Advertisement

An Overview of the Research Visits

Chapter
  • 392 Downloads

Abstract

The focus of each visit is explored in this chapter in a chronological sequence. It outlines the purposes and methods of each visit and establishes how, although there were long-term objectives to the project, each visit was built around the findings from the previous one. It explains how at the end of the second year, it could have been considered that a saturation point had been reached, as the focus group children were not demonstrating any further progression. I therefore wrote and delivered an ‘intervention’ programme for the third year which would enable the children to explore film in a wider context and read it as a text in its own right.

References

  1. Anderson, L. W. (1999). Rethinking Bloom’s taxonomy: Implications for testing and assessment [Online]. Retrieved May 20, 2013, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED435630.pdf
  2. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company.Google Scholar
  3. British Film Institute. (2002). Moving images in the classroom. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  4. British Film Institute. (2007). Reframing literacy [Online]. Retrieved June 24, 2011, from http://www.21stcenturyliteracy.org.uk/docs/Reframing_Literacy.pdf
  5. Browne, A. (1992). The tunnel. London: Walker Books.Google Scholar
  6. DeVito, D. (Director). (1996). Matilda [Film]. USA: TriStar Pictures.Google Scholar
  7. Film Education. (2010). Teaching trailers primary [CD-ROM]. London: Film Education.Google Scholar
  8. Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1999). Further notes on the four resources model [Online]. Retrieved June 24, 2011, from http://www.readingonline.org/research/lukefreebody.html
  9. Morris, H. (2005). Seeing the story—What is the impact on moving image on motivation and competence in narrative writing at the end of KS2? Unpublished Masters dissertation, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.Google Scholar
  10. Park, N. (Director). (2005). Wallace and Gromit, three cracking adventures—A close shave [Animated film]. London: BBC/Aardman. DVD.Google Scholar
  11. Rabinowitz, P. J. (1987). Before reading: Narrative conventions and the politics of interpretation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Unkrich, L. (Director). (2010). Toy story 3 [Film]. USA: Disney Pixar.Google Scholar
  13. Williams, S., Newton, K., & Fehily, C. (2003). Talking pictures: Thinking through photographs. Birmingham: Imaginative Minds/Iris.Google Scholar
  14. White, S. (Director). (2010). Nanny McPhee and the big bang [Film]. USA: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.J H Bulman Consultancy LtdMarket RasenUK

Personalised recommendations