Elementar- in den Primarbereich. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griebel, W., Wildgruber, A., Held, J., Schuster, A., & Nagel, B. (2013). Partizipation im Übergangsmanagement von Kitas und Schulen. Eltern als Ressource. bildungsforschung 10(1). http://bildungsforschung.org/index.php/bildungsforschung/article/view/160/pdf_6. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.

  • Haase, K. (2012). Erziehungs- und Bildungspartnerschaft von Familie, Schule und Kinder- und Jugendhilfe im Kontext von Schulentwicklung. Kooperation auf “gleicher Augenhöhe” – realistische Leitvorstellung oder unerfüllbare Vision. Pädagogische Rundschau, 66(1), 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurczyk, K. (2014). Familie als Herstellungsleistung. Hintergründe und Konturen einer neuen Perspektive auf Familie. In K. Jurczyk, A. Lange, & B. Thiessen (Eds.), Doing family. Warum Familienleben heute nicht mehr selbstverständlich ist (pp. 50–70). Weinheim/Basel: Beltz Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krinninger, D. (2015). Family life as education. Ethnographic perspectives on how familial education emerges in families and in educational family research. In S. Bollig, M.-S. Honig, S. Neumann, & C. Seele (Eds.), MultiPluriTrans. Emerging fields in educational ethnography (pp. 297–314). Bielefeld: Transcript/New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krinninger, D., & Müller, H.-R. (2012). Die Bildung der Familie. Zwischenergebnisse aus einem ethnographischen Forschungsprojekt. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation, 32(3), 233–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, W. (2003). Lifelong learning in Germany – Financing and innovation: Skill development, education networks, support structures. Report of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) on “Good practice in the financing of lifeleong learning” within the framework of the project “Co-financing Lifelong Learning”. http://www.bmbf.de/pub/lifelong_learning_oecd_2003.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2015.

  • Margetts, K., & Kienig, A. (Eds.). (2013). International perspectives on transition to school: Reconceptualising beliefs, policy and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. H. J. (2011). Rethinking family practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, R. (2009). Norbert Elias and figurational sociology: The comeback of the century. Contemporary Sociology, 38(3), 215–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawrotzki, K. D. (2012). Parent-school relations in England and the USA: Partnership, problematized. In M. Richter & S. Andresen (Eds.), The Politicization of parenthood. Shifting private and public responsibilities in education and child rearing (pp. 69–83). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reutlinger, C. (2008). Bildungsorte, Bildungsräume und Bildungslandschaft im Spiegel von Ungleichheit – Kritischer Blick auf das “Räumeln” im Bildungsdiskurs. In P. Bollweg & H.-U. Otto (Eds.), Räume flexibler Bildung. Bildungslandschaft in der Diskussion (pp. 51–69). Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, M., & Andresen, S. (Eds.). (2012). The politicization of parenthood. Shifting private and public responsibilities in education and child rearing. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, M., Cloos, P., Meser, K., Objartel, V., Richter, A., Schulz, M., Thoms, S., Velten, J., & Werning, R. (2015). Prozessorientierte Verfahren der Bildungsdokumentation in inklusiven Settings. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walper, S., & Ross, J. (2001). Die Einschulung als Herausforderung und Chance für die ganze Familie. In G. Faust-Siehl & A. Speck-Hamdan (Eds.), Schulanfang ohne Umwege (pp. 30–52). Frankfurt: Grundschulverband.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Krinninger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krinninger, D., Schulz, M. (2017). Connected Dynamics: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives on Family Life and the Transition to School. In: Dockett, S., Griebel, W., Perry, B. (eds) Families and Transition to School. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58329-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58329-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58327-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58329-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics