Advertisement

Microscale Governance and Temporal Regulations in Beach Management

  • Isaac Azuz-AdeathEmail author
  • Norma Patricia Muñoz-Sevilla
  • Evelia Rivera-Arriaga
  • Lidia Silva-Íñiguez
  • Oscar Arizpe-Covarrubias
  • Omar Cervantes
  • Gisela García-Morales
  • José Alfredo Arreola-Lizárraga
  • Laura Martínez-Ríos
  • Alejandra Cortés-Ruíz
  • Alfredo Ortega-Rubio
Chapter
Part of the Coastal Research Library book series (COASTALRL, volume 24)

Abstract

This chapter discusses processes and structures of nearshore (marine) and costal governance by focusing on microscale (beach level) situations, inside the Mexican legal and regulatory context. The document compares the efficiency and effectivity of national initiatives, programs and actions with the local –and sometime temporal- measures emanated at beach, community or county level. The principal focus of this research is the lack of articulation and the existence of temporal gaps between managerial decisions related with governance, among national and local institutions and stakeholders, and its impacts towards beach sustainability. Looking at several study places (most of them urban touristic beaches) in the Pacific, Gulf of California and Gulf of Mexico littoral, the paper identify the best local governance (microscale governance) practices, and stablish routes of action toward their implementation at national level.

Keyword

Beach management Governance Microscale governance Mexico 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors like to thank CETYS University and its Center of Excellence for Innovation and Design for the support given for this research as well as the financial support provided by the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT) (Grants numbers 269540 of Redes Temáticas and 251919 of Ciencia Básica). We appreciate also the helpful information provided by Dra Leticia Alpuche Gual.

References

  1. Azuz I (2015) La desigualdad en las zonas costeras. Una visión desde México Boletín de la Red Iberoamericana de Manejo Integral Costero (IBERMAR), 9:15–16Google Scholar
  2. Azuz I, Cortéz A (2016) Governance and socioeconomics of Gulf of California large marine ecosystem. Environ Dev.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2016.09.003
  3. Azuz I, Rivera E, Muñoz P et al (2011) Política nacional para el desarrollo sustentable de océanos y costas de México. Génesis y gestión. Región y Sociedad 50(XXII):279–289Google Scholar
  4. Barragán JM (2013). La futura gestión del litoral en España: ¿oportunidad para todos o beneficios para unos pocos? Boletín de la Red Iberoamericana de Manejo Integral Costero (IBERMAR) 7:5Google Scholar
  5. Belfiore S, Barbiére J, Bowen R et al (2006) A handbook for measuring the progress and outcomes of integrated coastal and ocean management. IOC manuals and guides 46, ICAM Dossier 2, UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Botero C, Williams A, Cabrera J (2015) Advances in beach management in Latin America: overview from certification schemes. In: Finkl C, Makowski C (eds) Environmental management and governance. Advances in coastal and marine resources, coastal research library 8. Springer, New York\London, pp 33–63Google Scholar
  7. Botero C, Fanning L, Milanes C et al (2016) An indicator framework for assessing progress in land and marine planning in Colombia and Cuba. Ecol Indic 64:181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cash D, Adger W, Berkes F et al (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cervantes O, Espejel I (2008) Design of an integrated evaluation index for recreational beaches. Ocean Coast Manag 51(5):410–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cervantes O, Espejel I, Arellano E et al (2008) Users’ perception as a tool to improve urban beach planning and management. Environ Manag 42(2):249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cervantes O, Verduzco-Zapata G, Botero C et al (2015) Determination of risk to users by the spatial and temporal variation of rip currents on the beach of Santiago bay, Manzanillo, Mexico: beach hazards and safety strategy as tool for coastal zone management. Ocean Coast Manag 118:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Córdova A, Rosete F, Enríquez G et al (2009) Ordenamiento ecológico marino. Visión integrada de la regionalización. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT), Instituto Nacional de Ecología (INE), México, D.FGoogle Scholar
  13. Fanning L, Mahon R, McConney P et al (2007) A large marine ecosystem governance framework. Mar Policy 31:434–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foley P, Mather C, Neis B (2015) Governing enclosure for coastal communities: social embeddedness in a Canadian shrimp fishery. Mar Policy 61:390–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frampton APR (2010) A review of amenity beaches. J Coast Res 26(6):1112–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freitas D, Smith T, Stokes A (2013) Planning for uncertainty: local scale governance. Ocean Coast Manag 86:72–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibson C, Ostrom E, Ahn T (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimension of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ 32:217–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hollway J, Koskien J (2016) Multilevel embeddedness: the case of the global fisheries governance complex. Soc Netw 44:281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huamantinco M, Revollo N, Delrieux C, Piccolo M, Perillo G (2016) Beach carrying capacity assessment trough image processing tools for coastal management. Ocean Coast Manag 130:138–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. INEGI (2016) Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía de México. http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/proyectos/ccpv/cpv2010/Default.aspx
  21. Jentoft S, van Son T, Bjørkan M (2007) Marine protected areas: a governance system analysis. Hum Ecol 35:611–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. LGBN (2004/2015) Ley General de Bienes Nacionales. Diario Oficial de la Federación del 20-05-2004. Última reforma en el Diario Oficial de la Federación del 17-12-2015. Available at: [http://www.ordenjuridico.gob.mx/]
  23. LGCC (2012/2015) Ley General de Cambio Climático. Diario Oficial de la Federación del 06-06-2012. Última reforma en el Diario Oficial de la Federación del 13-05-2015. Available at: [http://www.ordenjuridico.gob.mx/]
  24. LGEEPA (1988/2015) Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente. Diario Oficial de la Federación del 28-01-1988. Última reforma en el Diario Oficial de la Federación del 09-01-2015. Available at: [http://www.ordenjuridico.gob.mx/]
  25. Lozoya J, Sardá R, Jiménez JA (2014) Users expectations and the need for differential beach management frameworks along the costa Brava: urban vs. natural protected beaches. Land Use Policy 38:397–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marzetti S, Disegna M, Koutrakis E et al (2016) Visitors’ awareness of ICZM and WTP for beach preservation in four European Mediterranean regions. Mar Policy 63:100–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MRC (2009/2012) Coastal Management Guidelines 2009 and Amendment 2012. Queensland Government and Mackay Regional Council, Australian Government, pp 19. Available at: http://www.mackay.qld.gov.au/environment/natural_environment/coastal_management
  28. MSWQ (2003) Monitoring system for water quality on beaches. Mexican Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Health (SEMARNAT and SS) http://apps1.semarnat.gob.mx/dgeia/gob-mx/playas/
  29. NMX-AA-120-SCFI (2006) Norma Mexicana que establece los requisitos y especificaciones de sustentabilidad de calidad de playas. Diario Oficial de la Federación de fecha 06-julio-2006 Available at: http://www.economia-nmx.gob.mx/normasmx/consulta.nmx
  30. Olsen S, Sutinen J, Juda L et al (2006) A handbook on governance and socioeconomics of large marine ecosystems. Coastal Resource Center, University of Rode Island, NarragansettGoogle Scholar
  31. Oseguera J, Rosete F, Sorani V (2010) Reflexiones acerca del ordenamiento ecológico en México. Investigación Ambiental 2(2):32–40Google Scholar
  32. Österblom H, Gårdmark A, Bergström L et al (2010) Making the ecosystem approach operational –can regime shifts in ecological- and governance systems facilitate the transition? Mar Policy 34:1290–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pittman J, Armitage D (2016) Governance across the land-sea interface: a systematic review. Environ Sci Pol 64:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. PNMC (2012) Política Nacional de Mares y Costas de México (National Policy for Seas and Coast). Comisión Intersecretarial para el Manejo Sustentable de Mares y Costas (CIMARES), pp 97 Availabel at: http://www.semarnat.gob.mx/archivosanteriores/dialogonacional/Documents/Informacion%20Relevante/Politica%20Mares%20y%20Costas_espa%C3%B1ol.pdf
  35. Rodella I, Corbau C, Simeone U et al (2017) Assessment of the relationship between geomorphological evolution, carrying capacity and users’ perception: case studies in Emilia-Romagna (Italy). Tour Manag 59:7–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosete F, Enríquez G, Córdova A (2006) El ordenamiento ecológico marino y costero: tendencias y perspectivas. Gaceta Ecológica 78:47–63Google Scholar
  37. SEMARNAT (2006) Política Ambiental Nacional para el Desarrollo Sustentable de Océanos y Costas. Estrategias para su conservación y uso sustentable. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT), México, D.F., p 89Google Scholar
  38. SEMARNAT (2007) Estrategia Nacional para el Ordenamiento Ecológico del Territorio en Mares y Costas. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT), Colección Legal, p 28Google Scholar
  39. Semeoshenkova V, Newton A (2015) Overview of erosion and beach quality issues in three Southern European countries: Portugal, Spain and Italy. Ocean Coast Manag 118:12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Silva R, Villatoro M, Ramos F et al (2014) Caracterización de la zona costera y planteamiento de elementos técnicos para la elaboración de criterios de regulación y manejo sustentable. Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), p 118Google Scholar
  41. Simpson S, Brown G, Peterson A et al (2016) Stakeholder perspectives for coastal ecosystem services and influences on value integration in policy. Ocean Coast Manag 126:9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tatenhove J, Leeuwen J, Soma K (2015) Marine Governance as Processes of Regionalization: Conclusions from this special issue. Ocean Coast Manag 117:70-74Google Scholar
  43. Thoe W, Gold M, Griesbach A et al (2014) Predicting water quality at Santa Monica beach: evaluation of five different models for public notification of unsafe swimming conditions. Water Res 67:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isaac Azuz-Adeath
    • 1
    Email author
  • Norma Patricia Muñoz-Sevilla
    • 3
  • Evelia Rivera-Arriaga
    • 4
  • Lidia Silva-Íñiguez
    • 5
  • Oscar Arizpe-Covarrubias
    • 6
  • Omar Cervantes
    • 7
  • Gisela García-Morales
    • 8
  • José Alfredo Arreola-Lizárraga
    • 8
  • Laura Martínez-Ríos
    • 9
  • Alejandra Cortés-Ruíz
    • 1
  • Alfredo Ortega-Rubio
    • 2
  1. 1.Centro de Enseñanza Técnica y Superior (CETYS Universidad)EnsenadaMéxico
  2. 2.Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del NoroesteLa PazMexico
  3. 3.Instituto Politécnico NacionalCiudad de MéxicoMexico
  4. 4.Universidad Autónoma de CampecheCampecheMexico
  5. 5.Universidad de Colima, ManzanilloColimaMexico
  6. 6.Universidad Autónoma de Baja California SurLa PazMexico
  7. 7.Facultad de Ciencias MarinasUniversidad de ColimaManzanilloMexico
  8. 8.Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del NoroesteGuaymasMexico
  9. 9.Organización Pro EsterosEnsenadaMexico

Personalised recommendations