Advertisement

Preparing to Start School: Parent and Early Childhood Educator Narratives

  • Joanne S. LehrerEmail author
  • Nathalie Bigras
  • Isabelle Laurin
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development book series (CHILD, volume 21)

Abstract

This chapter presents a narrative multi-case study that draws on a postocolonial and postmodern narrative theoretical framework and methodology. The narratives recounted by three mothers, four educators, and home-childcare communication documents concerning the children's upcoming transition to school and educator-parent relationships are presented. For example, Marie-Ève’s narrative is centred around her own sense of comfort at the childcare centre; focuses on the difficulties of transitioning between educators for her son, Matéo; and explains why she believes that he will do well in school. She also identifies home routines to modify once her son starts school. Anne, Matéo’s educator, describes Marie-Ève’s involvement in centre activities, and blames Marie-Ève’s difficulty with Matéo’s transition from group to group on the fact that she is a single mother of an only child. Nicholas has two different educators, Suzanne and Nadia. His mother Audrey is thrilled with her experience at the childcare centre, and relies on additional personnel at the centre, such as the pedagogical advisor, for support and assistance. She claims to not be ready for her son to start school. His two educators have very different understandings of the family, and very different concerns about the child starting school. Finally, Emma’s mom Christine was shocked to find out that her daughter had a language delay when she began childcare at age four, and recounts the routines she instituted at home in order to prepare her two daughters for childcare. Hannah, Emma’s educator, describes the process of building a trusting relationship with Christine. She is worried about Emma starting school, but hopes that she will be fine, because of Christine’s active involvement in the childcare centre. The analysis/interpretation of the narratives focuses on the ways in which mothers and educators draw on and resist metanarratives of deficiency, school readiness, and pedagogicalization of parents when they narrate their transition experiences. For example, three of the educators’ narratives draw on a metanarrative of deficiency to judge divorced or single parent families, implying that these families can be detrimental to children’s well-being, while the other educator was able to craft a counternarrative by focusing on the father’s well-being as a member of the childcare centre community.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada as well as the Fonds de Recherche Société et Culture Québec. We would also like to thank Maria Frangos for editing and proofreading assistance.

References

  1. Ackesjö, H. (2013). Children crossing borders: School visits as initial incorporation rites in transition to preschool class. International Journal of Early Childhood, 45, 387–410. doi: 10.1007/s13158-013-0080-7.
  2. Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal, Direction de santé publique [ASSSM-DSP]. (2008). Enquête sur la maturité scolaire des enfants montréalais. En route pour l’école ! [Survey of school readiness of Montreal Children. On the way to school!] Montréal: Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, M., Squire, C., & Tamboukou, M. (Eds.). (2008). Doing narrative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bamberg, M. (2004). Considering counter narratives. In M. Bamberg & M. Andrews (Eds.), Considering counter narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense (pp. 354–371). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barberis, A. D. (2008). Head start parents’ perceptions of parental involvement during their children’s transition to kindergarten: A phenomenological study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Oregon: Portland State University.Google Scholar
  6. Brooks-Gunn, J., Rouse, C., & McLanahan, S. (2007). Racial and ethnic gaps in school readiness. In R. C. Pianta, M. J. Cox, & K. Snow (Eds.), School readiness and the transition to kindergarten in the era of accountability (pp. 283–306). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  7. CASIOPE. (2008). Démarche passage à l’école [Moving on to school process]. http://www.casiope.org/?ADD58C03-13AE-449D-B954-EA47A34B9F66. Accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  8. Copple, C. (Ed.). (1997). Getting a good start in school. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.Google Scholar
  9. Crosnoe, R., & Cooper, C. E. (2010). Economically disadvantaged children’s transitions into elementary school: Linking family processes, school contexts, and educational policy. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 258–291. doi: 10.3102/0002831209351564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Santo, A., & Berman, R. (2012). Beyond the preschool years: Children’s perceptions about starting kindergarten. Children and Society, 26, 469–479. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00360.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dockett, S. (2014). Transition to school: Normative or relative? In B. Perry, S. Dockett, & A. Petriwyskyj (Eds.), Transitions to school: International research, policy and practice (pp. 187–200). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2004). Starting school: Perspectives of Australian children, parents and educators. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(2), 171–189. doi: 10.1177/1476718X04042976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Readiness for school: A relational construct. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(1), 20–26.Google Scholar
  14. Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2015). Transition to school: Times of opportunity, expectation, aspiration, and entitlement. In J. M. Iorio & W. Parnell (Eds.), Rethinking readiness in early childhood education: Implications for policy and practice (pp. 123–139). New York: Palmgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Dockett, S., Perry, B., & Kearney, E. (2011). Starting school with special needs: Issues for families with complex support needs as their children start school. Exceptionality Education International, 21(2), 45–61.Google Scholar
  16. Doucet, F. (2008). How African American parents understand their and teachers’ roles in children’s schooling and what this means for preparing preservice teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 29, 108–139. doi: 10.1080/10901020802059441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doucet, F., & Tudge, J. (2007). Co-constructing the transition to school: Reframing the novice versus expert roles of children, parents and teachers from a cultural perspective. In R. C. Pianta, M. J. Cox, & K. L. Snow (Eds.), School readiness and the transition to kindergarten (pp. 307–328). Baltimore: Brooks Cole.Google Scholar
  18. Einarsdóttir, J. (2007). Children’s voices on the transition from preschool to primary school. In A.-W. Dunlop & H. Fabian (Eds.), Transitions in the early years: Debating continuity and progression for children in early education (pp. 74–91). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  19. Evans, K. (2013). School readiness: The struggle for complexity. LEARNing Landscapes, 7(1), 171–186. www.learninglandscapes.ca. Accessed 17 Dec 2015.Google Scholar
  20. Fabian, H., & Dunlop, A.-W. (2006). Outcomes of good practice in transition processes for children entering primary school. Background paper prepared for the education for all global monitoring report 2007. Strong foundations: Early childhood care and education, UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001474/147463e.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  21. Fantuzzo, J. W., Rouse, H. L., Mcdermott, P. A., Childs, S., & Weiss, A. (2005). Early childhood experiences and kindergarten success: A population-based study of a large urban setting. School Psychology Review, 34(4), 571–588.Google Scholar
  22. Farran, D. C. (2011). Rethinking school readiness. Exceptionality Education International, 21(2), 5–15.Google Scholar
  23. Québec, F (2009). Status report on Québec’s family policy. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec. http://www.budget.finances.gouv.qc.ca/budget/2009-2010/en/documents/pdf/FamilyPolicy.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  24. Gouvernement du Québec. (2015). Educational childcare act. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec. http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php?type=2&file=/S_4_1_1/S4_1_1_A.html. Accessed 18 Oct 2015.Google Scholar
  25. Gouvernement du Québec. (2016). Basic school regulation for preschool, elementary and secondary education. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec. http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php?type=2&file=/I_13_3/I13_3R8_A.HTM. Accessed 18 Oct 2015.Google Scholar
  26. Griebel, W., & Niesel, R. (2000). The children’s voice in the complex transition into kindergarten and school. Paper presented at the 10th European early childhood education research association conference, London, 29 August–1 September. https://extranet.education.unimelb.edu.au/LED/tec/pdf/griebelniesel1.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  27. Griebel, W., & Niesel, R. (2002). Co-constructing transition into kindergarten and school. In H. Fabian & A.-W. Dunlop (Eds.), Transitions in the early years. Debating continuity and progression for children in early education (pp. 64–75). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  28. Heckman, J. (2011). The economics of inequality: The value of early childhood education. Amercian Educator, 35(1), 31–35, 47. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ920516.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  29. Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2008). The free association narrative interview method. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 296–315). Sevenoaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Humblet, P., & Vandenbroeck, M. (2007). Sauver l’enfant pour sauver le monde, le care et la (re)construction de problèmes sociaux. [Saving the child to save the world, child care and (re)construction of social problem]. In G. Brougères & M. Vanderbroeck (Eds.), Repenser l’éducation des jeunes enfants (pp. 189–206). Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  31. Janus, M., & Offord, D. (2007). Development and psychometric properties of the Early Development Index (EDI): A measure of children’s school readiness. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 39, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. McCain, M. N., Mustard, J. F., & McCuaig, K. (2011). Early years study 3: Making decisions taking action. Toronto: Margaret & Wallace McCain Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  34. Memmi, A. (1967). The colonizer and the colonized. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir, et du Sport (MELS). (2010). Guide for supporting a successful school transition. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec. http://www.agencesss04.qc.ca/images/images/accessibilitelinguistique/Guide%20school%20transition.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2015.Google Scholar
  36. Ministère de la Famille et des Aînés (MFA). (2007). Meeting early childhood needs: Québec’s educational program for childcare services, update. Québec and Montréal: Ministère de la Familles et des Aînés. https://www.mfa.gouv.qc.ca/fr/publication/documents/programme_educatif_en.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2015.Google Scholar
  37. Niesel, R., & Griebel, W. (2007). Enhancing the competence of transition systems through co-construction. In A.-W. Dunlop & H. Fabian (Eds.), Informing transitions in the early years: Research, policy and practice (pp. 21–32). Berkshire, England: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Oliver, L. N., Dunn, J. R., Kohen, D. E., & Hertzman, C. (2007). Do neighbourhoods influence the readiness to learn of kindergarten children inVancouver? A multilevel analysis of neighbourhood effects. Environment & Planning A, 39, 848–868. doi: 10.1068/a37126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Perry, B. (2014). Social justice dimensions of starting school. In B. Perry, S. Dockett, & A. Petriwyskyj (Eds.), Transitions to school: International research, policy and practice (pp. 175–186). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peters, S. (2010). Literature review: Transition from early childhood education to school. Report to the Ministry of Education. Hamilton, Nouvelle-Zélande : New Zealand Ministry of Education. http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/ece/literature-review-transition-from-early-childhood-education-to-school/executive-summary. Accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  41. Petriwyskyj, A. (2014). Critical theory and inclusive transitions to school. In B. Perry, S. Dockett, & A. Petriwyskyj (Eds.), Transitions to school: International research, policy and practice (pp. 201–218). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pianta, R. C., Cox, M. J., & Snow, K. (Eds.). (2007). School readiness and the transition to kindergarten in the era of accountability. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  43. Popkewitz, T. S. (2003). Governing the child and pedagogicalization of the parent: A historical excursis into the present. In M. N. Bloch, K. Holmlund, I. Moqvist, & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Governing children, families, and education: Restructuring the welfare state (pp. 35–62). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ramey, C. T., & Ramey, S. L. (2004). Early learning and school readiness: Can early intervention make a difference? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(4), 471–491. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2004.0034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Riessman, C. K. (2007). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Rimm-Kaufman, S., & Pianta, R. C. (2000). An ecological perspective on the transition to kindergarten: A theoretical framework to guide empirical research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(5), 491–511. doi: 10.1016/S0193-3973(00)00051-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simard, M., Tremblay, M.-E., Lavoie, A., & Audet, N. (2013). Enquête québécoise sur le développement des enfants à la maternelle 2012 [Quebec survey on child development in kidnergarten 2012]. Québec: Institut de la Statistique du Québec.Google Scholar
  48. Spivak, G. C. (1990). The post-colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Zilber, T. B., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Lieblich, A. (2008). The embedded narrative: Navigating through multiple contexts. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(6), 1047–1069. doi: 10.1177/1077800408321616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanne S. Lehrer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nathalie Bigras
    • 2
  • Isabelle Laurin
    • 3
  1. 1.Université du Québec en OutaouaisGatineauCanada
  2. 2.Université du Québec à MontréalMontréalCanada
  3. 3.Direction régionale de santé publique du CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l’Île-de-MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations