Skip to main content

A DEcision MAking (DEMA) Tool to Be Used in Ecosystem-Based Management System (EBMS) Applications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Coastal Research Library ((COASTALRL,volume 24))

Abstract

Beaches are basically managed mirroring user’s perception and normative requirements to obtain performance standards or distinctions made on well-known Quality Management Systems and/or Environmental Management Systems. However, when these systems are used in the management of these natural public goods, present practices do not fit with the Ecosystem Approach Strategy (EA) launched by United Nations at the end of last Century. To overcome this reality, an application of the Ecosystem-Based Management System (EBMS) was developed recently as a formal way to practice this approach at the beach social-ecological system. The EBMS is a stepwise process that combines environmental quality and risk management system theory with the EA principles. The EBMS is composed of three interactive pillars: Managerial, Information and Participatory. The Managerial pillar is the “engine” of the EBMS, following the classical Plan-Do-Check-Act managerial policy scheme. As a part of the Planning phase, a factual approach to decision making is suggested: DEMA (DEcision-MAking) tool. DEMA is a formal prioritization tool intended to help managers to determine, based on a social cost-benefit analysis and the vision established for a particular social-ecological system, which projects should be the first. DEMA uses risk management theory to decide what future activities should be selected in the policy cycle to avoid those identified risks that could impede us to get the desired vision for the beach under management. DEMA is using a framework of indicators related to the identified ecosystem services given by these systems, valuating and rating them to further prioritization of actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Ariza E, Sardá R, Jiménez JA et al (2008a) Beyond performance assessment measurements for beach management: application to Spanish Mediterranean beaches. Coast Manag 36:47–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariza E, Jiménez JA, Sardá R (2008b) A critical assessment of beach management on the Catalan coast. Ocean Coast Manag 51:141–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borja A, Bricker SB, Dauer DM et al (2008) Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide. Mar Pollut Bull 56:1519–1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper P (2013) Socio-ecological accounting: DPSWR, a modified DPSIR framework, and its application to marine ecosystems. Ecol Econ 94:106–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormier R, Kannen A, Elliott M et al (2013) Marine and coastal ecosystem-based risk management handbook. ICES cooperative research report, vol 317, p 59

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier R, Kannen A, Elliott M et al (2015) Marine spatial planning quality management system. ICES cooperative research report, vol 327, p 106

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ (2002) Geology of mankind: the Anthropocene. Nature 415:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming EW (1986) Out of the crisis. MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge, p 523

    Google Scholar 

  • De Reynier YL, Levin PS, Shoji HL (2010) Bringing stakeholders, scientists and managers together through an integrated ecosystem assessment process. Mar Pol 34:534–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehler C, Douvere F (2009) Marine spatial planning: a step-by-step approach toward Ecosystem-Based Management. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Program. IOCAM Cooperative Research Report, 273, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa-Romero MJ, Chan KMA, McDaniels T et al (2011) Structuring decision-making for ecosystem-based management. Mar Pol 35:575–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Environmental Agency (EEA) (1999) Environmental indicators: typology and overview. Technical report, vol 25. EEA, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox MJ (1994) Quality management systems. Chapman & Hall, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young RH, Potschin M (2010) The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In: Raffaelli DG, CLJ F (eds) Ecosystem ecology: a new synthesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 110–139

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy M (2008) Ocean risk analysis framework. Canadian fisheries and oceans report, p 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibañez S (2016) Normalización y Certificación como Herramientas para la Gestión Sostenible de Playas. AENOR, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • James RJ (2000) From beaches to beach environments: linking the ecology, human-use and management of beaches in Australia. Ocean Coast Manag 43:495–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozoya JP, Sardá R, Jimenez JA (2011) A methodological framework for multi-hazard risk assessment in beaches. Environ Sci Pol 14:685–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassl M, Löffler J (2015) Ecosystem services in coupled social–ecological systems: closing the cycle of service provision and societal feedback. Ambio 44:737–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen SB, Page GG, Ochoa E (2009) The Analysis of Governance to Ecosystem Change: a handbook for assembling a baseline. LOICZ reports and studies, 34, p 87

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice J, Trujillo V, Jennings S et al (2005) Guidance on the application of the ecosystem approach to management of human activities in the european marne environment. ICES cooperative research report, vol 273, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardá R, O’Higgins TG, Cormier R et al (2014) A proposed ecosystem-based management system for marine waters: linking the theory of environmental policy to the practice of environmental management. Ecol Soc 19:51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardá R, Valls JF, Ramis J et al (2015) Towards a new Integrated Beach management system: the ecosystem-Based management system for beaches. Ocean Coast Manag 118:167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan W, Richardson K, Rockström J et al (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Ecology 347(6223)

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP-WCMC (2011) Developing ecosystem service indicators: experiences and lessons learned from sub-global assessments and other initiatives. Secretariat of the convention on biological diversity, Technical series, vol 58, p 118

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out within the framework of the PLAYA+ project (CGL2013-49061) of the National Research Plan of Spain in R + D + i, as well as the KnowSeas + project (201530E018). We thanks the managers of the present book for allow us to present this paper here.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Sardá .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sardá, R., Azcárate, J.P.L. (2018). A DEcision MAking (DEMA) Tool to Be Used in Ecosystem-Based Management System (EBMS) Applications. In: Botero, C., Cervantes, O., Finkl, C. (eds) Beach Management Tools - Concepts, Methodologies and Case Studies. Coastal Research Library, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58304-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics