Skip to main content

Primary School Choice and the ‘Good’ Mother: Balancing Complex Support Needs and Responsibility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The principle of school choice has become firmly embedded in the education context of Australia. This chapter examines the primary school choices made by three mothers described as having complex support needs, living in New South Wales, Australia. These needs related both to their own health and well-being, as well as those of other family members. The mothers participated in a series of conversational interviews as their children prepared for, and later started, school. Aligned with decisions about school choice, the mothers described the responsibilities they felt to make the ‘right’ school choices for their children, as well as a wide range of constraints they experienced. The school choices made by these mothers were shaped by their resources and their histories. Available economic capital influenced choices, as did the ways in which social and cultural capital was activated. For each of these mothers, school choice and responsible mothering were intertwined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitchison, C. (2010). Good mothers go school shopping. In S. Goodwin & K. Huppatz (Eds.), The good mother: Contemporary motherhoods in Australia (pp. 89–110). Sydney: Sydney University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angus, L. (2013). School choice: Neoliberal education policy and imagined futures. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(3), 395–413. doi:10.1080/01425692.2013.823835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). 2039.0 Information paper: An introduction to Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), 2006. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2039.0/. Accessed 12 Mar 2016.

  • Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J Ball. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., & Vincent, C. (1998). “I heard it on the grapevine”: “Hot” knowledge and school “choice”. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bifulco, R., & Ladd, H. (2006). School choice, racial segregation and test-score gaps: Evidence from North Carolina’s Charter school program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(1), 31–56. doi:10.1002/pam.20226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1997). The forms of capital. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education, culture, economy and society (pp. 46–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C., Proctor, H., & Sherrington, G. (2009). School choice: How parents negotiate the new school market in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory as an emergent method. In S. Nagy-Hesse-Biber & P. Leahy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 155–170). New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (2012). Talkin’ ‘bout a revolution: The social, political, and fantasmatic logics of education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 25(1), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.776990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockett, S., Perry, B., Kearney, E., Hampshire, A., Mason, J., & Schmied, V. (2011). Facilitating children’s transition to school from families with complex support needs. Albury: Research Institute for Professional Practice, Learning and Education, Charles Sturt University. https://www.csu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/517036/Facilitating-Childrens-Trans-School.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2016.

  • Dumais, S. (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and school success: The role of habitus. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 44–68. doi:10.2307/3090253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, R. (2009). Selling education through “culture”: Responses to the market by new, non-government schools. Australian Educational Researcher, 36(1), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exley, S. (2013). Making working-class parents think more like middle-class parents: Choice advisers in English education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(1), 77–94. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.689012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, B., & Elmore, R. (1996). Policy-making in the dark: Illuminating the school choice debate. In B. Fuller, R. Elmore, & G. Orfield (Eds.), Who chooses, who loses? Culture, institutions and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 1–21). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, A., Foskett, R., Johnston, B., & Paton, K. (2011). ‘Getting by’ or ‘getting ahead’? Gendered educational and career decision-making in networks of intimacy. In S. Jackson, I. Malcolm, & K. Thomas (Eds.), Gendered choices: Learning, work, identities in lifelong learning (Vol. 15, pp. 189–208). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, A., & Smith, D. (2005). Mothering for schooling. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C. (2011). ‘MySchool’ and others: Segregation and white flight. Australian Review of Public Affairs. http://www.australianreview.net/digest/2011/05/ho.html. Accessed 28 Aug 2016.

  • Hoxby, C. (2000). Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? The American Economic Review, 90(5), 1209–1238. doi:10.1257/aer.90.5.1209

  • James, D., & Beedell, P. (2010). Transgression for transition? White urban middle class families making and managing ‘against the grain’ school choices. In K. Ecclestone, G. Biesta, & M. Hughes (Eds.), Transitions and learning through the lifecourse (pp. 32–46). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janus, M., Kopechanski, L., Cameron, R., & Hughes, D. (2008). In transition: Experiences of parents of children with special needs at school entry. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(5), 479–485. doi:10.1007/s10643-007-0217-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, I., Spooner, C., & Valentine, K. (2007). What interventions are effective in improving outcomes for children of families with multiple and complex problems? Social Policy Research Centre/Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth. www.sprc.unsw.edu.au/media/File/Report_ARACY_ComplexProblems.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2016.

  • Kimelberg, S. M. (2014). Beyond test scores: Middle-class mothers, cultural capital, and the evaluation of urban public schools. Sociological Perspectives, 57(2), 208–228. doi:10.1177/0731121414523398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S. (2007). School reform and inequality in urban Australia: A case of residualizing the poor. In M. Duru-Bellat, S. Lamb, & R. Teese (Eds.), International studies in educational inequality, theory and policy (Vol. 3, pp. 1–38). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., & Lareau, A. (1988). Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps and glissandos in recent theoretical development. Sociological Theory, 6(2), 153–168. doi:10.2307/202113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher, K. (2002). Intergenerational ambivalence: Further steps in theory and research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(3), 585–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mockler, N. (2013). Reporting the education revolution’: MySchool.edu.au in the print media. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/01596306.2012.698860.

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (1997). Enrolment of students in government schools: A summary and consolidation of policy. New South Wales Department of Education and Training. https://www.det.nsw.edu.au/policies/student_admin/enrolment/enrolpol/PD20020006.shtml?level. Accessed 12 Mar 2015.

  • New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (2010). Disability programs. New South Wales Department of Education and Training. http://www.schools.nsw.edu.au/studentsupport/programs/disability.php. Accessed 12 Oct 2015.

  • Oria, A., Cardini, A., Ball, S., Stamou, E., Kolokitha, M., Vertigan, S., & Flores-Moreno, C. (2007). Urban education, the middle classes and their dilemmas of school choice. Journal of Education Policy, 22(1), 91–105. doi:10.1080/02680930610165791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posey, L. (2012). Middle and upper-middle class parent action for urban public schools: Promise or paradox? Teachers College Record, 114, 122–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raveaud, M., & van Zanten, A. (2007). Choosing the local school: Middle class parents’ values and social and ethnic mix in London and Paris. Journal of Education Policy, 22(1), 107–124. doi:10.1080/02680930601065817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D., & Ball, S. J. (1997). Spoilt for choice: The working classes and educational markets. Oxford Review of Education, 23(1), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D., & Ball, S. J. (1998). Making their minds up: Family dynamics and school choice. British Educational Research Journal, 24(4), 431–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, N. (2010, January 23). Gillard, greater transparency in schools reporting promotes informed choice. The Australian. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/education-out-on-the-table/story-e6frg6z6-1225822680430. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.

  • Saleebey, D. (Ed.). (1997). Common purpose: Strengthening families and neighbourhoods to rebuild America. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, D., Sanson A., Baxter J., Edwards, B., & Hayes, A. (2008). Home-to-school for financially disadvantaged children: Final report. Australian Institute of Family Studies and The Smith Family. www.thesmithfamily.com.au/webdata/resources/files/HometoSchool_FullReport_WEB.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2016.

  • Smrekar, C., & Goldring, E. (1998). School choice in urban America: Magnet schools and the pursuit of equity. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (2008). Qualitative case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 119–150). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, C., Ball, S., & Braun, A. (2010a). Between the estate and the state: Struggling to be a ‘good’ mother. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(2), 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, C., Braun, A., & Ball, S. (2010b). Local links, local knowledge: Choosing care settings and schools. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 279–298. doi:10.1080/01411920902919240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, A. (2010). Citizens and/or consumers: Mutations in the construction of concepts and practices of school choice. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 171–189. doi:10.1080/02680930903447671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windle, J. (2009). The limits of school choice: Some implications for accountability of selective practices and positional competition in Australian education. Critical Studies in Education, 1(3), 231–246. doi:10.1080/17508480903009566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woessmann, L., Ludemann, E., Schutz, G., & West, M. (2007). School accountability, autonomy, choice and the level of student achievement: International evidence from PISA 2003. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Education Working Paper No 13, Paris. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/school-accountability-autonomy-choice-and-the-level-of-student-achievement_246402531617. Accessed 23 Nov 2016.

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council Linkages Grant [LP0669546]. Partners in the grant were Mission Australia and the then NSW Department of Communities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sue Dockett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dockett, S., Perry, B. (2017). Primary School Choice and the ‘Good’ Mother: Balancing Complex Support Needs and Responsibility. In: Dockett, S., Griebel, W., Perry, B. (eds) Families and Transition to School. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58329-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58329-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58327-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58329-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics