Conclusion: The Spiral Progression Framework



The final chapter synthesises the data explored in Chapters 4, 5, 6, and 7, in order to create a table which demonstrates the stages of the spiral progression framework. This should be an accessible model in supporting teachers to further develop the use of film in the primary curriculum. It emphasises the need for the framework to be a spiral model, as children will move around the stages, depending on the complexity of the text, and it revisits how this can be useful in supporting children to transfer their reading skills across a range of media. It explores the comparisons which can be made between the reading of print and film. It also considers the limitations of this study, the scope for future research and the implications for policy and practice.


Bazalgette Film Reading Film Club curriculumCurriculum Printed Text Reads 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bazalgette, C. (2010). Teaching media in primary schools. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bearne, E., & Wolstencroft, H. (2007). Visual approaches to teaching writing: Multimodal literacy 5–11. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Bearne, E., & Bazalgette, C. (2010). Beyond words: Developing children’s response to multimodal text. Leicester: UKLA.Google Scholar
  4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: King’s College School of Education.Google Scholar
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. British Film Institute. (2003). Look again. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  7. British Film Institute. (2012). Film forever. London: BFI Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Buckingham, D., & Willett, R. (2006). Digital generations—Children, young people and new media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Buckland, W. (2008). Film studies. Oxon: Hodder Headline.Google Scholar
  11. Burn, A. (2007). The place of digital video in the curriculum. In R. Andrews & C. A. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Sage handbook of e-learning research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Burn, A., & Parker, D. (2003). Analysing media texts. London: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
  13. Burn, A., & Durran, J. (2007). Media literacy in schools—Practice, production and progression. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, B. (2014). Enhancing English teaching through film, English 4–11, Number 50, Spring 2014. Leicester: UKLA.Google Scholar
  15. Creswell, J. W. (1988). Qualitative inquiry and research design—Choosing among five traditions. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Department for Education. (2013a, July). Primary assessment and accountability under the new national curriculum. London: DfE.Google Scholar
  17. Department for Education. (2013b, September). The national curriculum in England—Framework document. London: DfE.Google Scholar
  18. Essex Writing Project Group. (2007). Lights, camera, action—Using a multimedia approach to switching on turned off writers. Essex: Essex County Council.Google Scholar
  19. International Association for the Evaluation of Education Achievement, Mullis, V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2011). Progress in international reading study, international results in reading. Boston: Lynch School of Education.Google Scholar
  20. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levy, R. (2011). Young children reading at home and at school. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1999). Further notes on the four resources model [Online]. Retrieved June 24, 2011, from
  23. Marsh, J. (2005). Ritual, performance and identity construction: Young children’s engagement with popular culture and media texts. In J. Marsh (Ed.), Popular culture, new media and digital technology in early childhood. Oxen: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marsh, J., & Bearne, E. (2008). Moving literacy on. Leicester: The University of Sheffield and UKLA.Google Scholar
  25. Parry, B. (2013). Children, film and literacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. QCA. (2008). Assessing pupil progress—Assessment guidelines for reading/assessment guidelines for writing [Online]. Retrieved August 2, 2010, from
  27. Rabinowitz, P. J. (1987). Before reading: Narrative conventions and the politics of interpretation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Robinson, M., & Mackey, M. (2003). Film and television. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Robinson, M., & Mackey, M. (2010). Film and television. In J. Larson & J. Marsh (Eds.), The Sage handbook of early childhood literacy (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Scottish Government. (2008). Curriculum for excellence. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  31. Scottish Screen. (2009). Moving image education in Scotland [Online]. Retrieved July 27, 2013, from
  32. Scottish Screen. (2013). Film and the curriculum for excellence [Online]. Retrieved July 30, 2013, from
  33. Tyner, K. (1998). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. UK Film Council. (2008). Film: 21st century literacy [Online]. Retrieved June 26, 2011, from

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.J H Bulman Consultancy LtdMarket RasenUK

Personalised recommendations