Assessing Shoreline Change Rates in Mediterranean Beaches

  • Fernando J. Aguilar
  • Ismael Fernández
  • Manuel A. Aguilar
  • Andrés M. García Lorca
Chapter
Part of the Coastal Research Library book series (COASTALRL, volume 24)

Abstract

Shoreline change rate constitutes an essential parameter for coastal areas management and monitoring in order to map erosion/accretion areas and to forecast the future shoreline position. Here, shoreline rates were assessed in a heavily human influenced coastal sector of the Mediterranean coast located at Almeria province, Spain. In order to evaluate shoreline rate change assessment in Mediterranean beaches, a comparison was carried out between three methods applied throughout 2009 to 2011 period. In this sense, two kinds of sources were used in order to derive shoreline positions: (i) digitizing the high water line (HWL) through orthoimage interpretation and (ii) automatically extracting a contour level from a LiDAR-derived coastal elevation model (CEM). Shoreline extraction quality was studied by comparing HWL and two datum-based contours, one extrapolated up to 0 m and the other interpolated at 0.75 m above mean sea level (Spanish altimetric datum). It was found a significant bias between HWL and datum-based shoreline positions which had been qualified as negligible in other previous studies carried out in microtidal areas. Since HWL and 0.75 m contour-based shorelines showed a similar distribution, although presenting an added offset, and the 0 m contour was too noisy because of extrapolation errors, it was concluded that the 0.75 m contour-based shoreline was the most stable and accurate proxy datum for multitemporal shorelines comparison. Finally, a high variability of shoreline position could be tested when HWL was used as a proxy for shoreline, being HWL less accurate than CEM-derived shorelines except for the case of using poorly accurate photogrammetrically derived CEMs (e.g. based on very old aerial flights).

Keywords

Shoreline change rate Shoreline accuracy Shoreline indicator Medium-term shoreline evolution Mediterranean beaches 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research work reported here was made possible through the Excellence Research Project RNM-3575, funded by the Andalusia Regional Government (Spain) and cofinanced by the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

This work takes part of the general research lines promoted by the CEI-MAR Campus of International Excellence as a joint initiative between the universities of Cádiz, Almería, Granada, Huelva and Málaga.

References

  1. Aguilar MA, Aguilar FJ, Fernández I, Mills JP (2013) Accuracy assessment of commercial self-calibrating bundle adjustment routines applied to archival aerial photography. Photogramm Rec 28(141):96–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boak EH, Turner IL (2005) Shoreline definition and detection: a review. J Coast Res 21(4):688–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dolan R, Fenster MS, Holme SJ (1991) Temporal analysis of shoreline recession and accretion. J Coast Res 7(3):723–744Google Scholar
  4. Douglas BC, Crowell M (2000) Long-term shoreline position prediction and error propagation. J Coast Res 16(1):145–152Google Scholar
  5. European Commission (2009) The economics of climate change adaptation in EU coastal areas. Final report. Directorate-General for Maritime Affaires and Fisheries, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernández I, Aguilar FJ, Aguilar MA, Pérez JL, Arenas A (2012) A new, robust and accurate method to extract tide-coordinated shorelines from coastal elevation models. J Coast Res 28(3):683–699Google Scholar
  7. Gens R (2010) Remote sensing of coastlines: detection, extraction and monitoring. Int J Remote Sens 31(7):1819–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hernández L, Alonso I, Sánchez-Pérez I, Alcántara-Carrió J, Montesdeoca I (2007) Shortage of sediments in the Maspalomas dune field (Gran Canaria, Canary Islands) deduced from analysis of aerial photographs, foraminiferal content, and sediment transport trends. J Coast Res 23(4):993–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moore LJ (2000) Shoreline mapping techniques. J Coast Res 16(1):111–124Google Scholar
  10. Moore LJ, Ruggiero P, List JH (2006) Comparing mean high water and high water line shorelines: should prosy-datum offsets be incorporated into shoreline change analysis? J Coast Res 22(4):894–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ojeda J (2000) Métodos para el cálculo de la erosión costera. Revisión, tendencias y propuesta. Boletín de la A.G.E. 30:103–118Google Scholar
  12. Pajak MJ, Leatherman S (2002) The high water line as shoreline indicator. J Coast Res 18(2):329–337Google Scholar
  13. Parker BB (2003) The difficulties in measuring a consistently defined shoreline - the problem of vertical referencing. J Coast Res Spec Issue 38:44–56Google Scholar
  14. Puertos del Estado (2016). Available: http://www.puertos.es/ [2016, 05/23].
  15. Ruggiero P, List JH (2009) Improving accuracy and statistical reliability of shoreline position and change rate estimates. J Coast Res 25(5):1069–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ruggiero P, Kaminsky GM, Gelfenbaum G (2003) Linking proxy-based and datum-based shorelines on a high-energy coastline: implications for shoreline change analyses. J Coast Res Spec Issue 38:57–82Google Scholar
  17. Stockdon HF, Holman RA, Howd PA, Sallenger AH Jr (2006) Empirical parameterization of setup, swash, and runup. Coast Eng 53(7):573–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Uceda AC, Sánchez-Arcilla A, Cardeña Z (2005) Impacts on coastal areas. In: Moreno-Rodríguez JM (ed) Impacts of climate change in Spain. Centro de Publicaciones del Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, pp 451–504Google Scholar
  19. Virdis SGP, Oggiano G, Disperati L (2012) A geomatics approach to multitemporal shoreline analysis in western mediterranean: the case of platamona-maritza beach (Northwest Sardinia, Italy). J Coast Res 28(3):624–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando J. Aguilar
    • 1
  • Ismael Fernández
    • 1
  • Manuel A. Aguilar
    • 1
  • Andrés M. García Lorca
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EngineeringUniversity of AlmeríaAlmeríaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Geography, History and Human SciencesUniversity of AlmeríaAlmeríaSpain

Personalised recommendations