Advertisement

Remote Sensing Data and Image Classification Algorithms in the Identification of Beach Patterns

  • Ana Cláudia TeodoroEmail author
  • Francisco Gutierres
  • Pedro Gomes
  • Jorge Rocha
Chapter
Part of the Coastal Research Library book series (COASTALRL, volume 24)

Abstract

Remote sensing data and image classification algorithms can be very useful in the identification of beach patterns and therefore can be used as inputs in beach classification models. In this work, one aerial photograph, one IKONOS-2 image and one FORMOSAT-2 image were applied to a part of the northwest coast of Portugal. Several image processing algorithms were employed and compared: pixel-based approach, object-based approach, Principal Components Analysis (PCA), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Decision Trees (DT). The ANN and DT algorithms employed conduced to better results than the traditional classification methodologies (pixel-based, object-based and PCA), allowed a more accurate identification of rip currents. Regarding the data used, the high spatial resolution of aerial photograph allows for the better discrimination of different micro patterns. The FORMOSAT-2 image presents a lower spatial resolution, which did not allow for the identification of small microforms. Concluding, the conjugation of better spatial and spectral resolution of IKONOS-2 data and the data mining algorithms seems to be the better approach to accurately identify beach patterns through remotely sensed data.

Keywords

Satellite images Image classification PCA Data mining OBIA 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank European Space Agency (ESA) for providing the IKONOS-2 image and National Space Organization, National Applied Research Laboratories of Taiwan for provided the FORMOSAT-2 image.

References

  1. Breiman L, J. Friedman, R. Olshen C. Stone (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth Int. Group.Google Scholar
  2. Cracknell AP (1999) Remote sensing techniques in estuaries and coastal zones–an update. Int J Remote Sens 19(3):485–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gutierres F, Teodoro AC, Reis E, Neto C, Costa JC (2016) Remote sensing technologies for the assessment of marine and coastal ecosystems. In: Charlie Finkl C, Makowski C (eds) Seafloor mapping along continental shelves: research and techniques for visualizing benthic environments, Coastal Research Library (CRL), vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 69–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Klemas V (2011) Remote sensing techniques for studying coastal ecosystems: an overview. J Coast Res 27(1):2–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Klemas V (2013) Remote sensing of emergent and submerged wetlands: an overview. Int J Remote Sens 34(18):6286–6320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Malthus TJ, Mumby PJ (2003) Remote sensing of the coastal zone: an overview and priorities for future research. Int J Remote Sens 24(13):2805–2815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pais-Barbosa J, Veloso-Gomes F, Taveira-Pinto F (2009) Portuguese Northwest Beach classification using aerial photographs and GIS tools. J Coast Res SI56:1552–1556Google Scholar
  8. Short AD (1991) Macro-meso tidal beach morphodynamics – an overview. J Coast Res 7(2):417–436Google Scholar
  9. Teodoro AC (2015) Applicability of data mining algorithms in the identification of beach features/patterns on high-resolution satellite data. J Appl Remote Sens 9(1):095095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Teodoro AC (2016) Optical satellite remote sensing of the coastal zone environment – an overview. In: Marghany M (ed) Environmental applications of remote sensing. In-Tech, pp 165–196Google Scholar
  11. Teodoro AC, Veloso-Gomes F, Gonçalves H (2007) Retrieving TSM concentration from multispectral satellite data by multiple regression and artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 45(5):1342–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Teodoro AC, Pais-Barbosa J, Veloso-Gomes F, Taveira-Pinto F (2009) Evaluation of beach Hydromorphological behaviour and classification using image classification techniques. J Coast Res 56(2):1607–1611Google Scholar
  13. Teodoro AC, Pais-Barbosa J, Gonçalves H, Veloso-Gomes F, Taveira-Pinto F (2011) Identification of beach features/patterns through image classification techniques applied to remotely sensed data. Int J Remote Sens 32(22):7399–7422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Teodoro AC, Duarte L, Silva P (2015) The applicability of FORMOSAT-2 images to coastal waters/bodies classification. In: Neale CMU, Maltese (eds) A proceedings of the SPIE 9637, Remote Sensing for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology XVII, 96371SGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Cláudia Teodoro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francisco Gutierres
    • 2
  • Pedro Gomes
    • 3
  • Jorge Rocha
    • 4
  1. 1.Earth Sciences Institute (ICT) and Department of Geosciences, Environment and Land Planning, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Big Data Analytics UnitEurecat – Technology Centre of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Environment and AgricultureNational Statistics InstituteLisbonPortugal
  4. 4.Institute of Geography and Spatial PlanningUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations