Partnering in the Periphery

  • Wendy GoffEmail author
Part of the International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development book series (CHILD, volume 21)


In this chapter data from a wider project that examined adult relationships as children make the transition to school is shared. It is argued that whilst it is important that educators and families work together to support children through the transition process, that this can be achieved in various ways. Data presented in this chapter demonstrates how a preschool educator and primary school educator came together with families to support children’s learning as they made the move to school. Whilst the families and educators did not work in what might be described as a “traditional partnership model” they were still able to come together to support the mathematical learning of children. This chapter details this process and offers a different way to conceptualise how families and educators might work together to support the learning of children as they make the transition to school. The chapter concludes by offering suggestions for future research.


  1. Ahtola, A., Silinskas, G., Poikoken, P.-L., Kontoniemi, M., Niemi, P., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2011). Transition to formal schooling: Do transition practices matter for academic performance? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, J. (2009). Effective home-school communication. Family Involvement Network of Educators (FINE) Newsletter, 1(1). Accessed 13 Jan 2016.
  3. Anderson, I. (2009). Mapping the cultural interface. Postcolonial Studies, 12(2), 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Socio-economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) 2011. Accessed 13 Jan 2016.
  5. Boethel, M. (2003). Diversity: School, family and community connections: Annual synthesis (pp. 1–90). Austin: National Center for Family and Community Connections with Schools.Google Scholar
  6. Burgess-Limerick, T., & Burgess-Limerick, R. (1998). Conversational interviews and multiple-case research in psychology. Australian Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christenson, S. L., & Sheridan, S. M. (2001). School and families: Creating essential connections for learning. New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Daniel, G. (2011). Family–school partnerships: Towards sustainable pedagogical practice. Asia–Pacific Journal of Educator Education, 39(2), 165–176.Google Scholar
  9. Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., Orr, M. T., & Cohen, C. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs. Stanford: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Deslandes, R. (2001). A bridge to the future – Collaboration between parents, schools and communities. In F. Smit, K. van der Wolf & P. Sleegers (Eds.), ERNAPE 2001 Conference. ITS Stitchting Katholieke Universiteit to Nijmegen NL. Accessed 13 Oct 2015.
  11. Dockett, S., Perry, B., & Kearney, E. (2012). Family transitions as children start school. Family Matters, 90, 57–67.Google Scholar
  12. Dunst, C. J., Johanson, C., Rounds, T., Trivette, C. M., & Hamby, D. (1992). Characteristics of parent professional partnerships. In S. L. Christenson & J. C. Conoley (Eds.), Home-school collaboration : Enhancing children’s academic and social competence (pp. 157–174). Maryland, The National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  13. Educational Transitions and Change (ETC) Research Group. (2011). Transition to school: Position statement. Albury–Wodonga: Research Institute for Professional Practice, Learning and Education, Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  14. Epstein, J. L. (1987). Towards a theory of family–school connections: Educator practices and parent involvement. In K. Hurrelmann, F. X. Kaufmann, & F. Lasel (Eds.), Social intervention: Potential and constraints (pp. 121–136). New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  15. Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 701–712.Google Scholar
  16. Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  17. Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2006). Moving forward: Ideas for research on school, family, and community partnerships. In C. F. Conrad & R. Serlin (Eds.), SAGE Handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 117–137). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  18. Fantuzzo, J., McWayne, C., Perry, M., & Childs, S. (2004). Multiple dimensions of family involvement and their relations to behavioral and learning competencies for urban, low-income children. School Psychology Review, 33(4), 467–480.Google Scholar
  19. Galindo, C., & Sheldon, S. B. (2012). School and home connections and children’s kindergarten achievement gains: The mediating role of family involvement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gillanders, C., McKInney, M., & Ritchie, S. (2012). What kind of school would you like for your children? Exploring minority mothers’ beliefs to promote home–school partnerships. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(5), 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herrington, J., McKenney, S., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (2007). Design-based research and doctoral students: Guidelines for preparing a dissertation proposal. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp. 4089–4097.Google Scholar
  22. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? Review of Educational Research, 67(3), 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaiser, A., & Trent-Stainbrook, A. (2010). Family-school partnerships and communication Interventions for young children with disabilities. In A. Kaiser & A. Trent Stainbrook (Eds.), Handbook of family-school partnerships (pp. 287–312). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (1999). Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 267–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Melhuish, E., Phan, M., Sylva, K., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2008). Effects of the home learning environment and preschool center experience upon literacy and numeracy development in early primary school. Journal of Social Issues, 64(1), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nakata, M. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and the cultural interface: Underlying issues at the intersection of knowledge and information systems. IFLA Journal, 28(5-6), 281–291. doi: 10.1177/034003520202800513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakata, M. (2007). The cultural interface. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36(Supplementary), 7–14.;dn=903053619367156;res=IELHSS. Accessed 14 Dec 2015.
  28. Rosenberg, H., Lopez, M. E., & Westmoreland, H. (2009). Family engagement: A shared responsibility. Family Involvement Network of Educators (FINE) Newsletter, 1(4). Accessed 13 Oct 2015.
  29. Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2010). Learning in the home and at school: How working class children succeed ‘against the odds’. British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Siraj-Blatchford, I., Muttock, S., Sylva, K., Gilden, R., & Bell, D. (2002). Researching effective pedagogy in the early years. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  31. Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (Eds.). (2010). Early childhood matters: Evidence from the Effective Preschool and Primary Education project. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations