Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 716))

  • 1272 Accesses

Abstract

In the paper we show how imposing the contextual structure of a knowledge base can lead to extending its expressiveness without changing the underlying language. We show this using the example of Description Logics, which constitutes a base for a range of dialects for expressing knowledge in ontologies (including state-of-the-art OWL).

While the contextual frameworks have been used in knowledge bases, they have been perceived as a tool for merging different viewpoints and domains, or a tool for simplifying reasoning by constraining the range of the statements being considered. We show, how it may also be used as a way of expressing more complicated interrelationships between terms, and discuss the import of this fact for authoring ontologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    With a bit of abuse of the notions, for the sake of simplicity throughout this paper we use the terms “ontology” and “knowledge base” interchangeably.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuiness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bar-Hillel, Y.: Indexical expressions. Mind 63, 359–379 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benerecetti, M., Bouquet, P., Ghidini, C.: On the dimensions of context dependence: partiality, approximation, and perspective. In: Akman, V., Bouquet, P., Thomason, R., Young, R. (eds.) CONTEXT 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2116, pp. 59–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). doi:10.1007/3-540-44607-9_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Borgida, A., Serafini, L.: Distributed description logics: assimilating information from peer sources. J. Data Semant. 1, 153–184 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bozzato, L., Serafini, L.: Materialization calculus for contexts in the semantic web. In: Proceedings of DL 2013. CEUR-WP, vol. 1014 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goczyła, K., Waloszek, A., Waloszek, W., Zawadzka, T.: Towards context-semantic knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the KEOD 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goczyła, K., Waloszek, A., Waloszek, W.: Contextualization of a DL knowledge base. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2007), pp. 291–299 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goczyła, K., Waloszek, A., Waloszek, W., Zawadzka, T.: Theoretical and architectural framework for contextual knowledge bases. In: Bembenik, R., Skonieczny, L., Rybiński, H., Niezgódka, M. (eds.) Intelligent Tools for Building a Scientific Information Platform: Advanced Architectures and Solutions, pp. 257–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Homola, M., Serafini, L., Tamilin, A.: Modeling contextualized knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Context, Information and Ontologies (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horn, A.: On sentences which are true of direct unions of algebras. J. Sym. Logic 16(1), 14–21 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Klarman, S. (ed.): Reasoning with contexts in description logics. Ph.D. thesis, Free University of Amsterdam (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kutz, O., Lutz, C., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Distributed description logics: assimilating information from peer sources. Artif. Intell. 156(1), 1–73 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lenat, D.B.: CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Commun. ACM 38(11), 33–38 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Motik, B., Sattler, U., Studer, R.: Query answering for OWL-DL with rules. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 549–563. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Musen, M.A.: The protégé project: a look back and a look forward. AI Matters 1(4), 4–12 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W3C: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer. W3C Recommendation (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the Polish National Centre for Research and Development (NCBiR) under Grant No. PBS3/B3/35/2015, project “Structuring and classification of Internet contents with prediction of its dynamics” (Polish title: “Strukturyzacja i klasyfikacja treści internetowych wraz z predykcja ich dynamiki”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wojciech Waloszek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Waloszek, A., Waloszek, W. (2017). Extending Expressiveness of Knowledge Description with Contextual Approach. In: Kozielski, S., Mrozek, D., Kasprowski, P., Małysiak-Mrozek, B., Kostrzewa, D. (eds) Beyond Databases, Architectures and Structures. Towards Efficient Solutions for Data Analysis and Knowledge Representation. BDAS 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 716. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58274-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58274-0_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58273-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58274-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics